Diagnostic utility of Cyttel-Tech in identifying meningeal metastases from malignant solid tumors: An observational study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000040410
Yangjun Gao, Wenxuan Fan, Xiaojing Liu, Ning Ma, Bo Yang, Wei Yang, Jun Zhao
{"title":"Diagnostic utility of Cyttel-Tech in identifying meningeal metastases from malignant solid tumors: An observational study.","authors":"Yangjun Gao, Wenxuan Fan, Xiaojing Liu, Ning Ma, Bo Yang, Wei Yang, Jun Zhao","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the value of circulating tumor cell (CTC) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by Cyttel-Tech detection in patients with suspected leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from malignant solid tumors. We collected CSF from 12 patients with suspected LM from malignant solid tumors at our hospital. Twelve milliliters (mL) of CSF were collected from each patient through the first lumbar puncture: 5 mL was for CTC detection by Cyttel-Tech method, 5 mL for CSF cytopathology examination, and 2 mL for cytology and biochemical analysis of the CSF. Additionally, all patients underwent cranial brain magnetic resonance imaging with both plain and contrast-enhanced scans. Among the 12 patients with suspected LM, CTC detection yielded a positivity rate of 11/12 (91.7%). The positivity rate for CSF cytopathology examination was 4/12 (33.3%). However, none of the patients showed positive findings on cranial brain magnetic resonance imaging with both plain and contrast-enhanced scans (0/12, 0%). The difference between CTC detection and cytopathology detection was statistically significant (P < .05). CTC detection may have a high positivity rate in diagnosing LM from malignant solid tumors. It potentially serves as a supplementary diagnostic method for patients with negative pathology results and be used for rapid and accurate adjunctive diagnosis of LM.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 46","pages":"e40410"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the value of circulating tumor cell (CTC) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by Cyttel-Tech detection in patients with suspected leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from malignant solid tumors. We collected CSF from 12 patients with suspected LM from malignant solid tumors at our hospital. Twelve milliliters (mL) of CSF were collected from each patient through the first lumbar puncture: 5 mL was for CTC detection by Cyttel-Tech method, 5 mL for CSF cytopathology examination, and 2 mL for cytology and biochemical analysis of the CSF. Additionally, all patients underwent cranial brain magnetic resonance imaging with both plain and contrast-enhanced scans. Among the 12 patients with suspected LM, CTC detection yielded a positivity rate of 11/12 (91.7%). The positivity rate for CSF cytopathology examination was 4/12 (33.3%). However, none of the patients showed positive findings on cranial brain magnetic resonance imaging with both plain and contrast-enhanced scans (0/12, 0%). The difference between CTC detection and cytopathology detection was statistically significant (P < .05). CTC detection may have a high positivity rate in diagnosing LM from malignant solid tumors. It potentially serves as a supplementary diagnostic method for patients with negative pathology results and be used for rapid and accurate adjunctive diagnosis of LM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cyttel-Tech 在识别恶性实体瘤脑膜转移方面的诊断作用:一项观察性研究。
通过 Cyttel-Tech 检测恶性实体瘤脑脊液(CSF)中循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)的价值。我们收集了本医院 12 名疑似恶性实体瘤 LM 患者的 CSF。每位患者通过第一次腰椎穿刺采集 12 毫升 CSF:其中 5 毫升用于 Cyttel-Tech 法检测 CTC,5 毫升用于 CSF 细胞病理学检查,2 毫升用于 CSF 细胞学和生化分析。此外,所有患者都接受了头颅脑磁共振成像检查,包括普通扫描和对比增强扫描。在 12 名疑似 LM 患者中,CTC 检测的阳性率为 11/12(91.7%)。脑脊液细胞病理学检查的阳性率为 4/12(33.3%)。然而,没有一名患者在头颅脑磁共振成像(包括普通扫描和对比增强扫描)中出现阳性结果(0/12,0%)。CTC 检测结果与细胞病理学检测结果之间的差异具有统计学意义(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A case report of rectal small-cell undifferentiated carcinoma achieved pathological complete response. Neutrophil phenotypes in prolonged labor: Implications for therapeutic strategies. Nonlinear association of alkaline phosphatase-to-albumin ratio with all-cause and cancer mortality: Evidence from NHANES 2005 to 2016. New ultrasound-guided L5 selective nerve root block puncture approach for the treatment of pain due to high-iliac-crest lumbar disc herniation: A case report. Observation on the efficacy and safety of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1