Agricultural mosaics offer nesting habitat to dabbling ducks in the arid Intermountain West of the United States

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70072
Casey M. Setash, Adam C. Behney, James H. Gammonley, Liba Pejchar, Matt A. Reddy, David N. Koons
{"title":"Agricultural mosaics offer nesting habitat to dabbling ducks in the arid Intermountain West of the United States","authors":"Casey M. Setash,&nbsp;Adam C. Behney,&nbsp;James H. Gammonley,&nbsp;Liba Pejchar,&nbsp;Matt A. Reddy,&nbsp;David N. Koons","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The debate over the best agricultural practices for biological conservation often focuses on the degree to which agricultural lands should be interspersed with desirable habitat versus protecting lands entirely from production. It is important to understand the benefits agriculture provides for wildlife because it is consuming an increasing proportion of the landscape. We evaluated the nesting ecology of breeding ducks within a mosaic of flood-irrigated conservation areas and agricultural lands in hay production. We assessed how habitat features at two spatial scales across these lands were related to nest site selection, nest density, and nest survival of multiple duck species. Birds selected nest sites with higher visual obstruction, a higher proportion of shrubs around the nest, and less bare ground, but we did not detect evidence of selection per se at larger spatial scales. Nest density was marginally higher along linear features, including irrigation ditches and riparian stretches, but nest survival remained similar across land-use types and habitats features. This system is representative of many agricultural landscapes around the globe and highlights the ways agroecosystems can be managed to maintain habitat suitability for wildlife on working lands.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70072","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The debate over the best agricultural practices for biological conservation often focuses on the degree to which agricultural lands should be interspersed with desirable habitat versus protecting lands entirely from production. It is important to understand the benefits agriculture provides for wildlife because it is consuming an increasing proportion of the landscape. We evaluated the nesting ecology of breeding ducks within a mosaic of flood-irrigated conservation areas and agricultural lands in hay production. We assessed how habitat features at two spatial scales across these lands were related to nest site selection, nest density, and nest survival of multiple duck species. Birds selected nest sites with higher visual obstruction, a higher proportion of shrubs around the nest, and less bare ground, but we did not detect evidence of selection per se at larger spatial scales. Nest density was marginally higher along linear features, including irrigation ditches and riparian stretches, but nest survival remained similar across land-use types and habitats features. This system is representative of many agricultural landscapes around the globe and highlights the ways agroecosystems can be managed to maintain habitat suitability for wildlife on working lands.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国干旱的西部中山区,农业镶嵌图案为雏鸭提供了筑巢栖息地
关于生物保护的最佳农业实践的争论往往集中在农用地应在多大程度上与理想的栖息地相交错,而不是保护土地完全免于生产。了解农业为野生动物带来的益处非常重要,因为农业正在消耗越来越多的景观。我们评估了繁殖鸭在洪水灌溉保护区和干草生产农田镶嵌区内的筑巢生态。我们评估了这些土地上两种空间尺度的栖息地特征与多种鸭类的巢址选择、巢密度和巢存活率之间的关系。鸟类选择视觉障碍较高、巢周围灌木比例较高和裸露地面较少的巢址,但我们没有发现鸟类在更大空间尺度上选择巢址的证据。沿灌溉沟渠和河岸地带等线性特征的巢密度略高,但不同土地利用类型和生境特征的巢存活率相似。该系统代表了全球许多农业景观,并强调了农业生态系统的管理方法,以保持野生动物在农田中的栖息地适宜性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
How often are ecosystems top-down controlled? Experiments in grassland, grasshopper, and bird systems over time and space Agricultural mosaics offer nesting habitat to dabbling ducks in the arid Intermountain West of the United States Daily and seasonal variations of soil respiration from maize field under different water treatments in North China Tree damage risk across gradients in tree species richness and stand age: Implications for adaptive forest management Forest disturbance shapes habitat selection but not migratory tendency for partially migratory ungulates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1