Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Motivation Scale (s-CPRMS): a cross sectional study.
Mª Carmen Rodríguez-García, Esteban Montoya-Giménez, Helena Martínez-Puertas, José Miguel Garrido-Molina, Alba García-Viola, Verónica V Márquez-Hernández
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Motivation Scale (s-CPRMS): a cross sectional study.","authors":"Mª Carmen Rodríguez-García, Esteban Montoya-Giménez, Helena Martínez-Puertas, José Miguel Garrido-Molina, Alba García-Viola, Verónica V Márquez-Hernández","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02445-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac arrest remains a serious global health issue worldwide which claims for review and improvement. High motivation among resuscitators could lead to high-quality resuscitation and better outcomes. This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Motivation Scale into Spanish and assess the psychometric properties of the Spanish version (s-CPRMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of critical care and acuity-emergency physicians and nurses (N = 352) participated in an observational cross-sectional study structured in 3 phases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Face and content validity was confirmed for the s-CPRMS (s-CVI = 0.88). The ordinal alpha was 0.847, ranging from 0.796 to 0.92 for the factors, indicating good reliability and temporal stability (mean ICC = 0.701; p < 0.001). The Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) results showed the s-CPRMS was distributed into four factors that explained 58% of the variance with values of the goodness of fit indices indicating an adequate fit for the model extracted in the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA): χ2 (246) = 402.240; p < 0.001, SRMR = 0.086, RMSEA = 0.059, TLI = 0.965, CFI = 0.969, GFI = 0.990.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The s-CPRMS is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the motivation of resuscitation teams, which might lead to potential effective strategies to resuscitation quality improvement and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"23 1","pages":"845"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02445-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cardiac arrest remains a serious global health issue worldwide which claims for review and improvement. High motivation among resuscitators could lead to high-quality resuscitation and better outcomes. This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Motivation Scale into Spanish and assess the psychometric properties of the Spanish version (s-CPRMS).
Methods: A sample of critical care and acuity-emergency physicians and nurses (N = 352) participated in an observational cross-sectional study structured in 3 phases.
Results: Face and content validity was confirmed for the s-CPRMS (s-CVI = 0.88). The ordinal alpha was 0.847, ranging from 0.796 to 0.92 for the factors, indicating good reliability and temporal stability (mean ICC = 0.701; p < 0.001). The Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) results showed the s-CPRMS was distributed into four factors that explained 58% of the variance with values of the goodness of fit indices indicating an adequate fit for the model extracted in the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA): χ2 (246) = 402.240; p < 0.001, SRMR = 0.086, RMSEA = 0.059, TLI = 0.965, CFI = 0.969, GFI = 0.990.
Conclusions: The s-CPRMS is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the motivation of resuscitation teams, which might lead to potential effective strategies to resuscitation quality improvement and outcomes.
期刊介绍:
BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.