[Mini PCNL versus RIRS for renal stones: a prospective randomised controlled study].

Q4 Medicine Urologiia Pub Date : 2024-09-01
N Akopyan G, Kh Davronbekov Kh, I Tursunova F, V Shpot E, A Gazimiev M, M Rapoport L, V Glybochko P
{"title":"[Mini PCNL versus RIRS for renal stones: a prospective randomised controlled study].","authors":"N Akopyan G, Kh Davronbekov Kh, I Tursunova F, V Shpot E, A Gazimiev M, M Rapoport L, V Glybochko P","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Today it is urgent to introduce into clinical practice more advanced methods of kidney stone treatment with high indicators of their effectiveness and safety while minimizing the risk of repeated interventions. The goal of effective treatment of kidney stones is to completely rid the patient of stones and complaints, to eliminate organ dysfunction, using minimally invasive treatment methods that reduce the patients hospital stay and the risk of complications. However, there are only few studies comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of modern methods of surgical treatment of kidney stones 2 to 3 cm in size. Remote shockwave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery is the treatment of choice for kidney stones up to 2 cm, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the treatment of choice for stones larger than 2 cm. Flexible ureterorenoscopy is not recommended as first-line treatment in patients with kidney stones >2 cm due to the high risk of reintervention, according to the RTC clinical guidelines. However, it can be performed successfully in centers with extensive experience with this technique. The advantages of retrograde intrarenal surgery are low trauma, low risk of complications such as bleeding and damage to adjacent organs, and shorter hospital stay. The efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy is significantly lower for stones larger than 3 cm, and for stones between 2 and 3 cm there are only a few studies, which do not allow a reliable judgment on the efficacy and safety of this technique.</p><p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of flexible ureterorenoscopy in comparison with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones from 2 to 3 cm.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective randomized study to determine the efficacy of methods of surgical treatment of kidney stones from 2 to 3 cm in size using flexible ureterorenoscopy and mini-PCNL was conducted at the Institute of Urology and Human Reproductive Health of the I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) in Moscow. The study analyzed the results of the performed surgical interventions in patients with urolithiasis using flexible URS and mini-PCNL as an example from the point of view of their effectiveness and safety for kidney stones from 2 to 3 cm. The study utilized the results of 133 patients (including 64 patients after flexible URS and 69 patients after mini-PCNL). The mean size and mean density and location of the nodule between the groups were comparable and had no statistically significant differences. The effectiveness of the intervention in the form of complete absence of concretions, length of stay in the clinic, operative time, development of postoperative complications (bleeding, urinary tract infection) and Claviens surgical complication score were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>of the study. The duration of surgery was longer in the flexible URS group where it amounted to 69.9+/-9.3 minutes, in the mini-PCNL group the duration of surgery averaged 48.3+/-5.8 minutes (p=0.0001). The incidence of early postoperative complications in the flexible URS group was 6,2%, in the mini-PCNL group - 12,6%, which had statistically significant differences between the study groups at the level of p=0.001. The length of stay in the clinic was shorter in the flexible URS group, which averaged 2+/-1 days, while in the mini-PCNL group the length of stay was 5+/-2 days (p=0.0003). The frequency of concrement removal 3 months after the surgical intervention detected by computed tomography in the group of flexible URS was lower and amounted to 90,6%, in the group of mini-PCNL this index was at the level of 92,7% (p=0,06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study demonstrate that flexible URS and mini-PCNL have a comparable success rate in removing concretions. Flexible URS reduces hospitalization time, causes fewer complications and can be used as an alternative in the treatment of kidney stones from 2 to 3 cm. Meanwhile, mini-PCNL has shown a higher percentage of effectiveness in getting rid of concretions 3 months after surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":23546,"journal":{"name":"Urologiia","volume":" 4","pages":"11-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Today it is urgent to introduce into clinical practice more advanced methods of kidney stone treatment with high indicators of their effectiveness and safety while minimizing the risk of repeated interventions. The goal of effective treatment of kidney stones is to completely rid the patient of stones and complaints, to eliminate organ dysfunction, using minimally invasive treatment methods that reduce the patients hospital stay and the risk of complications. However, there are only few studies comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of modern methods of surgical treatment of kidney stones 2 to 3 cm in size. Remote shockwave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery is the treatment of choice for kidney stones up to 2 cm, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the treatment of choice for stones larger than 2 cm. Flexible ureterorenoscopy is not recommended as first-line treatment in patients with kidney stones >2 cm due to the high risk of reintervention, according to the RTC clinical guidelines. However, it can be performed successfully in centers with extensive experience with this technique. The advantages of retrograde intrarenal surgery are low trauma, low risk of complications such as bleeding and damage to adjacent organs, and shorter hospital stay. The efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy is significantly lower for stones larger than 3 cm, and for stones between 2 and 3 cm there are only a few studies, which do not allow a reliable judgment on the efficacy and safety of this technique.

Purpose of the study: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of flexible ureterorenoscopy in comparison with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones from 2 to 3 cm.

