Microstructure competences and grammatical errors of Danish-speaking children with developmental language disorder when telling and retelling narratives and engaging in spontaneous language.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1111/1460-6984.13131
Lone Sundahl Olsen, Kristine Jensen de López
{"title":"Microstructure competences and grammatical errors of Danish-speaking children with developmental language disorder when telling and retelling narratives and engaging in spontaneous language.","authors":"Lone Sundahl Olsen, Kristine Jensen de López","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.13131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on the grammatical characteristics of children with developmental language disorder (DLD) across languages has challenged accounts about the nature of DLD. Studies of the characteristics of DLD in different languages can reveal which components of DLD emerge irrespective of language and which components are language specific.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the grammatical characteristics of children with DLD acquiring Danish (microstructure and error types) in order to contribute to research on language-general and language-specific characteristics of DLD.</p><p><strong>Methods & procedures: </strong>Language samples from two telling narratives, one retelling narrative and one session of semi-spontaneous talk were collected from 39 Danish-speaking children aged 5;0-8;6, comprising one group of children with DLD (n = 15) and two control groups (age- and language-matched: n = 15 and = 9, respectively). The data were analysed with reference to microstructure and grammatical errors. The DLD children's performance was compared with that of their peers with typical language development (AM) and to that of a younger group matched on language comprehension (LM). Task effects were also analysed.</p><p><strong>Outcomes & results: </strong>A significant group difference in microstructure was present in the results for mean length of utterance (MLU), where the AM group had significant higher MLU compared with the DLD group. Two variables clearly distinguished DLD children from both AM and LM children in terms of errors, namely word order errors and omission errors. The analysis of grammatical errors also revealed that the most salient challenges for Danish-speaking children with DLD were not clearly morphological in nature. Although the children with DLD, as expected, made more morphological errors compared with the AM group, they did not produce more errors compared with the LM group. Task effects were present for some but not all results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions & implications: </strong>This research emphasizes the importance of cross-linguistic comparisons of the linguistic error profiles in the elicited language of children with DLD and the importance of considering the methodological context when analysing the grammatical language abilities of children with DLD. The results are relevant for clinicians and for developing screening tools.</p><p><strong>What this paper adds: </strong>What is already known on this subject DLD is characterized by challenges in producing and comprehending language. Ample research is available on English-speaking children with DLD, and which has reported on challenges acquiring morphology. Studies of children with DLD acquiring other languages than English show challenges related to specific grammatical features of the respective language. What this study adds to the existing knowledge This study is the first to investigate microstructure abilities and grammatical errors produced by Danish-speaking children with DLD and using different language samples (narrative telling, narrative retelling and spontaneous language). It enhances our knowledge about DLD in Scandinavian languages and cross-linguistically and reinforces cross-linguistic findings that grammatical and structural challenges in language acquisition for children with DLD might not be reducible exclusively to morphology. While some components of DLD children's language challenges may appear universal and be attributed to overarching factors other components seem more specific to the structure of the target language. Results from this study additionally draw attention to the importance of considering contextual constraints when investigating productive grammatical abilities in children with DLD. What are the practical and clinical implications of this work? More detailed analysis of grammatical error types seen in children with DLD acquiring languages other than English and of individual differences contribute to clinical advancement in the field. A better insight into grammatical difficulties of Danish-speaking children with DLD may contribute to improved assessment procedures and planning of therapy for children with DLD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research on the grammatical characteristics of children with developmental language disorder (DLD) across languages has challenged accounts about the nature of DLD. Studies of the characteristics of DLD in different languages can reveal which components of DLD emerge irrespective of language and which components are language specific.

Aims: To examine the grammatical characteristics of children with DLD acquiring Danish (microstructure and error types) in order to contribute to research on language-general and language-specific characteristics of DLD.

Methods & procedures: Language samples from two telling narratives, one retelling narrative and one session of semi-spontaneous talk were collected from 39 Danish-speaking children aged 5;0-8;6, comprising one group of children with DLD (n = 15) and two control groups (age- and language-matched: n = 15 and = 9, respectively). The data were analysed with reference to microstructure and grammatical errors. The DLD children's performance was compared with that of their peers with typical language development (AM) and to that of a younger group matched on language comprehension (LM). Task effects were also analysed.

Outcomes & results: A significant group difference in microstructure was present in the results for mean length of utterance (MLU), where the AM group had significant higher MLU compared with the DLD group. Two variables clearly distinguished DLD children from both AM and LM children in terms of errors, namely word order errors and omission errors. The analysis of grammatical errors also revealed that the most salient challenges for Danish-speaking children with DLD were not clearly morphological in nature. Although the children with DLD, as expected, made more morphological errors compared with the AM group, they did not produce more errors compared with the LM group. Task effects were present for some but not all results.

