Put a bet on it: Can self-funded commitment contracts curb fitness procrastination?

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102943
Devon Spika, Linnea Wickström Östervall, Ulf Gerdtham, Erik Wengström
{"title":"Put a bet on it: Can self-funded commitment contracts curb fitness procrastination?","authors":"Devon Spika, Linnea Wickström Östervall, Ulf Gerdtham, Erik Wengström","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigate the use of a highly scalable intervention to help individuals achieve their physical activity goals: self-funded commitment contracts. Using a randomised experiment, we compare the effect of soft (non-incentivised) and hard (incentivised) contracts among 1629 members of a gym in Stockholm, Sweden. We find a significant positive impact of being offered a hard contract on monthly visits to the gym and the probability of meeting one's contract goal. Relative to the control group, being offered a hard contract significantly increases gym visits by 21%, while being offered a soft contract leads to an 8% increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"98 ","pages":"102943"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102943","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate the use of a highly scalable intervention to help individuals achieve their physical activity goals: self-funded commitment contracts. Using a randomised experiment, we compare the effect of soft (non-incentivised) and hard (incentivised) contracts among 1629 members of a gym in Stockholm, Sweden. We find a significant positive impact of being offered a hard contract on monthly visits to the gym and the probability of meeting one's contract goal. Relative to the control group, being offered a hard contract significantly increases gym visits by 21%, while being offered a soft contract leads to an 8% increase.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赌一把自费承诺合同能否遏制健身拖延症?
我们研究了如何利用一种高度可扩展的干预措施来帮助个人实现体育锻炼目标:自费承诺合同。通过随机试验,我们在瑞典斯德哥尔摩一家健身房的 1629 名会员中比较了软(无激励)合同和硬(有激励)合同的效果。我们发现,硬性合同对健身房月访问量和达到合同目标的概率有明显的积极影响。与对照组相比,签订硬性合同会使健身房的访问量大幅增加 21%,而签订软性合同则会使访问量增加 8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Economics
Journal of Health Economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks articles related to the economics of health and medical care. Its scope will include the following topics: Production and supply of health services; Demand and utilization of health services; Financing of health services; Determinants of health, including investments in health and risky health behaviors; Economic consequences of ill-health; Behavioral models of demanders, suppliers and other health care agencies; Evaluation of policy interventions that yield economic insights; Efficiency and distributional aspects of health policy; and such other topics as the Editors may deem appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Universal free school meals and children's bodyweight. Impacts by age and duration of exposure. Put a bet on it: Can self-funded commitment contracts curb fitness procrastination? Universal Credit: Welfare reform and mental health Health implications of housing retrofits: Evidence from a population-wide weatherization program Do mandatory waiting periods for abortion increase intimate partner violence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1