Materials and methods: A prospective randomized study to determine the efficacy of methods of surgical treatment of kidney stones from 2 to 3 cm in size using flexible ureterorenoscopy and mini-PCNL was conducted at the Institute of Urology and Human Reproductive Health of the I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) in Moscow. The study analyzed the results of the performed surgical interventions in patients with urolithiasis using flexible URS and mini-PCNL as an example from the point of view of their effectiveness and safety for kidney stones from 2 to 3 cm. The study utilized the results of 133 patients (including 64 patients after flexible URS and 69 patients after mini-PCNL). The mean size and mean density and location of the nodule between the groups were comparable and had no statistically significant differences. The effectiveness of the intervention in the form of complete absence of concretions, length of stay in the clinic, operative time, development of postoperative complications (bleeding, urinary tract infection) and Claviens surgical complication score were evaluated.

Results: of the study. The duration of surgery was longer in the flexible URS group where it amounted to 69.9+/-9.3 minutes, in the mini-PCNL group the duration of surgery averaged 48.3+/-5.8 minutes (p=0.0001). The incidence of early postoperative complications in the flexible URS group was 6,2%, in the mini-PCNL group - 12,6%, which had statistically significant differences between the study groups at the level of p=0.001. The length of stay in the clinic was shorter in the flexible URS group, which averaged 2+/-1 days, while in the mini-PCNL group the length of stay was 5+/-2 days (p=0.0003). The frequency of concrement removal 3 months after the surgical intervention detected by computed tomography in the group of flexible URS was lower and amounted to 90,6%, in the group of mini-PCNL this index was at the level of 92,7% (p=0,06).

Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that flexible URS and mini-PCNL have a comparable success rate in removing concretions. Flexible URS reduces hospitalization time, causes fewer complications and can be used as an alternative in the treatment of kidney stones from 2 to 3 cm. Meanwhile, mini-PCNL has shown a higher percentage of effectiveness in getting rid of concretions 3 months after surgical intervention.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[治疗肾结石的迷你 PCNL 与 RIRS:前瞻性随机对照研究]。
导言:如今,迫切需要在临床实践中引入更先进的肾结石治疗方法,这些方法的有效性和安全性指标都很高,同时还能最大限度地降低重复干预的风险。有效治疗肾结石的目标是彻底清除患者体内的结石和不适症状,消除器官功能障碍,采用微创治疗方法,减少患者住院时间和并发症风险。然而,目前只有少数研究对 2 至 3 厘米大小肾结石的现代手术治疗方法的临床疗效和安全性进行了比较。远程冲击波碎石或逆行肾内手术是治疗2厘米以下肾结石的首选方法,而经皮肾镜碎石术则是治疗大于2厘米结石的首选方法。根据 RTC 临床指南,由于再次介入治疗的风险很高,因此不建议将输尿管软镜检查作为肾结石大于 2 厘米患者的一线治疗方法。不过,在对该技术有丰富经验的中心可以成功实施。逆行肾内手术的优点是创伤小,出血和邻近器官损伤等并发症风险低,住院时间短。对于大于3厘米的结石,柔性输尿管肾镜的疗效明显较低,而对于2至3厘米的结石,目前只有少数几项研究,因此无法对该技术的疗效和安全性做出可靠的判断:研究目的:评估柔性输尿管造影术与迷你经皮肾镜取石术治疗2至3厘米肾结石的有效性和安全性:莫斯科第一国立谢切诺夫医科大学(I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University)泌尿学和人类生殖健康研究所开展了一项前瞻性随机研究,以确定使用输尿管软镜和迷你经皮肾镜手术治疗2至3厘米大小肾结石方法的疗效。该研究以柔性URS和微型PCNL为例,从其对2至3厘米肾结石的有效性和安全性角度分析了对尿路结石病人进行手术治疗的结果。该研究利用了 133 名患者(包括 64 名接受过柔性尿路造影术的患者和 69 名接受过微型 PCNL 术的患者)的结果。两组患者结石的平均大小、平均密度和位置相当,在统计学上没有显著差异。研究评估了完全无结石、住院时间、手术时间、术后并发症(出血、尿路感染)发生率和 Claviens 手术并发症评分等方面的干预效果。灵活 URS 组的手术时间更长,达到 69.9+/-9.3 分钟,而迷你 PCNL 组的手术时间平均为 48.3+/-5.8 分钟(P=0.0001)。柔性 URS 组的术后早期并发症发生率为 6.2%,迷你 PCNL 组为 12.6%,两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。柔性 URS 组的门诊停留时间较短,平均为 2+/-1 天,而微型 PCNL 组的门诊停留时间为 5+/-2 天(P=0.0003)。柔性 URS 组在手术后 3 个月通过计算机断层扫描检测到的结石清除率较低,为 90.6%,而微型 PCNL 组的这一指数为 92.7%(p=0.06):本研究结果表明,柔性 URS 和微型 PCNL 在清除结石方面的成功率相当。柔性 URS 可缩短住院时间,减少并发症,可作为治疗 2 至 3 厘米肾结石的替代方法。同时,微型 PCNL 在手术治疗 3 个月后清除结石的有效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urologiia
Urologiia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
期刊最新文献
[Experience in managing children with foreign bodies in the lower urinary tract]. [Features of histo- and angioarchitectonics of the prostate during the progression of bph and the development of its complications]. [First results of using the original urethral speculum for diagnosing chronic skenitis]. [How to help a patient with abacterial prostatitis?] [Modern optical non-invasive technologies in diagnostics of urological diseases. Literature review. Part I].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1