“Utility of social vulnerability index in trauma: A systematic review”

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.112016
Anthony J. Duncan , Samuel J. Bloomsburg , Mentor Ahmeti
{"title":"“Utility of social vulnerability index in trauma: A systematic review”","authors":"Anthony J. Duncan ,&nbsp;Samuel J. Bloomsburg ,&nbsp;Mentor Ahmeti","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Traumatic injuries remain a leading cause of mortality across age groups. Despite advancements in medical care, addressing the broader determinants of health is essential. Social determinants of health (SDOH), including socioeconomic factors, play a crucial role in patient outcomes. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), developed by the CDC, integrates various indicators, providing a comprehensive framework for assessing community vulnerability. The objective of this study is to evaluate the connection between SVI and trauma patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies that were peer reviewed, obtainable in English, used SVI as a measurement and involved blunt or penetrating trauma. Of the initial 623 papers 12 studies met inclusion criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In adult studies, high SVI correlated with increased trauma mortality, especially in specific domains like Household Composition and Disability. For gunshot injuries, residents of high SVI communities had a higher likelihood of recurrent injuries. Readmission rates showed mixed results, with potential associations in younger patients. Long-term outcomes, such as functional limitations and PTSD, were more prevalent in higher SVI quartiles. Pediatric studies indicated associations between SVI and outcomes like firearm injuries, intentional injuries, and rehabilitation admission rates.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>In summary, these studies collectively demonstrate that there is a predictive value that SVI carries as it relates to trauma outcomes, underscoring that targeted interventions and policies to address social vulnerabilities can be done using this index. Further research is imperative to delve into the intricate interactions between SVI and specific trauma outcomes, considering demographic variations and exploring the potential implications for public health interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"55 12","pages":"Article 112016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324007605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Traumatic injuries remain a leading cause of mortality across age groups. Despite advancements in medical care, addressing the broader determinants of health is essential. Social determinants of health (SDOH), including socioeconomic factors, play a crucial role in patient outcomes. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), developed by the CDC, integrates various indicators, providing a comprehensive framework for assessing community vulnerability. The objective of this study is to evaluate the connection between SVI and trauma patient outcomes.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies that were peer reviewed, obtainable in English, used SVI as a measurement and involved blunt or penetrating trauma. Of the initial 623 papers 12 studies met inclusion criteria.

Results

In adult studies, high SVI correlated with increased trauma mortality, especially in specific domains like Household Composition and Disability. For gunshot injuries, residents of high SVI communities had a higher likelihood of recurrent injuries. Readmission rates showed mixed results, with potential associations in younger patients. Long-term outcomes, such as functional limitations and PTSD, were more prevalent in higher SVI quartiles. Pediatric studies indicated associations between SVI and outcomes like firearm injuries, intentional injuries, and rehabilitation admission rates.

Discussion

In summary, these studies collectively demonstrate that there is a predictive value that SVI carries as it relates to trauma outcomes, underscoring that targeted interventions and policies to address social vulnerabilities can be done using this index. Further research is imperative to delve into the intricate interactions between SVI and specific trauma outcomes, considering demographic variations and exploring the potential implications for public health interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"社会脆弱性指数在创伤中的作用:系统回顾"。
导言:外伤仍然是各年龄段人群死亡的主要原因。尽管医疗保健取得了进步,但解决更广泛的健康决定因素仍至关重要。健康的社会决定因素(SDOH),包括社会经济因素,对患者的治疗效果起着至关重要的作用。美国疾病预防控制中心开发的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)综合了各种指标,为评估社区脆弱性提供了一个全面的框架。本研究旨在评估 SVI 与创伤患者预后之间的联系:使用 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 进行了系统的文献检索。纳入标准包括经同行评审、以英语撰写、使用 SVI 作为测量指标、涉及钝性或穿透性创伤的研究。在最初的 623 篇论文中,有 12 项研究符合纳入标准:在成人研究中,高 SVI 与创伤死亡率的增加有关,尤其是在家庭组成和残疾等特定领域。就枪伤而言,高 SVI 社区居民再次受伤的可能性更高。再入院率的结果不一,年轻患者可能与此有关联。在 SVI 四分位数较高的社区,功能受限和创伤后应激障碍等长期结果更为普遍。儿科研究表明,SVI 与火器伤害、故意伤害和康复入院率等结果之间存在关联:总之,这些研究共同表明,SVI 具有与创伤结果相关的预测价值,并强调可以利用该指数制定有针对性的干预措施和政策,以解决社会脆弱性问题。进一步的研究势在必行,以深入探讨 SVI 与特定创伤结果之间错综复杂的相互作用,考虑人口统计学差异,并探索对公共卫生干预措施的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Does injury type influence patient preference, response rates, and data completeness for online or telephone follow-up following injury? Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures in England: patient profiles and short-term outcomes Pancreaticoduodenectomy in high-grade pancreatic and duodenal trauma The Influence of Nerve Surgical Techniques at Time of Amputation on the Prevalence of Heterotopic Ossification in Transtibial Amputees Perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation of injury prevention programs in the military: feedback from inside the trenches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1