Challenges for staff encountering older people's existential concerns: Swedish first-line managers' views. A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1111/scs.13300
Malin Sundström, Kerstin Blomqvist, Margareta Rämgård, Anna-Karin Edberg
{"title":"Challenges for staff encountering older people's existential concerns: Swedish first-line managers' views. A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Malin Sundström, Kerstin Blomqvist, Margareta Rämgård, Anna-Karin Edberg","doi":"10.1111/scs.13300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To describe first-line managers' (FLMs) views of the challenges faced by staff when encountering older people's existential concerns in home and residential care.</p><p><strong>Methodological design and justification: </strong>This cross-sectional study uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods.</p><p><strong>Ethical issues and approval: </strong>The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (ref. number 2014/652 ) and followed the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>FLMs in home and residential care were randomly selected and invited to participate. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed online to 467 managers, 136 (29%) of whom completed it.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 80% of the FLMs reported that their staff members sometimes or frequently had conversations with the older people in their care about existential concerns, including the following topics: thoughts and feelings about meaning in life; losses and longing for meaningful relations; death, fears and uncertainty and supporting meaningful everyday life. About 75% of the managers also reported that their staff sometimes or often had conversations about existential concerns with one another. Major hindrances to existential conversations were reportedly cognitive impairment and aphasia among the older people and insecurity and unwillingness among the staff. Most managers (73%) reported that their staff received support when encountering existential concerns, mostly as individual support from managers or registered nurses.</p><p><strong>Study limitations: </strong>The main limitation of this study is its low response rate, which is common for digital surveys. Nevertheless, the sample is considered to be representative; therefore, the study holds exploratory value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regular conversations among staff, improved conversational skills and the ability to listen reflect on and perceive older people's perspective and life world are needed when encountering older people's existential concerns. FLMs play a crucial role in emphasising and planning staff support on a regular basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To describe first-line managers' (FLMs) views of the challenges faced by staff when encountering older people's existential concerns in home and residential care.

Methodological design and justification: This cross-sectional study uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods.

Ethical issues and approval: The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (ref. number 2014/652 ) and followed the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration.

Research methods: FLMs in home and residential care were randomly selected and invited to participate. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed online to 467 managers, 136 (29%) of whom completed it.

Results: About 80% of the FLMs reported that their staff members sometimes or frequently had conversations with the older people in their care about existential concerns, including the following topics: thoughts and feelings about meaning in life; losses and longing for meaningful relations; death, fears and uncertainty and supporting meaningful everyday life. About 75% of the managers also reported that their staff sometimes or often had conversations about existential concerns with one another. Major hindrances to existential conversations were reportedly cognitive impairment and aphasia among the older people and insecurity and unwillingness among the staff. Most managers (73%) reported that their staff received support when encountering existential concerns, mostly as individual support from managers or registered nurses.

Study limitations: The main limitation of this study is its low response rate, which is common for digital surveys. Nevertheless, the sample is considered to be representative; therefore, the study holds exploratory value.

Conclusion: Regular conversations among staff, improved conversational skills and the ability to listen reflect on and perceive older people's perspective and life world are needed when encountering older people's existential concerns. FLMs play a crucial role in emphasising and planning staff support on a regular basis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作人员在遇到老年人的生存问题时所面临的挑战:瑞典一线管理人员的观点。一项横断面研究。
目的和目标:描述一线管理人员(FLMs)对员工在家庭和寄宿护理中遇到老年人生存问题时所面临挑战的看法:本横断面研究采用定性和定量相结合的方法:本研究获得了瑞典伦理审查机构的批准(编号 2014/652 ),并遵循了《赫尔辛基宣言》的指导方针:研究方法:随机抽取家庭和寄宿护理中的 FLM,并邀请他们参与。467名管理人员在线填写了自填问卷,其中136人(29%)完成了问卷:结果:约 80% 的家庭护理管理者表示,他们的员工有时或经常与所护理的老年人就生存问题进行交谈,包括以下主题:对生命意义的思考和感受;失去和渴望有意义的关系;死亡、恐惧和不确定性以及支持有意义的日常生活。约 75% 的管理人员还表示,他们的员工有时会或经常会相互交流存在感问题。据报告,存在问题对话的主要障碍是老年人的认知障碍和失语症,以及工作人员的不安全感和不情愿。大多数管理人员(73%)表示,他们的员工在遇到生存问题时会得到支持,主要是来自管理人员或注册护士的个别支持:本研究的主要局限性在于回复率较低,这在数字调查中很常见。然而,样本被认为具有代表性;因此,本研究具有探索价值:结论:在遇到老年人的生存问题时,工作人员之间需要定期交谈,提高交谈技巧和倾听能力,对老年人的观点和生活世界进行反思和感知。FLM 在强调和规划工作人员的定期支持方面发挥着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Exploring young adults' experiences with food allergy during their teenage years: A practice research study. Factors influencing job satisfaction and professional competencies in clinical practice among internationally educated nurses during the migration journey: A mixed-methods systematic review. Navigating parenthood in the face of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A qualitative exploration of partner experiences. Meaning-oriented thematic analysis grounded in reflective lifeworld research-A holistic approach for caring science research. Catalysts for change: A qualitative study of middle managers' perception of nursing professional competence in primary healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1