Effect of forest thinning on the diversity and composition of macrofungal sporocarps in Pinus uncinata stands

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122385
Ángel Ponce , Maitane Erdozain , Josu G. Alday , José Antonio Bonet , Juan Martínez de Aragón , Sergio de-Miguel
{"title":"Effect of forest thinning on the diversity and composition of macrofungal sporocarps in Pinus uncinata stands","authors":"Ángel Ponce ,&nbsp;Maitane Erdozain ,&nbsp;Josu G. Alday ,&nbsp;José Antonio Bonet ,&nbsp;Juan Martínez de Aragón ,&nbsp;Sergio de-Miguel","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pine forests represent globally distributed conifers growing in a wide range of habitats within the Mediterranean basin. One example are the high-altitude mountain pine (<em>Pinus uncinata</em>) forests in the Pyrenees, which stand out for their high fungal sporocarps richness. Nevertheless, studies on the effects of forest management on sporocarps diversity in mountain pine forests have been lacking, despite their importance for optimizing multiple-use forestry practices. To address this gap, we analysed the impact of different thinning intensities on fungal sporocarp diversity and composition in <em>P. uncinata</em> stands in the Pyrenees. The experimental design involved a BACI approach used to compare annual sporocarp diversity and composition five years before and three years after the thinning intervention in 18 permanent plots (9 thinned and 9 control). The results indicated an absence of a thinning effect in the lighter thinning intensities (&lt; 25 % of basal area removal) for the sporocarp richness, while negative effects emerged steadily when increasing the thinning intensity until a clear negative effect reported when removing more than 70 % of the basal area. Sporocarp evenness and Shannon index revealed a negative effect due to forest thinning, with a dominance of some species that can cope with the new stand conditions. The ECM sporocarp composition was mainly affected by interannual variability, while the saprotrophic sporocarp composition was mainly driven by site conditions. However, in both guilds, we detected a reduction of the sporocarps fructification in the higher thinning intensities. Our results indicate that lighter thinning intensities do not compromise fungal diversity conservation. Finally, forest management practices that balance timber production and fungal diversity could create opportunities to enhance the ecological, social and economic value of these forest stands, which have historically been managed exclusively for timber purposes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"576 ","pages":"Article 122385"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724006972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pine forests represent globally distributed conifers growing in a wide range of habitats within the Mediterranean basin. One example are the high-altitude mountain pine (Pinus uncinata) forests in the Pyrenees, which stand out for their high fungal sporocarps richness. Nevertheless, studies on the effects of forest management on sporocarps diversity in mountain pine forests have been lacking, despite their importance for optimizing multiple-use forestry practices. To address this gap, we analysed the impact of different thinning intensities on fungal sporocarp diversity and composition in P. uncinata stands in the Pyrenees. The experimental design involved a BACI approach used to compare annual sporocarp diversity and composition five years before and three years after the thinning intervention in 18 permanent plots (9 thinned and 9 control). The results indicated an absence of a thinning effect in the lighter thinning intensities (< 25 % of basal area removal) for the sporocarp richness, while negative effects emerged steadily when increasing the thinning intensity until a clear negative effect reported when removing more than 70 % of the basal area. Sporocarp evenness and Shannon index revealed a negative effect due to forest thinning, with a dominance of some species that can cope with the new stand conditions. The ECM sporocarp composition was mainly affected by interannual variability, while the saprotrophic sporocarp composition was mainly driven by site conditions. However, in both guilds, we detected a reduction of the sporocarps fructification in the higher thinning intensities. Our results indicate that lighter thinning intensities do not compromise fungal diversity conservation. Finally, forest management practices that balance timber production and fungal diversity could create opportunities to enhance the ecological, social and economic value of these forest stands, which have historically been managed exclusively for timber purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
森林疏伐对松林中大型真菌孢子块的多样性和组成的影响
松树林是全球分布的针叶树,生长在地中海盆地的各种栖息地。比利牛斯山脉的高海拔山地松林(Pinus uncinata)就是一例,其真菌孢子块的丰富程度非常突出。然而,尽管山地松林对优化多用途林业实践非常重要,但有关森林管理对山地松林孢子虫多样性影响的研究却一直缺乏。为了填补这一空白,我们分析了不同疏伐强度对比利牛斯山松林真菌孢子茧多样性和组成的影响。实验设计采用 BACI 方法,在 18 个永久性地块(9 个疏伐地块和 9 个对照地块)中比较疏伐干预前五年和后三年的孢子囊多样性和组成。结果表明,在较轻的疏伐强度下(移除 25% 的基部面积),孢子囊丰富度没有受到疏伐的影响,而随着疏伐强度的增加,负面影响逐渐显现,当移除 70% 以上的基部面积时,出现了明显的负面影响。孢子体均匀度和香农指数显示,森林疏伐会产生负面影响,一些能适应新林分条件的物种会占据优势。ECM 孢子体组成主要受年际变化的影响,而吸液孢子体组成主要受地点条件的驱动。不过,在这两个类群中,我们发现在较高的疏伐强度下,孢子体果实减少。我们的研究结果表明,较低的疏伐强度不会影响真菌多样性的保护。最后,兼顾木材生产和真菌多样性的森林管理方法可以为提高这些林分的生态、社会和经济价值创造机会,因为这些林分在历史上一直只用于木材管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Long-term impacts of nurse plants on evergreen and deciduous oak saplings in Northern California Rational eucalypt logging site management patterns enhance soil phosphorus bioavailability and reshape phoD-harboring bacterial community structure Contrasting responses of bats and macro-moths to structural complexity in forest borders Multi-scale forest heterogeneity promotes occupancy of dusky-footed woodrats in the Sierra Nevada Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1