Caio Henrique de Souza Ferreira Berdeville, Danyelle Silva-Amaral, Paulo Dalgalarrondo, Claudio E M Banzato, Daniel Martins-De-Souza
{"title":"A scoping review of protein biomarkers for schizophrenia: state of progress, underlying biology, and methodological considerations.","authors":"Caio Henrique de Souza Ferreira Berdeville, Danyelle Silva-Amaral, Paulo Dalgalarrondo, Claudio E M Banzato, Daniel Martins-De-Souza","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schizophrenia is characterized by symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, and avolition. The diagnosis is clinical, based on interviews and the main treatment involves antipsychotics. Currently, given the lack of clinically applicable biomarkers for schizophrenia, there is no molecular test based on its biological mechanisms to assist psychiatrists either in the prediction or diagnosis of the disorder, nor to measure medication efficacy. This scoping review assessed original articles in English about protein biomarkers for schizophrenia with samples that could be used in a clinical context, classifying them into diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutics, risk for psychosis, and side-effects. The search was conducted on PubMed and key findings were inserted on a summary table. We discussed the methodologies used in these papers, suggested protein panels for validation in longitudinal research, and proposed a hypothesis to explain the observed variability in results. This heterogeneity is explored in light of the debated validity of this construct, applying recent discussions and the disorder's history. Our data suggest that there is insufficient evidence to integrate protein biomarkers into clinical psychiatry for schizophrenia, not due to study quality, but possibly due to flaws in the current diagnostic system. We propose exploring alternative categorization systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"105949"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105949","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Schizophrenia is characterized by symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, and avolition. The diagnosis is clinical, based on interviews and the main treatment involves antipsychotics. Currently, given the lack of clinically applicable biomarkers for schizophrenia, there is no molecular test based on its biological mechanisms to assist psychiatrists either in the prediction or diagnosis of the disorder, nor to measure medication efficacy. This scoping review assessed original articles in English about protein biomarkers for schizophrenia with samples that could be used in a clinical context, classifying them into diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutics, risk for psychosis, and side-effects. The search was conducted on PubMed and key findings were inserted on a summary table. We discussed the methodologies used in these papers, suggested protein panels for validation in longitudinal research, and proposed a hypothesis to explain the observed variability in results. This heterogeneity is explored in light of the debated validity of this construct, applying recent discussions and the disorder's history. Our data suggest that there is insufficient evidence to integrate protein biomarkers into clinical psychiatry for schizophrenia, not due to study quality, but possibly due to flaws in the current diagnostic system. We propose exploring alternative categorization systems.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.