Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of birth defects mediated by multifetal pregnancy: evidence from the China Birth Cohort Study.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2024.11.017
Ruohua Yan, Shen Gao, Xiaohang Liu, Ruixia Liu, Shaofei Su, Yaguang Peng, Xiaolu Nie, Enjie Zhang, Shuanghua Xie, Jianhui Liu, Yue Zhang, Wentao Yue, Xiaoxia Peng, Chenghong Yin
{"title":"Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of birth defects mediated by multifetal pregnancy: evidence from the China Birth Cohort Study.","authors":"Ruohua Yan, Shen Gao, Xiaohang Liu, Ruixia Liu, Shaofei Su, Yaguang Peng, Xiaolu Nie, Enjie Zhang, Shuanghua Xie, Jianhui Liu, Yue Zhang, Wentao Yue, Xiaoxia Peng, Chenghong Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.11.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both assisted reproductive technology (ART) and multifetal pregnancy have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of birth defects (BDs). However, it is unclear whether multifetal pregnancy is a mediator that increases the risk of BDs in ART-conceived pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the risk of BDs associated with ART, and to quantify the mediating effect of multifetal pregnancy between ART and BDs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>From November 2017 to August 2021, 132,386 pregnant women from 50 study sites in 17 provinces of China were monitored from their first trimester until delivery (or miscarriage/termination). BDs were detected in both live births and stillbirths. Directed acyclic graph was drawn to understand the causal relationship between ART and BDs, and inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for confounders. Then, log-binomial generalized estimating equation was established in the inverse probability weighted cohort to estimate the adjusted relative risk (RR) of BDs associated with ART compared to natural conception, while addressing the cluster effect of study sites. Mediation analysis was performed to assess the mediating effect of multifetal pregnancy between ART and BDs. Number needed to harm was calculated for multifetal pregnancy versus singleton pregnancy among ART-conceived pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126,035 naturally conceived and 5124 ART-conceived pregnancies were included in the analysis. The incidence of BDs in the ART conception group (4.2%) was significantly higher than that in the natural conception group (2.5%), with an adjusted RR of 1.48 (95% CI, 1.24 to 1.78). Multifetal pregnancies were also more common in the ART conception group (21.4%) than the natural conception group (1.1%). Mediation through multifetal pregnancy accounted for 25% of the risk of BDs associated with ART. Notably, if ART-conceived pregnant women could have singleton pregnancy rather than multifetal pregnancy, one case of BDs could be potentially avoided for every 52 (95% CI, 29 to 233) pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multifetal pregnancy mediated the effect of ART on BDs. Therefore, when ART treatment is needed, single embryo transfer should be considered under clinically feasible conditions for the prevention of BDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.11.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both assisted reproductive technology (ART) and multifetal pregnancy have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of birth defects (BDs). However, it is unclear whether multifetal pregnancy is a mediator that increases the risk of BDs in ART-conceived pregnancies.

Objectives: To investigate the risk of BDs associated with ART, and to quantify the mediating effect of multifetal pregnancy between ART and BDs.

Study design: From November 2017 to August 2021, 132,386 pregnant women from 50 study sites in 17 provinces of China were monitored from their first trimester until delivery (or miscarriage/termination). BDs were detected in both live births and stillbirths. Directed acyclic graph was drawn to understand the causal relationship between ART and BDs, and inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for confounders. Then, log-binomial generalized estimating equation was established in the inverse probability weighted cohort to estimate the adjusted relative risk (RR) of BDs associated with ART compared to natural conception, while addressing the cluster effect of study sites. Mediation analysis was performed to assess the mediating effect of multifetal pregnancy between ART and BDs. Number needed to harm was calculated for multifetal pregnancy versus singleton pregnancy among ART-conceived pregnancies.

Results: A total of 126,035 naturally conceived and 5124 ART-conceived pregnancies were included in the analysis. The incidence of BDs in the ART conception group (4.2%) was significantly higher than that in the natural conception group (2.5%), with an adjusted RR of 1.48 (95% CI, 1.24 to 1.78). Multifetal pregnancies were also more common in the ART conception group (21.4%) than the natural conception group (1.1%). Mediation through multifetal pregnancy accounted for 25% of the risk of BDs associated with ART. Notably, if ART-conceived pregnant women could have singleton pregnancy rather than multifetal pregnancy, one case of BDs could be potentially avoided for every 52 (95% CI, 29 to 233) pregnancies.

Conclusions: Multifetal pregnancy mediated the effect of ART on BDs. Therefore, when ART treatment is needed, single embryo transfer should be considered under clinically feasible conditions for the prevention of BDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助生殖技术与多胎妊娠导致出生缺陷的风险:来自中国出生队列研究的证据。
背景:据报道,辅助生殖技术(ART)和多胎妊娠都与出生缺陷(BDs)风险增加有关。然而,目前尚不清楚多胎妊娠是否是增加 ART 妊娠中出生缺陷风险的中介因素:研究设计:2017年11月至2021年8月,来自中国17个省份50个研究点的132386名孕妇从怀孕头三个月开始接受监测,直至分娩(或流产/终止妊娠)。在活产和死产中都检测到了BDs。为了解抗逆转录病毒疗法与 BDs 之间的因果关系,绘制了有向无环图,并使用逆概率治疗加权法调整混杂因素。然后,在逆概率加权队列中建立了对数二项式广义估计方程,以估计与自然受孕相比,抗逆转录病毒疗法与死胎之间的调整相对风险(RR),同时考虑研究地点的群集效应。为评估多胎妊娠在抗逆转录病毒疗法与 BDs 之间的中介效应,进行了中介分析。在抗逆转录病毒疗法受孕的孕妇中,计算了多胎妊娠与单胎妊娠的伤害需要数:共有 126035 例自然受孕和 5124 例 ART 受孕的孕妇被纳入分析。ART 受孕组的 BD 发生率(4.2%)明显高于自然受孕组(2.5%),调整后的 RR 为 1.48(95% CI,1.24 至 1.78)。ART 受孕组的多胎妊娠率(21.4%)也高于自然受孕组(1.1%)。在与 ART 相关的 BDs 风险中,多胎妊娠占 25%。值得注意的是,如果抗逆转录病毒疗法受孕的孕妇可以单胎妊娠而不是多胎妊娠,那么每52例(95% CI,29-233)妊娠就有可能避免一例BDs:结论:多胎妊娠是抗逆转录病毒疗法对 BDs 影响的中介。因此,当需要进行 ART 治疗时,应在临床可行的条件下考虑单胚胎移植,以预防 BDs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Clinical application of nanopore-based DNA sequencing for rapid, point-of-care, 24-chromosome aneuploidy testing of products of conception following a pregnancy loss. Cardiac structural, functional and energetic assessments during and after pregnancy in women with gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia and healthy pregnancy. Assessing Aspirin Dosing for Pre-eclampsia Prevention: Clarifying Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of birth defects mediated by multifetal pregnancy: evidence from the China Birth Cohort Study. DORA: Comparing 75 mg vs 150 mg aspirin in pregnant women at risk of pre-eclampsia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1