Duration of kissing in different intimate positions among men who have sex with men: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY International Journal of STD & AIDS Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1177/09564624241301490
Julien Tran, Christopher K Fairley, Jason J Ong, Catriona S Bradshaw, Ei T Aung, Kate Maddaford, Marcus Y Chen, Jane S Hocking, Eric Pf Chow
{"title":"Duration of kissing in different intimate positions among men who have sex with men: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Julien Tran, Christopher K Fairley, Jason J Ong, Catriona S Bradshaw, Ei T Aung, Kate Maddaford, Marcus Y Chen, Jane S Hocking, Eric Pf Chow","doi":"10.1177/09564624241301490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDespite mounting evidence showing that kissing (tongue-kissing) may transmit gonorrhoea between men who have sex with men (MSM), little data exists on factors influencing the duration of kissing while they are above and/or lying underneath a partner for this population group.MethodsBetween May 2019 and March 2020, we invited MSM aged ≥18 years who attended the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC) to participate in a survey about the duration of their kissing (minutes) and intimate position while kissing (i.e., kissing while above, or while lying underneath) their most recent partner. Univariable and multivariable negative binomial regressions were performed to examine the associations between the duration of kissing in different intimate positions, and demographic and behavioural characteristics (including age, region of birth, HIV status or PrEP use, and role in anal sex).ResultsOf the 965 men with a recent male kissing partner, 89.0% (<i>n</i> = 859) also had sex with that partner. Of the 166 men with a recent female kissing partner, 71.7% (<i>n</i> = 119) also had sex with that partner. Our adjusted analyses showed that, on average, men born in Asia (mean 8.52 vs 11.69 min, <i>p</i> < .001) and South America or the Caribbean (mean 8.61 vs 11.69 min, <i>p</i> = .022) spent less time kissing compared to men born in Oceania, and the same was also observed for kissing while above or lying underneath. Men who had only receptive anal sex spent less time kissing while above than those who only had insertive anal sex (mean 3.04 vs 5.86 min, <i>p</i> < .001).ConclusionOur study is the first to examine factors that influence duration of kissing in different intimate positions. These factors could be associated with oropharyngeal gonorrhoea if saliva transmitted gonorrhoea and if gravity played a role.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"372-380"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624241301490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDespite mounting evidence showing that kissing (tongue-kissing) may transmit gonorrhoea between men who have sex with men (MSM), little data exists on factors influencing the duration of kissing while they are above and/or lying underneath a partner for this population group.MethodsBetween May 2019 and March 2020, we invited MSM aged ≥18 years who attended the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC) to participate in a survey about the duration of their kissing (minutes) and intimate position while kissing (i.e., kissing while above, or while lying underneath) their most recent partner. Univariable and multivariable negative binomial regressions were performed to examine the associations between the duration of kissing in different intimate positions, and demographic and behavioural characteristics (including age, region of birth, HIV status or PrEP use, and role in anal sex).ResultsOf the 965 men with a recent male kissing partner, 89.0% (n = 859) also had sex with that partner. Of the 166 men with a recent female kissing partner, 71.7% (n = 119) also had sex with that partner. Our adjusted analyses showed that, on average, men born in Asia (mean 8.52 vs 11.69 min, p < .001) and South America or the Caribbean (mean 8.61 vs 11.69 min, p = .022) spent less time kissing compared to men born in Oceania, and the same was also observed for kissing while above or lying underneath. Men who had only receptive anal sex spent less time kissing while above than those who only had insertive anal sex (mean 3.04 vs 5.86 min, p < .001).ConclusionOur study is the first to examine factors that influence duration of kissing in different intimate positions. These factors could be associated with oropharyngeal gonorrhoea if saliva transmitted gonorrhoea and if gravity played a role.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男男性行为者以不同亲密姿势接吻的持续时间:一项横断面研究。
背景:尽管有越来越多的证据表明,接吻(舌吻)可能会在男男性行为者(MSM)之间传播淋病,但关于影响该人群在伴侣上方和/或躺在伴侣下方时接吻持续时间的因素的数据却很少:2019年5月至2020年3月期间,我们邀请墨尔本性健康中心(MSHC)就诊的≥18岁的男男性行为者参与一项调查,了解他们与最近的性伴侣接吻的持续时间(分钟)和接吻时的亲密姿势(即在上方接吻或躺在下方接吻)。我们进行了单变量和多变量负二项回归,以研究不同亲密姿势下的接吻持续时间与人口统计学特征和行为特征(包括年龄、出生地区、HIV 感染状况或 PrEP 使用情况以及在肛交中的角色)之间的关联:在最近有男性接吻伴侣的 965 名男性中,89.0%(n = 859)还与该伴侣发生过性关系。在最近有女性接吻伴侣的 166 名男性中,71.7%(n = 119)的人也与该伴侣发生过性关系。我们的调整分析表明,与出生在大洋洲的男性相比,出生在亚洲(平均为 8.52 分钟 vs 11.69 分钟,p < .001)和南美洲或加勒比海地区(平均为 8.61 分钟 vs 11.69 分钟,p = .022)的男性平均接吻时间较短。只发生过接受性肛交的男性在上面接吻的时间比只发生过插入性肛交的男性少(平均 3.04 分钟 vs 5.86 分钟,p < .001):我们的研究首次探讨了影响不同亲密姿势下接吻时间的因素。结论:我们的研究首次探讨了影响不同亲密体位接吻持续时间的因素,如果唾液传播淋病,如果重力起作用,这些因素可能与口咽淋病有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
A qualitative assessment of the factors influencing demand for PrEP among female college students in Durban, South Africa. Optimizing renal risk assessment in HIV: Validation of the Thai CKD risk score against global models in ART patients. Bridging gaps in HIV care for transgender women: A decade of real-world evidence. The waiting room: Unmet sexual health service needs among men and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in England, findings from an online, cross-sectional community survey in 2024. Superiority of propolis and honey over topical acyclovir for herpes simplex: A meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1