Conclusions & implications: This research emphasizes the importance of cross-linguistic comparisons of the linguistic error profiles in the elicited language of children with DLD and the importance of considering the methodological context when analysing the grammatical language abilities of children with DLD. The results are relevant for clinicians and for developing screening tools.

What this paper adds: What is already known on this subject DLD is characterized by challenges in producing and comprehending language. Ample research is available on English-speaking children with DLD, and which has reported on challenges acquiring morphology. Studies of children with DLD acquiring other languages than English show challenges related to specific grammatical features of the respective language. What this study adds to the existing knowledge This study is the first to investigate microstructure abilities and grammatical errors produced by Danish-speaking children with DLD and using different language samples (narrative telling, narrative retelling and spontaneous language). It enhances our knowledge about DLD in Scandinavian languages and cross-linguistically and reinforces cross-linguistic findings that grammatical and structural challenges in language acquisition for children with DLD might not be reducible exclusively to morphology. While some components of DLD children's language challenges may appear universal and be attributed to overarching factors other components seem more specific to the structure of the target language. Results from this study additionally draw attention to the importance of considering contextual constraints when investigating productive grammatical abilities in children with DLD. What are the practical and clinical implications of this work? More detailed analysis of grammatical error types seen in children with DLD acquiring languages other than English and of individual differences contribute to clinical advancement in the field. A better insight into grammatical difficulties of Danish-speaking children with DLD may contribute to improved assessment procedures and planning of therapy for children with DLD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦语发育性语言障碍儿童在讲述和复述故事以及使用自发语言时的微观结构能力和语法错误。
背景:对不同语言发育性语言障碍(DLD)儿童语法特征的研究,对有关 DLD 性质的说法提出了挑战。对不同语言发育障碍儿童的语法特征进行研究,可以揭示发育障碍儿童的哪些特征是不分语言而出现的,哪些特征是语言所特有的:从 39 名丹麦语儿童(5;0-8;6 岁)中收集了两次讲述、一次复述和一次半自发谈话的语言样本,其中包括一组 DLD 儿童(n = 15)和两组对照组(年龄和语言匹配:分别为 n = 15 和 = 9)。数据参照微观结构和语法错误进行分析。将 DLD 儿童的表现与具有典型语言发展水平的同龄人(AM)的表现进行了比较,并与在语言理解能力方面相匹配的较年轻群体(LM)的表现进行了比较。同时还分析了任务效应:在语篇平均长度(MLU)的结果中,微观结构方面存在明显的群体差异,与 DLD 群体相比,AM 群体的语篇平均长度明显更高。在错误方面,有两个变量将 DLD 儿童与 AM 和 LM 儿童明显区分开来,即词序错误和遗漏错误。对语法错误的分析还显示,说丹麦语的 DLD 儿童面临的最突出挑战并非明显的形态学性质。虽然如预期的那样,与 AM 组相比,DLD 儿童犯了更多的形态学错误,但与 LM 组相比,他们并没有犯更多的错误。部分结果存在任务效应,但不是所有结果:这项研究强调了对 DLD 儿童诱发语言中的语言错误进行跨语言比较的重要性,以及在分析 DLD 儿童的语法语言能力时考虑方法背景的重要性。研究结果对临床医生和筛查工具的开发具有重要意义:对这一主题的认识 DLD 的特点是在语言的产生和理解方面存在挑战。目前已有大量关于讲英语的 DLD 儿童的研究,这些研究报告了他们在学习形态学方面所面临的挑战。对学习英语以外的其他语言的 DLD 儿童进行的研究表明,他们所面临的挑战与相关语言的特定语法特征有关。本研究对现有知识的补充 本研究首次使用不同的语言样本(叙事讲述、叙事复述和自发语言),对丹麦语 DLD 儿童的微观结构能力和语法错误进行了调查。这项研究增进了我们对斯堪的纳维亚语言和跨语言的 DLD 的了解,并加强了跨语言研究的发现,即 DLD 儿童在语言习得过程中遇到的语法和结构挑战可能并不完全归因于语法。虽然 DLD 儿童在语言学习中遇到的某些挑战似乎具有普遍性,可以归因于总体因素,但其他挑战似乎更多地与目标语言的结构有关。本研究的结果还提醒我们,在研究 DLD 儿童的生产性语法能力时,考虑语境限制因素非常重要。这项工作有哪些实际和临床意义?对学习英语以外语言的 DLD 儿童的语法错误类型和个体差异进行更详细的分析,有助于该领域的临床进步。更好地了解丹麦语 DLD 儿童的语法困难可能有助于改进 DLD 儿童的评估程序和治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of evidence relating to the use of telesupervision for speech-language pathology students on clinical placements. How speech and language therapists and parents work together in the therapeutic process for children with speech sound disorder: A scoping review. Microstructure competences and grammatical errors of Danish-speaking children with developmental language disorder when telling and retelling narratives and engaging in spontaneous language. Issue Information Parental communication dynamics with children who stutter: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1