Gatekeeping in primary care: Analysing GP referral patterns and specialist consultations in the NHS

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Modelling Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106925
Federico Innocenti , Barry McCormick , Catia Nicodemo
{"title":"Gatekeeping in primary care: Analysing GP referral patterns and specialist consultations in the NHS","authors":"Federico Innocenti ,&nbsp;Barry McCormick ,&nbsp;Catia Nicodemo","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the impact of increasing the number of gatekeeper General Practitioners (GPs) on referral rates and specialist treatments. Gatekeeping is a supply-side strategy implemented to control health expenditure and improve efficiency by limiting patient access to services below marginal cost. It aims to address specialist moral hazard by reducing the overuse of expensive diagnostics and replacing them with more cost-effective GP diagnostic information. Using administrative data from 2004 to 2011, we examine whether the availability of gatekeeper GPs in local areas is associated with changes in outpatient referrals and elective admissions. Our findings reveal that increasing GP supply in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas leads to a decrease in both outpatient referrals and elective admissions. However, these effects are less pronounced in prosperous areas or regions with high GP referral rates. Interestingly, we observe that having more GP practices in a specific area implies higher referral rates and elective admissions. These findings offer valuable insights that can assist policymakers in crafting targeted policies to effectively reduce healthcare costs and enhance the overall efficiency of the health system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 106925"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999324002827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of increasing the number of gatekeeper General Practitioners (GPs) on referral rates and specialist treatments. Gatekeeping is a supply-side strategy implemented to control health expenditure and improve efficiency by limiting patient access to services below marginal cost. It aims to address specialist moral hazard by reducing the overuse of expensive diagnostics and replacing them with more cost-effective GP diagnostic information. Using administrative data from 2004 to 2011, we examine whether the availability of gatekeeper GPs in local areas is associated with changes in outpatient referrals and elective admissions. Our findings reveal that increasing GP supply in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas leads to a decrease in both outpatient referrals and elective admissions. However, these effects are less pronounced in prosperous areas or regions with high GP referral rates. Interestingly, we observe that having more GP practices in a specific area implies higher referral rates and elective admissions. These findings offer valuable insights that can assist policymakers in crafting targeted policies to effectively reduce healthcare costs and enhance the overall efficiency of the health system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健中的把关:分析全科医生转诊模式和国家医疗服务体系中的专家会诊
本研究调查了增加把关全科医生(GP)人数对转诊率和专科治疗的影响。把关是一种供应方策略,旨在通过限制患者获得低于边际成本的服务来控制医疗支出和提高效率。其目的是通过减少过度使用昂贵的诊断方法,并以更具成本效益的全科医生诊断信息取而代之,从而解决专科医生的道德风险问题。利用 2004 年至 2011 年的行政数据,我们研究了当地全科医生守门人的可用性是否与门诊转诊和择期入院的变化有关。我们的研究结果表明,在社会经济条件较差的地区,全科医生供应量的增加会导致门诊转诊和择期入院人数的减少。然而,这些影响在繁荣地区或全科医生转诊率高的地区并不明显。有趣的是,我们发现在特定地区拥有更多的全科医生诊所意味着更高的转诊率和择期入院率。这些发现提供了宝贵的见解,有助于决策者制定有针对性的政策,有效降低医疗成本,提高医疗系统的整体效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Modelling
Economic Modelling ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.60%
发文量
295
期刊介绍: Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.
期刊最新文献
Did the American Rescue Plan cause inflation? A synthetic control approach Grandchild care and grandparents’ labor supply Editorial Board The cyclicality of the finance premium over the business cycle Disentangling the heterogeneous effect of natural resources on economic growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1