Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2427-3893
Kareem Khalaf, Katarzyna M Pawlak, Douglas G Adler, Asma A Alkandari, Alan N Barkun, Todd H Baron, Robert Bechara, Tyler M Berzin, Cecilia Binda, Ming-Yan Cai, Silvia Carrara, Yen-I Chen, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura, Nauzer Forbes, Alessandro Fugazza, Cesare Hassan, Paul D James, Michel Kahaleh, Harry Martin, Roberta Maselli, Gary R May, Jeffrey D Mosko, Ganiyat Kikelomo Oyeleke, Bret T Petersen, Alessandro Repici, Payal Saxena, Amrita Sethi, Reem Z Sharaiha, Marco Spadaccini, Raymond Shing-Yan Tang, Christopher W Teshima, Mariano Villarroel, Jeanin E van Hooft, Rogier P Voermans, Daniel von Renteln, Catharine M Walsh, Tricia Aberin, Dawn Banavage, Jowell A Chen, James Clancy, Heather Drake, Melanie Im, Chooi Peng Low, Alexandra Myszko, Krista Navarro, Jessica Redman, Wayne Reyes, Faina Weinstein, Sunil Gupta, Ahmed H Mokhtar, Caleb Na, Daniel Tham, Yusuke Fujiyoshi, Tony He, Sharan B Malipatil, Reza Gholami, Nikko Gimpaya, Arjun Kundra, Samir C Grover, Natalia S Causada Calo
{"title":"Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.","authors":"Kareem Khalaf, Katarzyna M Pawlak, Douglas G Adler, Asma A Alkandari, Alan N Barkun, Todd H Baron, Robert Bechara, Tyler M Berzin, Cecilia Binda, Ming-Yan Cai, Silvia Carrara, Yen-I Chen, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura, Nauzer Forbes, Alessandro Fugazza, Cesare Hassan, Paul D James, Michel Kahaleh, Harry Martin, Roberta Maselli, Gary R May, Jeffrey D Mosko, Ganiyat Kikelomo Oyeleke, Bret T Petersen, Alessandro Repici, Payal Saxena, Amrita Sethi, Reem Z Sharaiha, Marco Spadaccini, Raymond Shing-Yan Tang, Christopher W Teshima, Mariano Villarroel, Jeanin E van Hooft, Rogier P Voermans, Daniel von Renteln, Catharine M Walsh, Tricia Aberin, Dawn Banavage, Jowell A Chen, James Clancy, Heather Drake, Melanie Im, Chooi Peng Low, Alexandra Myszko, Krista Navarro, Jessica Redman, Wayne Reyes, Faina Weinstein, Sunil Gupta, Ahmed H Mokhtar, Caleb Na, Daniel Tham, Yusuke Fujiyoshi, Tony He, Sharan B Malipatil, Reza Gholami, Nikko Gimpaya, Arjun Kundra, Samir C Grover, Natalia S Causada Calo","doi":"10.1055/a-2427-3893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Use of fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy is an essential aid in advanced endoscopic interventions. However, it also raises concerns about radiation exposure. This study aimed to develop consensus-based statements for safe and effective use of fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy, prioritizing the safety and well-being of healthcare workers and patients. <b>Methods</b> A modified Delphi approach was employed to achieve consensus over three rounds of surveys. Proposed statements were generated in Round 1. In the second round, panelists rated potential statements on a 5-point scale, with consensus defined as ≥80% agreement. Statements were subsequently prioritized in Round 3, using a 1 (lowest priority) to 10 (highest priority) scale. <b>Results</b> Forty-six experts participated, consisting of 34 therapeutic endoscopists and 12 endoscopy nurses from six continents, with an overall 45.6% female representation (n = 21). Forty-three item statements were generated in the first round. Of these, 31 statements achieved consensus after the second round. These statements were categorized into General Considerations (n = 6), Education (n = 10), Pregnancy (n = 4), Family Planning (n = 2), Patient Safety (n = 4), and Staff Safety (n = 5). In the third round, accepted statements received mean priority scores ranging from 7.28 to 9.36, with 87.2% of statements rated as very high priority (mean score ≥ 9). <b>Conclusions</b> This study presents consensus-based statements for safe and effective use of fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy, addressing the well-being of healthcare workers and patients. These consensus-based statements aim to mitigate risks associated with radiation exposure while maintaining benefits of fluoroscopy, ultimately promoting a culture of safety in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 11","pages":"E1315-E1325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2427-3893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims Use of fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy is an essential aid in advanced endoscopic interventions. However, it also raises concerns about radiation exposure. This study aimed to develop consensus-based statements for safe and effective use of fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy, prioritizing the safety and well-being of healthcare workers and patients. Methods A modified Delphi approach was employed to achieve consensus over three rounds of surveys. Proposed statements were generated in Round 1. In the second round, panelists rated potential statements on a 5-point scale, with consensus defined as ≥80% agreement. Statements were subsequently prioritized in Round 3, using a 1 (lowest priority) to 10 (highest priority) scale. Results Forty-six experts participated, consisting of 34 therapeutic endoscopists and 12 endoscopy nurses from six continents, with an overall 45.6% female representation (n = 21). Forty-three item statements were generated in the first round. Of these, 31 statements achieved consensus after the second round. These statements were categorized into General Considerations (n = 6), Education (n = 10), Pregnancy (n = 4), Family Planning (n = 2), Patient Safety (n = 4), and Staff Safety (n = 5). In the third round, accepted statements received mean priority scores ranging from 7.28 to 9.36, with 87.2% of statements rated as very high priority (mean score ≥ 9). Conclusions This study presents consensus-based statements for safe and effective use of fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy, addressing the well-being of healthcare workers and patients. These consensus-based statements aim to mitigate risks associated with radiation exposure while maintaining benefits of fluoroscopy, ultimately promoting a culture of safety in healthcare settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用德尔菲法确定消化道内窥镜透视标准。
背景和研究目的 在消化内镜检查中使用透视技术是先进内镜介入治疗的重要辅助手段。然而,它也引发了对辐射暴露的担忧。本研究旨在为在消化道内窥镜检查中安全有效地使用透视技术制定基于共识的声明,优先考虑医护人员和患者的安全和福祉。方法 采用改良德尔菲法,通过三轮调查达成共识。在第一轮调查中提出了建议声明。 在第二轮调查中,小组成员按 5 分制对潜在声明进行评分,达成共识的定义是同意率≥80%。随后,在第三轮中,采用从 1 分(最低优先级)到 10 分(最高优先级)的评分标准对陈述进行优先排序。结果 46 名专家参与了讨论,其中包括来自六大洲的 34 名治疗性内镜医师和 12 名内镜护士,女性占总人数的 45.6%(n = 21)。第一轮共产生了 43 个项目陈述。其中 31 项陈述在第二轮讨论后达成共识。这些声明分为一般考虑(n = 6)、教育(n = 10)、怀孕(n = 4)、计划生育(n = 2)、患者安全(n = 4)和员工安全(n = 5)。在第三轮中,被接受的声明获得了 7.28 至 9.36 分的平均优先级,其中 87.2% 的声明被评为 "非常高优先级"(平均分≥ 9 分)。结论 本研究就胃肠道内窥镜检查中安全有效地使用透视技术提出了基于共识的声明,以解决医护人员和患者的福祉问题。这些基于共识的声明旨在降低与辐射照射相关的风险,同时保持透视检查的益处,最终促进医疗机构的安全文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology. Discharging the duty of candor following delayed post-endoscopy cancer diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1