Deep learning-driven land cover monitoring and landscape ecological health assessment: A dynamic study in coastal regions of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor from 2000 to 2023

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112860
Chen Xu , Juanle Wang , Yamin Sun , Meng Liu , Jingxuan Liu , Meer Muhammad Sajjad
{"title":"Deep learning-driven land cover monitoring and landscape ecological health assessment: A dynamic study in coastal regions of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor from 2000 to 2023","authors":"Chen Xu ,&nbsp;Juanle Wang ,&nbsp;Yamin Sun ,&nbsp;Meng Liu ,&nbsp;Jingxuan Liu ,&nbsp;Meer Muhammad Sajjad","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The coastal regions of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) are crucial links for the “21st Century Maritime Silk Road”. Nonetheless, this region is facing significant ecological challenges due to natural disasters and intensive human activity. To effectively monitor and assess the ecological health of these critical coastal zones, this study employed integrated labels and a deep learning model to obtain land cover data spanning from 2000 to 2023. It then constructed a vigour-organisation-resilience (VOR) model with 12 assessment indicators to evaluate the landscape ecological health of this region. The evaluation results showed distinct spatial patterns. Gwadar and Ormara’s “Bare land” areas remained “Sick,” while Karachi and Lower Indus’ “Impervious surfaces” were “Unhealthy” with minimal fluctuations. The Lower Indus region saw “Sub-healthy” expansion with increased “Crops” areas. Lasbela was “Healthy,” dominated by shrub-based “Other vegetation,” and the Indus Delta’s mangroves maintained a “Very healthy” state. Overall, the CPEC coastal regions were rated “Unhealthy,” with signs of moderate improvement. We recommend that the CPEC coastal areas focus on restoring “Sick” areas, promoting sustainable agriculture in “Sub-healthy” regions, and conserving “Healthy” and “Very healthy” areas. This study demonstrates the efficacy of deep learning and VOR model in assessing long-term ecological health, providing a valuable framework that can be applied in other coastal regions facing similar challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 112860"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24013177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coastal regions of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) are crucial links for the “21st Century Maritime Silk Road”. Nonetheless, this region is facing significant ecological challenges due to natural disasters and intensive human activity. To effectively monitor and assess the ecological health of these critical coastal zones, this study employed integrated labels and a deep learning model to obtain land cover data spanning from 2000 to 2023. It then constructed a vigour-organisation-resilience (VOR) model with 12 assessment indicators to evaluate the landscape ecological health of this region. The evaluation results showed distinct spatial patterns. Gwadar and Ormara’s “Bare land” areas remained “Sick,” while Karachi and Lower Indus’ “Impervious surfaces” were “Unhealthy” with minimal fluctuations. The Lower Indus region saw “Sub-healthy” expansion with increased “Crops” areas. Lasbela was “Healthy,” dominated by shrub-based “Other vegetation,” and the Indus Delta’s mangroves maintained a “Very healthy” state. Overall, the CPEC coastal regions were rated “Unhealthy,” with signs of moderate improvement. We recommend that the CPEC coastal areas focus on restoring “Sick” areas, promoting sustainable agriculture in “Sub-healthy” regions, and conserving “Healthy” and “Very healthy” areas. This study demonstrates the efficacy of deep learning and VOR model in assessing long-term ecological health, providing a valuable framework that can be applied in other coastal regions facing similar challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深度学习驱动的土地覆被监测与景观生态健康评估:2000-2023 年中巴经济走廊沿海地区动态研究
中巴经济走廊(CPEC)沿岸地区是 "21 世纪海上丝绸之路 "的关键环节。然而,由于自然灾害和密集的人类活动,该地区正面临着巨大的生态挑战。为了有效监测和评估这些关键沿海地区的生态健康状况,本研究采用了综合标签和深度学习模型来获取 2000 年至 2023 年的土地覆被数据。然后,该研究构建了一个包含 12 个评估指标的活力-组织-复原力(VOR)模型,以评估该区域的景观生态健康状况。评估结果显示了明显的空间模式。瓜达尔和奥尔马拉的 "裸地 "区域仍然 "生病",而卡拉奇和下印度河的 "不透水表面 "则 "不健康",波动很小。下印度河地区的 "农作物 "面积有所增加,处于 "亚健康 "状态。拉斯贝拉 "健康",以灌木为主的 "其他植被",印度河三角洲的红树林保持 "非常健康 "的状态。总体而言,中巴经济走廊沿岸地区被评为 "不健康",但有适度改善的迹象。我们建议 CPEC 沿海地区重点恢复 "有病 "地区,在 "亚健康 "地区推广可持续农业,并保护 "健康 "和 "非常健康 "地区。这项研究证明了深度学习和 VOR 模型在评估长期生态健康方面的功效,提供了一个有价值的框架,可用于面临类似挑战的其他沿海地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
Improving ecosystem respiration estimates for CO2 flux partitioning by discriminating water and temperature controls on above- and below-ground sources Evaluating the performance of spectral indices and meteorological variables as indicators of live fuel moisture content in Mediterranean shrublands Importance of the interplay between land cover and topography in modeling habitat selection Inequity in accessibility to urban parks in environmental gentrification areas based on Multi-G3SFCA: A case study of Wuhan’s main urban districts Comprehensive evaluation and scenario simulation for determining the optimal conservation priority of ecological services in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1