A scoping review of protein biomarkers for schizophrenia: state of progress, underlying biology, and methodological considerations.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105949
Caio Henrique de Souza Ferreira Berdeville, Danyelle Silva-Amaral, Paulo Dalgalarrondo, Claudio E M Banzato, Daniel Martins-De-Souza
{"title":"A scoping review of protein biomarkers for schizophrenia: state of progress, underlying biology, and methodological considerations.","authors":"Caio Henrique de Souza Ferreira Berdeville, Danyelle Silva-Amaral, Paulo Dalgalarrondo, Claudio E M Banzato, Daniel Martins-De-Souza","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schizophrenia is characterized by symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, and avolition. The diagnosis is clinical, based on interviews and the main treatment involves antipsychotics. Currently, given the lack of clinically applicable biomarkers for schizophrenia, there is no molecular test based on its biological mechanisms to assist psychiatrists either in the prediction or diagnosis of the disorder, nor to measure medication efficacy. This scoping review assessed original articles in English about protein biomarkers for schizophrenia with samples that could be used in a clinical context, classifying them into diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutics, risk for psychosis, and side-effects. The search was conducted on PubMed and key findings were inserted on a summary table. We discussed the methodologies used in these papers, suggested protein panels for validation in longitudinal research, and proposed a hypothesis to explain the observed variability in results. This heterogeneity is explored in light of the debated validity of this construct, applying recent discussions and the disorder's history. Our data suggest that there is insufficient evidence to integrate protein biomarkers into clinical psychiatry for schizophrenia, not due to study quality, but possibly due to flaws in the current diagnostic system. We propose exploring alternative categorization systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"105949"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105949","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schizophrenia is characterized by symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, and avolition. The diagnosis is clinical, based on interviews and the main treatment involves antipsychotics. Currently, given the lack of clinically applicable biomarkers for schizophrenia, there is no molecular test based on its biological mechanisms to assist psychiatrists either in the prediction or diagnosis of the disorder, nor to measure medication efficacy. This scoping review assessed original articles in English about protein biomarkers for schizophrenia with samples that could be used in a clinical context, classifying them into diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutics, risk for psychosis, and side-effects. The search was conducted on PubMed and key findings were inserted on a summary table. We discussed the methodologies used in these papers, suggested protein panels for validation in longitudinal research, and proposed a hypothesis to explain the observed variability in results. This heterogeneity is explored in light of the debated validity of this construct, applying recent discussions and the disorder's history. Our data suggest that there is insufficient evidence to integrate protein biomarkers into clinical psychiatry for schizophrenia, not due to study quality, but possibly due to flaws in the current diagnostic system. We propose exploring alternative categorization systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂症蛋白质生物标记物范围综述:进展状况、基础生物学和方法学考虑因素。
精神分裂症以妄想、幻觉和幻视等症状为特征。临床诊断以面谈为基础,主要治疗方法是服用抗精神病药物。目前,由于缺乏适用于临床的精神分裂症生物标志物,还没有基于其生物机制的分子检测方法来帮助精神科医生预测或诊断精神分裂症,也无法衡量药物疗效。本范围界定综述评估了有关可用于临床的精神分裂症蛋白质生物标记物样本的英文原创文章,并将其分为诊断、预后、治疗、精神病风险和副作用等类别。我们在 PubMed 上进行了搜索,并在摘要表中列出了主要发现。我们讨论了这些论文中使用的方法,提出了在纵向研究中验证蛋白质面板的建议,并提出了一个假设来解释观察到的结果差异。我们根据对这一结构的有效性的争论,应用最近的讨论和该疾病的历史,对这种异质性进行了探讨。我们的数据表明,将蛋白质生物标记物纳入精神分裂症临床精神病学的证据不足,这并不是因为研究质量的问题,而可能是由于当前诊断系统的缺陷。我们建议探索其他分类系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of protein biomarkers for schizophrenia: state of progress, underlying biology, and methodological considerations. Dream function and dream amnesia: dissolution of an apparent paradox. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of ovarian steroid hormones II: Regulation of sexual behavior in female rodents. Human-directed sociability in the domestic dog: a Tinbergian approach. Altered value-based decision-making in anorexia nervosa: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1