Evaluation of the effect of aging on the shear bond strength between old composite resin restoration and the repair composite resin: an in-vitro study.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Minerva dental and oral science Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6329.24.04889-7
Hafiz A Adawi, Saurabh Jain, Ahmed O Shami, Hamood M Mahdali, Ali M Kaabi, Osama B Balki, Marco Cicciù, Giuseppe Minervini
{"title":"Evaluation of the effect of aging on the shear bond strength between old composite resin restoration and the repair composite resin: an in-vitro study.","authors":"Hafiz A Adawi, Saurabh Jain, Ahmed O Shami, Hamood M Mahdali, Ali M Kaabi, Osama B Balki, Marco Cicciù, Giuseppe Minervini","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.24.04889-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of aging on the repair bond strength between old composite resin and repaired composite resin and to evaluate which type of repair composite material provides better bond strength in different time durations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty nano-hybrid composite specimens were randomly divided into four groups (N.=20) and exposed to accelerated aging from 0 to 2 years. Each group was further divided into two subgroups, A and B, repaired with packable and flowable composite respectively, after micro-abrasion treatment. Shear bond strength was assessed and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was observed that with an increase in aging time, the bond strength of both the composite materials used for repair decreased. The flowable composite's mean bond strength (22.09±0.65, 18.74±2.36, and 17.74±2.38 MPa) was more than the packable composite (21.97±0.84, 17.97±3.85, and 15.97±2.45 MPa) used for repair on aged specimens. In contrast, the bond strength of the packable was more than the flowable composite in control group specimens that were not aged (23.25±0.89 vs. 22.40±1.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As restored composites age, their bond strength decreases. Flowable composite displays better repair shear strength than packable composite as aging progresses. Micro abrasion followed by flowable composite bonding can repair aged composite restorations effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.24.04889-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of aging on the repair bond strength between old composite resin and repaired composite resin and to evaluate which type of repair composite material provides better bond strength in different time durations.

Methods: Eighty nano-hybrid composite specimens were randomly divided into four groups (N.=20) and exposed to accelerated aging from 0 to 2 years. Each group was further divided into two subgroups, A and B, repaired with packable and flowable composite respectively, after micro-abrasion treatment. Shear bond strength was assessed and statistically analyzed.

Results: It was observed that with an increase in aging time, the bond strength of both the composite materials used for repair decreased. The flowable composite's mean bond strength (22.09±0.65, 18.74±2.36, and 17.74±2.38 MPa) was more than the packable composite (21.97±0.84, 17.97±3.85, and 15.97±2.45 MPa) used for repair on aged specimens. In contrast, the bond strength of the packable was more than the flowable composite in control group specimens that were not aged (23.25±0.89 vs. 22.40±1.26).

Conclusions: As restored composites age, their bond strength decreases. Flowable composite displays better repair shear strength than packable composite as aging progresses. Micro abrasion followed by flowable composite bonding can repair aged composite restorations effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估老化对旧复合树脂修复体与修复复合树脂之间剪切粘接强度的影响:体外研究。
背景:本研究旨在评估老化对旧复合树脂和修复复合树脂之间修复粘接强度的影响,并评估哪种类型的修复复合材料在不同的时间跨度内能提供更好的粘接强度:方法:将 80 个纳米杂化复合材料试样随机分为四组(N=20),暴露于 0 至 2 年的加速老化过程中。每组又分为 A 和 B 两组,在微磨蚀处理后分别用可包装和可流动的复合材料进行修复。对剪切粘接强度进行了评估和统计分析:结果发现,随着老化时间的延长,两种修复用复合材料的粘接强度都有所下降。可流动复合材料的平均粘接强度(22.09±0.65、18.74±2.36 和 17.74±2.38 MPa)高于用于修复老化试样的可包装复合材料(21.97±0.84、17.97±3.85 和 15.97±2.45 MPa)。相比之下,在未老化的对照组试样中,可包装复合材料的粘接强度高于可流动复合材料(23.25±0.89 vs. 22.40±1.26):结论:随着修复复合材料的老化,其粘接强度会降低。随着时间的推移,可流动复合材料的修复剪切强度优于可包装复合材料。微磨后再用可流动复合材料粘接,可以有效修复老化的复合材料修复体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva dental and oral science
Minerva dental and oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
3D printed customized facemask for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a two-center case series feasibility study. AI-based prediction and classification of root caries using radiographic images. Analysis of the effects of mesh reduction of digital files on the surface area and volume accuracy of complete dentures using an intraoral scanner. Determination of red blood cell parameters for signs of iron deficiency anemia in patients with oral diseases. Early wound healing in guided bone regeneration procedures using sodium hyaluronate and a pool of amino acids: a randomized clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1