Psychometric evaluation of the spiritual perspective scale for adolescents and young adults with cancer

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100594
Chin-Mi Chen , Heeyeon Son , Yvonne Yueh-Feng Lu , Li-Min Wu
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the spiritual perspective scale for adolescents and young adults with cancer","authors":"Chin-Mi Chen ,&nbsp;Heeyeon Son ,&nbsp;Yvonne Yueh-Feng Lu ,&nbsp;Li-Min Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the reliability and validity of the spiritual perspective scale (SPS) for adolescents and young adults with cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted with 277 adolescents and young adults with cancer aged 10–24 years who were recruited from Taiwan and Korea. The reliability of the SPS was assessed using Cronbach's α. Its factor structure was determined by exploratory factor analysis. Known-group validity was tested by comparing resilience scores between two groups and between countries using <em>t</em> test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cronbach's α values for the SPS was 0.94, and item–total correlation values ranged from 0.53 to 0.84. Factor analysis generated two factors (spiritual behaviors and spiritual beliefs) that explained 78.02% of the total variance, with factor loadings ranging from 0.51 to 0.94. Participants with lower resilience had significantly lower spirituality scores compared to those with higher resilience (<em>t</em> = 3.13, <em>P</em> = 0.002). The SPS scores were not significantly different between participants in Taiwan and Korea (<em>t</em> = 1.09, <em>P</em> = 0.276). However, the spiritual beliefs subscale scores did show a significant difference between these groups (<em>t</em> = 2.74, <em>P</em> = 0.007).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The spiritual perspective scale is a valid and reliable tool for measuring the spirituality of adolescents and young adults with cancer in Taiwan and Korea. The SPS showed sensitivity in detecting variations in spiritual beliefs between adolescents and young adults with cancer in Taiwan and Korea.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"11 11","pages":"Article 100594"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524002166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the reliability and validity of the spiritual perspective scale (SPS) for adolescents and young adults with cancer.

Methods

The study was conducted with 277 adolescents and young adults with cancer aged 10–24 years who were recruited from Taiwan and Korea. The reliability of the SPS was assessed using Cronbach's α. Its factor structure was determined by exploratory factor analysis. Known-group validity was tested by comparing resilience scores between two groups and between countries using t test.

Results

Cronbach's α values for the SPS was 0.94, and item–total correlation values ranged from 0.53 to 0.84. Factor analysis generated two factors (spiritual behaviors and spiritual beliefs) that explained 78.02% of the total variance, with factor loadings ranging from 0.51 to 0.94. Participants with lower resilience had significantly lower spirituality scores compared to those with higher resilience (t = 3.13, P = 0.002). The SPS scores were not significantly different between participants in Taiwan and Korea (t = 1.09, P = 0.276). However, the spiritual beliefs subscale scores did show a significant difference between these groups (t = 2.74, P = 0.007).

Conclusions

The spiritual perspective scale is a valid and reliable tool for measuring the spirituality of adolescents and young adults with cancer in Taiwan and Korea. The SPS showed sensitivity in detecting variations in spiritual beliefs between adolescents and young adults with cancer in Taiwan and Korea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年癌症患者精神视角量表的心理计量学评估
目的 评价青少年癌症患者精神视角量表(SPS)的信度和效度。 方法 对来自台湾和韩国的 277 名 10-24 岁青少年癌症患者进行了研究。通过探索性因子分析确定了 SPS 的因子结构。结果SPS的Cronbach's α值为0.94,项目-总相关值在0.53至0.84之间。因子分析产生了两个因子(精神行为和精神信仰),解释了总方差的 78.02%,因子载荷在 0.51 到 0.94 之间。与复原力较高的参与者相比,复原力较低的参与者的灵性得分明显较低(t = 3.13,P = 0.002)。台湾和韩国参与者的 SPS 分数没有明显差异(t = 1.09,P = 0.276)。结论灵性观点量表是测量台湾和韩国青少年癌症患者灵性的有效而可靠的工具。灵性观点量表在检测台湾和韩国青少年癌症患者的灵性信念差异方面显示出灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
31 days
期刊最新文献
Development and preliminary validation of a PICC-related venous thrombosis risk prediction model for cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis predominantly based on Chinese populations Bridging symptoms linking postoperative symptom clusters seven days after esophagectomy: A multicenter network analysis of 418 patients with esophageal cancer Empowering oncology nurses: The transformative power of mentorship in cancer care Disease-related communication difficulties and dyadic coping among patients with breast cancer and their spouses: An actor–partner interdependence model Trajectories and predictors of frailty in older patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: A longitudinal study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1