Does the intervention for adhesive capsulitis in patients with diabetes differ from that for patients without diabetes?: A systematic review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000040238
Shuquan Tang, Xiaoya Tan
{"title":"Does the intervention for adhesive capsulitis in patients with diabetes differ from that for patients without diabetes?: A systematic review.","authors":"Shuquan Tang, Xiaoya Tan","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adhesive capsulitis (AC) is often accompanied by pain and restriction in range of movement, which long lasting symptoms often have negative impact on patients' work and lives. Since diabetes mellitus (DM) is an independent risk factor for developing AC, and AC with DM have more limitations of joint motion than general people.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the present study is to evaluate the difference of clinical efficacy between diabetes and non-diabetes, and to explore whether AC with diabetes need special intervention compared to non-diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pubmed NCBI and Embase were searched for studies published in the last 30 years. We conducted a literature search for terms regarding AC and DM on Pubmed NCBI and Embase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 studies eligible for inclusion. The affected shoulders in these studies ranged from 26 to 135, 460 shoulders (551 participants) in total, including 166 shoulders in diabetic group and 394 shoulders in non-diabetic/idiopathic group. Interventions included shock wave therapy, hydrodilatation, arthroscopic capsular release, manipulation under cervical nerve root block. Evaluation indicators included pain, certain shoulder questionnaires, range of motion. Positive clinical efficacy were emerged after interventions between the 2 groups. The studies that better improvement of pain in non-diabetic/idiopathic group were 2 of 6, that of certain shoulder questionnaires were 4 of 8, that of range of motion were 3 of 6.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whether AC combined with DM or not, the current treatment could achieve positive clinical effectiveness and there is some statistical evidence show that the curative effect of AC combined with DM is worse than non-diabetic. In other words, the available evidence suggests that patients with DM might require additional rehabilitation measures with routine glycemic control.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 46","pages":"e40238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adhesive capsulitis (AC) is often accompanied by pain and restriction in range of movement, which long lasting symptoms often have negative impact on patients' work and lives. Since diabetes mellitus (DM) is an independent risk factor for developing AC, and AC with DM have more limitations of joint motion than general people.

Aims: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the difference of clinical efficacy between diabetes and non-diabetes, and to explore whether AC with diabetes need special intervention compared to non-diabetes.

Methods: Pubmed NCBI and Embase were searched for studies published in the last 30 years. We conducted a literature search for terms regarding AC and DM on Pubmed NCBI and Embase.

Results: A total of 9 studies eligible for inclusion. The affected shoulders in these studies ranged from 26 to 135, 460 shoulders (551 participants) in total, including 166 shoulders in diabetic group and 394 shoulders in non-diabetic/idiopathic group. Interventions included shock wave therapy, hydrodilatation, arthroscopic capsular release, manipulation under cervical nerve root block. Evaluation indicators included pain, certain shoulder questionnaires, range of motion. Positive clinical efficacy were emerged after interventions between the 2 groups. The studies that better improvement of pain in non-diabetic/idiopathic group were 2 of 6, that of certain shoulder questionnaires were 4 of 8, that of range of motion were 3 of 6.

Conclusions: Whether AC combined with DM or not, the current treatment could achieve positive clinical effectiveness and there is some statistical evidence show that the curative effect of AC combined with DM is worse than non-diabetic. In other words, the available evidence suggests that patients with DM might require additional rehabilitation measures with routine glycemic control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对糖尿病患者粘连性囊炎的干预与对非糖尿病患者的干预是否不同?系统综述。
背景:粘连性关节囊炎(AC)通常伴有疼痛和活动范围受限,长期持续的症状往往会对患者的工作和生活造成负面影响。由于糖尿病(DM)是发生粘连性关节囊炎的独立危险因素,而患有糖尿病的粘连性关节囊炎患者比普通人有更多的关节活动限制。研究目的:本研究旨在评估糖尿病与非糖尿病患者的临床疗效差异,并探讨与非糖尿病患者相比,患有糖尿病的粘连性关节囊炎患者是否需要特殊干预:方法:检索了 Pubmed NCBI 和 Embase 在过去 30 年中发表的研究。我们在 Pubmed NCBI 和 Embase 上进行了有关 AC 和 DM 的文献检索:共有 9 项研究符合纳入条件。这些研究的受累肩部从 26 到 135 不等,共有 460 个肩部(551 名参与者),其中糖尿病组 166 个肩部,非糖尿病/特发性组 394 个肩部。干预措施包括冲击波疗法、水力扩张术、关节镜关节囊松解术、颈神经根阻滞下的手法治疗。评估指标包括疼痛、特定肩关节问卷调查和活动范围。两组患者在接受干预后均取得了积极的临床疗效。非糖尿病/病变组中疼痛改善较好的研究有 6 项中的 2 项,肩部某些问卷调查有 8 项中的 4 项,活动范围有 6 项中的 3 项:结论:无论肩关节炎是否合并糖尿病,目前的治疗方法都能取得积极的临床疗效,而且有统计证据表明,肩关节炎合并糖尿病的疗效比非糖尿病差。换句话说,现有证据表明,DM 患者可能需要在常规血糖控制的基础上采取额外的康复措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A case report of rectal small-cell undifferentiated carcinoma achieved pathological complete response. Neutrophil phenotypes in prolonged labor: Implications for therapeutic strategies. Nonlinear association of alkaline phosphatase-to-albumin ratio with all-cause and cancer mortality: Evidence from NHANES 2005 to 2016. New ultrasound-guided L5 selective nerve root block puncture approach for the treatment of pain due to high-iliac-crest lumbar disc herniation: A case report. Observation on the efficacy and safety of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with preservation of the urethral mucosa from the bladder neck to the tip of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1