Revisiting the correlation between simulated and field-observed conflicts using large-scale traffic reconstruction

Abstract

Safety is a critical aspect of traffic systems. However, traditional crash data-based methods suffer from scalability and generalization issues. Although SSMs offer a proactive alternative for safety evaluation, their validation in simulated settings remains inconsistent, especially with emerging mobility technologies like autonomous driving. Our study critiques existing methodologies in SSM validation and introduces a novel framework integrating micro-level driver models with macro-level traffic states. This approach accounts for diverse external factors, including weather and geographical variations. Utilizing the Caltrans Performance Measurement System (PeMS) data, we conduct a large-scale analysis, merging traffic simulation with real-world data to extract SSMs and correlate them with crash statistics. Our results indicate a significant correlation between SSM counts and crash numbers but no clear trend with varying SSM thresholds. This suggests limitations in current public data for establishing robust links between simulated SSMs and real-world crashes. Our study highlights the need for improved data collection and simulation techniques, paving the way for more accurate and meaningful roadway safety analysis in the era of advanced mobility systems.