The Bony Density of the Pedicle Plays a More Significant Role in the Screw Anchorage Ability Than Other Regions of the Screw Trajectory.

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1111/os.14299
Zan Chen, Yue Chen, Jiajun Zhou, Yanwei He, Jingchi Li
{"title":"The Bony Density of the Pedicle Plays a More Significant Role in the Screw Anchorage Ability Than Other Regions of the Screw Trajectory.","authors":"Zan Chen, Yue Chen, Jiajun Zhou, Yanwei He, Jingchi Li","doi":"10.1111/os.14299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Osteoporosis is a crucial risk factor for screw loosening. Our studies indicate that the bone mineral density (BMD) in the screw trajectory is a better predictor of screw loosening than the BMD of the lumbar spine or the screw insertion position. Research has shown that anchorage on the screw tip is the most significant factor for screw anchorage ability, while others argue that decreased bony quality in the pedicle poses a significant risk for screw loosening. This study aimed to determine whether the bony quality of the screw tip, pedicle, or screw-anchored vertebral body plays the most significant role in screw anchorage ability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 73 patients who underwent single-segment bilateral pedicle screw fixation, along with posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF and TLIF), from March 2019 to September 2020 were included in this retrospective study. The Hounsfield unit (HU) value of the fixed vertebral bodies, the entire screw trajectory, screw tip, screw-anchoraged vertebral body, and pedicles were measured separately. Data from patients with and without screw loosening were compared, and regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC) values were computed to assess the predictive performance of different parameters. Furthermore, fixation strength was calculated in numerical models with varying bony densities in different regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HU values were found to be significantly lower in the loosening group across most measuring methods (HU values in the pedicle, 148.79 ± 97.04, 33.06 ± 34.82, p < 0.001). Specifically, the AUC of screw loosening prediction was notably higher when using HU values of the pedicle compared to other methods (AUC in the pedicle > 0.9 and in the screw insertion position > 0.7). Additionally, computational results for fixation strength revealed a clear decline in screw anchorage ability in models with poor BMD in the pedicle region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pedicle bone quality plays a more significant role in screw anchorage ability than that in other regions. The innovation of bony augmentation strategies should pay more attention to this region to optimize the screw anchorage ability effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14299","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Osteoporosis is a crucial risk factor for screw loosening. Our studies indicate that the bone mineral density (BMD) in the screw trajectory is a better predictor of screw loosening than the BMD of the lumbar spine or the screw insertion position. Research has shown that anchorage on the screw tip is the most significant factor for screw anchorage ability, while others argue that decreased bony quality in the pedicle poses a significant risk for screw loosening. This study aimed to determine whether the bony quality of the screw tip, pedicle, or screw-anchored vertebral body plays the most significant role in screw anchorage ability.

Methods: A total of 73 patients who underwent single-segment bilateral pedicle screw fixation, along with posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF and TLIF), from March 2019 to September 2020 were included in this retrospective study. The Hounsfield unit (HU) value of the fixed vertebral bodies, the entire screw trajectory, screw tip, screw-anchoraged vertebral body, and pedicles were measured separately. Data from patients with and without screw loosening were compared, and regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC) values were computed to assess the predictive performance of different parameters. Furthermore, fixation strength was calculated in numerical models with varying bony densities in different regions.

Results: HU values were found to be significantly lower in the loosening group across most measuring methods (HU values in the pedicle, 148.79 ± 97.04, 33.06 ± 34.82, p < 0.001). Specifically, the AUC of screw loosening prediction was notably higher when using HU values of the pedicle compared to other methods (AUC in the pedicle > 0.9 and in the screw insertion position > 0.7). Additionally, computational results for fixation strength revealed a clear decline in screw anchorage ability in models with poor BMD in the pedicle region.

Conclusions: Pedicle bone quality plays a more significant role in screw anchorage ability than that in other regions. The innovation of bony augmentation strategies should pay more attention to this region to optimize the screw anchorage ability effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与螺钉轨迹的其他区域相比,椎弓根的骨质密度对螺钉锚定能力的影响更大。
目的:骨质疏松症是导致螺钉松动的重要风险因素。我们的研究表明,与腰椎的骨密度或螺钉插入位置相比,螺钉轨迹上的骨密度(BMD)更能预测螺钉松动。研究表明,螺钉顶端的锚定是影响螺钉锚定能力的最重要因素,而另一些研究则认为,椎弓根骨质的下降是螺钉松动的重要风险因素。本研究旨在确定螺钉尖端、椎弓根或螺钉锚定椎体的骨质对螺钉锚定能力的影响最大:本回顾性研究共纳入2019年3月至2020年9月期间接受单节段双侧椎弓根螺钉固定术以及后路和经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF和TLIF)的73例患者。分别测量了固定椎体、整个螺钉轨迹、螺钉尖端、螺钉锚定椎体和椎弓根的 HU 值。对有螺钉松动和无螺钉松动患者的数据进行比较,并进行回归分析以确定独立的风险因素。此外,还计算了曲线下面积(AUC)值,以评估不同参数的预测性能。此外,还在不同区域不同骨密度的数值模型中计算了固定强度:在大多数测量方法中,松动组的 HU 值明显较低(椎弓根 HU 值为 148.79 ± 97.04,33.06 ± 34.82,P 0.9,螺钉插入位置 HU 值 > 0.7)。此外,对固定强度的计算结果显示,在椎弓根部位 BMD 较差的模型中,螺钉锚固能力明显下降:结论:与其他区域相比,椎弓根骨质量对螺钉锚固能力的影响更为显著。结论:与其他区域相比,椎弓根骨质量对螺钉锚固能力的影响更为显著,骨质增强策略的创新应更多地关注这一区域,以有效优化螺钉锚固能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
期刊最新文献
Observation of the Clinical Efficacy of Self-Modified Skin-Stretching Device in the Treatment of Soft-Tissue Defects of the Heel: A Retrospective Single-Arm Cohort Study. How Accurately Does Bone Mineral Density Predict Bone Strength? A Clinical Observational Study of Osteoporosis Vertebral Compression Fractures in Postmenopausal Women. Comparison of Therapeutic Effects of Different Rehabilitation Methods on Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pear-Shaped Disc as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Sclerotic Modic Changes After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Research Progress on the Posterior Midline Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1