Impact of evolutionary relatedness on species diversification and tree shape

IF 1.9 4区 数学 Q2 BIOLOGY Journal of Theoretical Biology Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111992
Tianjian Qin , Luis Valente , Rampal S. Etienne
{"title":"Impact of evolutionary relatedness on species diversification and tree shape","authors":"Tianjian Qin ,&nbsp;Luis Valente ,&nbsp;Rampal S. Etienne","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Slowdowns in lineage accumulation are often observed in phylogenies of extant species. One explanation is the presence of ecological limits to diversity and hence to diversification. Previous research has examined whether and how species richness (SR) impacts diversification rates, but rarely considered the evolutionary relatedness (ER) between species, although ER can affect the degree of interaction between species, which likely sets these limits. To understand the influences of ER on species diversification and the interplay between SR and ER, we present a simple birth–death model in which the speciation rate depends on the ER. We use different metrics of ER that operate at different scales, ranging from branch/lineage-specific to clade-wide scales. We find that the scales at which an effect of ER operates yield distinct patterns in various tree statistics. When ER operates across the whole tree, we observe smaller and more balanced trees, with speciation rates distributed more evenly across the tips than in scenarios with lineage-specific ER effects. Importantly, we find that negative SR dependence of speciation masks the impact of ER on some of the tree statistics. Our model allows diverse evolutionary trajectories for producing imbalanced trees, which are commonly observed in empirical phylogenies but have been challenging to replicate with earlier models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","volume":"598 ","pages":"Article 111992"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519324002777","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Slowdowns in lineage accumulation are often observed in phylogenies of extant species. One explanation is the presence of ecological limits to diversity and hence to diversification. Previous research has examined whether and how species richness (SR) impacts diversification rates, but rarely considered the evolutionary relatedness (ER) between species, although ER can affect the degree of interaction between species, which likely sets these limits. To understand the influences of ER on species diversification and the interplay between SR and ER, we present a simple birth–death model in which the speciation rate depends on the ER. We use different metrics of ER that operate at different scales, ranging from branch/lineage-specific to clade-wide scales. We find that the scales at which an effect of ER operates yield distinct patterns in various tree statistics. When ER operates across the whole tree, we observe smaller and more balanced trees, with speciation rates distributed more evenly across the tips than in scenarios with lineage-specific ER effects. Importantly, we find that negative SR dependence of speciation masks the impact of ER on some of the tree statistics. Our model allows diverse evolutionary trajectories for producing imbalanced trees, which are commonly observed in empirical phylogenies but have been challenging to replicate with earlier models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进化相关性对物种多样性和树形的影响
在现存物种的系统发育过程中,经常可以观察到世系积累速度减慢的现象。一种解释是多样性存在生态限制,因此多样化也存在生态限制。以往的研究探讨了物种丰富度(SR)是否以及如何影响物种多样化率,但很少考虑物种之间的进化亲缘关系(ER),尽管ER会影响物种之间的相互作用程度,而物种之间的相互作用程度很可能设定了这些限制。为了了解ER对物种多样化的影响以及SR和ER之间的相互作用,我们提出了一个简单的出生-死亡模型,在这个模型中,物种的演化率取决于ER。我们使用了不同的ER指标,这些指标在不同的尺度上起作用,从特定的分支/系到整个类群的尺度。我们发现,ER效应在不同尺度上的作用会产生不同的树统计模式。当ER作用于整棵树时,我们观察到的树更小、更平衡,与特定世系的ER效应相比,树尖上的物种变异率分布更均匀。重要的是,我们发现物种演化的负SR依赖性掩盖了ER对某些树统计数据的影响。我们的模型允许不同的进化轨迹产生不平衡的树,这是在经验系统发生中经常观察到的现象,但在早期的模型中却很难复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Theoretical Biology is the leading forum for theoretical perspectives that give insight into biological processes. It covers a very wide range of topics and is of interest to biologists in many areas of research, including: • Brain and Neuroscience • Cancer Growth and Treatment • Cell Biology • Developmental Biology • Ecology • Evolution • Immunology, • Infectious and non-infectious Diseases, • Mathematical, Computational, Biophysical and Statistical Modeling • Microbiology, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry • Networks and Complex Systems • Physiology • Pharmacodynamics • Animal Behavior and Game Theory Acceptable papers are those that bear significant importance on the biology per se being presented, and not on the mathematical analysis. Papers that include some data or experimental material bearing on theory will be considered, including those that contain comparative study, statistical data analysis, mathematical proof, computer simulations, experiments, field observations, or even philosophical arguments, which are all methods to support or reject theoretical ideas. However, there should be a concerted effort to make papers intelligible to biologists in the chosen field.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Impact of evolutionary relatedness on species diversification and tree shape A mathematical model of microglia glucose metabolism and lactylation with positive feedback. Tradeoffs in the energetic value of neuromodulation in a closed-loop neuromechanical system. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1