Reward processing dominates the brain during feedback evaluation: Electrophysiological evidence.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Brain Research Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149337
Wenqi Song, Rixin Qi, Lingyao Tong, Congcong Qi, Li Li, Shiwei Jia
{"title":"Reward processing dominates the brain during feedback evaluation: Electrophysiological evidence.","authors":"Wenqi Song, Rixin Qi, Lingyao Tong, Congcong Qi, Li Li, Shiwei Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During reinforcement learning, people learn based on both positive and negative feedback. Researchers have revealed the reward positivity (RewP) that reflects positive feedback evaluation, however, no electrophysiological indicator has been found to explain negative feedback processing. In reinforcement learning, people would like to expect the positive feedback after a choice, which might explain why previous studies usually found neural responses for reward processing, while the negative feedback processing seems absent. However, no study has designed a task to separate positive and negative feedback processing to measure the corresponding electrophysiological responses. Thus, the present study designed gain processing-advantaged (GA) and loss processing-advantaged (LA) contexts using a modified gambling task to measure specific neural responses to gain processing and loss processing. Electroencephalography (EEG) data were processed using time-domain and time-frequency analyses. The results revealed the RewP and delta oscillation following gain feedback in the GA context, while no negativity or other components specific to loss processing was found, even in the loss condition of LA context. The current results indicate that reward processing dominates the brain during feedback evaluation, whereas loss processing can't be captured by electrophysiological signal.</p>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"149337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During reinforcement learning, people learn based on both positive and negative feedback. Researchers have revealed the reward positivity (RewP) that reflects positive feedback evaluation, however, no electrophysiological indicator has been found to explain negative feedback processing. In reinforcement learning, people would like to expect the positive feedback after a choice, which might explain why previous studies usually found neural responses for reward processing, while the negative feedback processing seems absent. However, no study has designed a task to separate positive and negative feedback processing to measure the corresponding electrophysiological responses. Thus, the present study designed gain processing-advantaged (GA) and loss processing-advantaged (LA) contexts using a modified gambling task to measure specific neural responses to gain processing and loss processing. Electroencephalography (EEG) data were processed using time-domain and time-frequency analyses. The results revealed the RewP and delta oscillation following gain feedback in the GA context, while no negativity or other components specific to loss processing was found, even in the loss condition of LA context. The current results indicate that reward processing dominates the brain during feedback evaluation, whereas loss processing can't be captured by electrophysiological signal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在反馈评估过程中,奖励处理在大脑中占主导地位:电生理学证据
在强化学习过程中,人们会根据正反馈进行学习。研究人员已经揭示了反映正反馈评价的奖赏积极性(RewP),但还没有发现任何电生理指标可以解释负反馈处理。在强化学习中,人们希望在做出选择后得到正反馈,这或许可以解释为什么以往的研究通常会发现奖励加工的神经反应,而负反馈加工似乎不存在。然而,目前还没有研究设计出一个将正反馈加工分开的任务来测量相应的电生理反应。因此,本研究使用改进的赌博任务设计了收益加工优势(GA)和损失加工优势(LA)情境,以测量收益加工和损失加工的特定神经反应。脑电图(EEG)数据通过时域和时频分析进行处理。结果表明,在 GA 情境下,获得反馈后会出现 RewP 和 delta 振荡,而即使在 LA 情境下的损失条件下,也没有发现损失处理特有的负性或其他成分。目前的结果表明,在反馈评估过程中,大脑的奖赏处理占主导地位,而损失处理则无法通过电生理信号捕捉到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Research
Brain Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
268
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences. Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed. With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.
期刊最新文献
Exploring DPP IV inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease: Bridging diabetes and neurodegeneration. Nrf2 activator tertiary butylhydroquinone enhances neural stem cell differentiation and implantation in Alzheimer's disease by boosting mitochondrial function. Reward processing dominates the brain during feedback evaluation: Electrophysiological evidence. Memory is improved and reflex maturation accelerated in the progeny of rat dams that consumed pequi (Caryocar Brasiliense). DLGAP3 suppresses malignant behaviors of glioma cells via inhibiting RGS12-mediated MAPK/ERK signaling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1