Predictors of driving errors contributing to crashes in older adults across age groups, 2010 to 2020

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.11.010
Gilsu Pae , Jonathan Davis , Joseph Cavanaugh , Motao Zhu , Cara Hamann
{"title":"Predictors of driving errors contributing to crashes in older adults across age groups, 2010 to 2020","authors":"Gilsu Pae ,&nbsp;Jonathan Davis ,&nbsp;Joseph Cavanaugh ,&nbsp;Motao Zhu ,&nbsp;Cara Hamann","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.11.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction:</em> Given the largely autocentric nature of the United States, drivers continue to operate vehicles with varying levels of driving ability and self-restriction as they advance into older age. This study explores the associations of vehicle actions and traffic control devices with older drivers’ driving errors contributing to crashes, incorporating age group as effect modifiers of these relationships. <em>Method:</em> This study includes crashes reported to the Iowa Department of Transportation from 2010 to 2020. Analysis was completed for drivers involved in a crash who were aged 45 years and older (n = 254,912). Driving errors were identified based on driver contributing factors reported in the Iowa crash data. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to model predictors of driving errors, focusing on crash-related vehicle actions and traffic control devices. Additionally, interaction terms were incorporated to examine the moderating effect of age groups (45–64; 65–74; 75–84; 85+). <em>Results:</em> Driving errors increased with age, especially in the middle-old age group (75–84). A higher probability of driving errors was observed in changing lanes, merging, and turning, with right turns showing the most substantive increase in the middle-old age group compared to the other age groups. Stop and yield signs were associated with a higher probability of driving errors, increasing monotonically with age. The middle-old age group exhibited a notable increase in driving errors at uncontrolled or traffic signaled locations compared to the other age groups. <em>Conclusions:</em> The significant increase in driving errors at and beyond the middle-old age group may demonstrate higher age-related declines in safe driving compared to younger age groups. <em>Practical Applications:</em> Careful evaluations for older drivers’ fitness to drive during license renewal periods are needed once drivers reach the middle-old age. Additionally, effective combinations of advanced technologies, traffic systems, and policies are necessary to reduce the burdens associated with aging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"92 ","pages":"Pages 40-47"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524001592","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Given the largely autocentric nature of the United States, drivers continue to operate vehicles with varying levels of driving ability and self-restriction as they advance into older age. This study explores the associations of vehicle actions and traffic control devices with older drivers’ driving errors contributing to crashes, incorporating age group as effect modifiers of these relationships. Method: This study includes crashes reported to the Iowa Department of Transportation from 2010 to 2020. Analysis was completed for drivers involved in a crash who were aged 45 years and older (n = 254,912). Driving errors were identified based on driver contributing factors reported in the Iowa crash data. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to model predictors of driving errors, focusing on crash-related vehicle actions and traffic control devices. Additionally, interaction terms were incorporated to examine the moderating effect of age groups (45–64; 65–74; 75–84; 85+). Results: Driving errors increased with age, especially in the middle-old age group (75–84). A higher probability of driving errors was observed in changing lanes, merging, and turning, with right turns showing the most substantive increase in the middle-old age group compared to the other age groups. Stop and yield signs were associated with a higher probability of driving errors, increasing monotonically with age. The middle-old age group exhibited a notable increase in driving errors at uncontrolled or traffic signaled locations compared to the other age groups. Conclusions: The significant increase in driving errors at and beyond the middle-old age group may demonstrate higher age-related declines in safe driving compared to younger age groups. Practical Applications: Careful evaluations for older drivers’ fitness to drive during license renewal periods are needed once drivers reach the middle-old age. Additionally, effective combinations of advanced technologies, traffic systems, and policies are necessary to reduce the burdens associated with aging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2010 年至 2020 年各年龄组老年人驾驶失误导致撞车事故的预测因素
导言:由于美国基本上是以汽车为中心的国家,随着年龄的增长,驾驶员的驾驶能力和自我约束能力也在不断提高。本研究探讨了车辆操作和交通控制设备与老年驾驶员驾驶失误导致撞车事故之间的关系,并将年龄组作为这些关系的效应调节因子。研究方法:本研究包括 2010 年至 2020 年向爱荷华州交通局报告的撞车事故。分析对象为年龄在 45 岁及以上的车祸驾驶员(n = 254,912 人)。根据爱荷华州车祸数据中报告的驾驶员诱因确定了驾驶错误。我们建立了一个多变量逻辑回归模型来模拟驾驶失误的预测因素,重点关注与车祸相关的车辆行为和交通控制设备。此外,还加入了交互项,以检验年龄组(45-64 岁;65-74 岁;75-84 岁;85 岁以上)的调节作用。研究结果驾驶错误随着年龄的增长而增加,尤其是在中老年组(75-84 岁)。与其他年龄组相比,中老年组在变更车道、并线和转弯时出现驾驶错误的概率较高,其中右转弯的错误率增幅最大。停车和让行标志与较高的驾驶失误概率有关,随着年龄的增长而单调增加。与其他年龄组相比,中年组在不受控制或有交通信号的地点出现驾驶错误的概率明显增加。结论与年轻人相比,中年及中年以上年龄组的驾驶失误率明显增加,这可能表明与年龄相关的安全驾驶下降率更高。实际应用:一旦驾驶员达到中年年龄,就需要在驾驶执照更新期间对老年驾驶员的驾驶能力进行仔细评估。此外,有必要将先进技术、交通系统和政策有效结合起来,以减轻老龄化带来的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
Trends in parcel delivery driver injury: Evidence from NEISS-Work Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed U.S. workers within the Construction sector, 2010–2019 Safety climate and fatigue have differential impacts on safety issues Great to use as a conversation starter: End user views on the acceptability and feasibility of a prototype decision aid for older drivers Investigating perspectives towards online content that promotes road safety: A qualitative study across three age groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1