Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting for Carotid Artery Stenosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurologia medico-chirurgica Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0193
Shuki Okuhara, Tomoaki Murakami, Shingo Toyota, Kosei Okochi, Koichi Nakashima, Kazuhiro Tohara, Shuhei Yamada, Takamune Achiha, Maki Kobayashi, Haruhiko Kishima
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting for Carotid Artery Stenosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.","authors":"Shuki Okuhara, Tomoaki Murakami, Shingo Toyota, Kosei Okochi, Koichi Nakashima, Kazuhiro Tohara, Shuhei Yamada, Takamune Achiha, Maki Kobayashi, Haruhiko Kishima","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most previous large studies of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in maintenance hemodialysis patients are old-era, do not describe the types of stents and method of protection, and their effectiveness is unknown. CAS has progressed remarkably, and tailor-made CAS is now possible in hemodialysis patients according to the lesion. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of CAS in maintenance hemodialysis patients treated in our institution.We retrospectively investigated the data of patients who underwent elective CAS in our institution between January 2012 and April 2023. Firstly, we verified the outcomes of CAS in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Secondly, the outcomes of CAS in maintenance hemodialysis patients were compared with CAS in nondialysis patients during the same period.During the study period, 212 patients with carotid stenosis underwent CAS. Among these, 18 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were identified for analysis. All 18 patients underwent lesion-specific tailor-made CAS. All 18 patients were technically successfully stented with good vasodilation and improvement in stenosis. No symptomatic cerebral infarction occurred within 30 days after CAS. There was no difference between dialysis and nondialysis patients in the risk of symptomatic complications and death occurring within 30 days after surgery. There was a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications not associated with prognosis in the dialysis group (23.1% vs 1.0%, P = 0.0047). No in-stent restenosis (>50% stenosis) and ipsilateral cerebral infarction at 1 year occurred during follow-up.CAS in hemodialysis patients may be safe and effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most previous large studies of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in maintenance hemodialysis patients are old-era, do not describe the types of stents and method of protection, and their effectiveness is unknown. CAS has progressed remarkably, and tailor-made CAS is now possible in hemodialysis patients according to the lesion. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of CAS in maintenance hemodialysis patients treated in our institution.We retrospectively investigated the data of patients who underwent elective CAS in our institution between January 2012 and April 2023. Firstly, we verified the outcomes of CAS in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Secondly, the outcomes of CAS in maintenance hemodialysis patients were compared with CAS in nondialysis patients during the same period.During the study period, 212 patients with carotid stenosis underwent CAS. Among these, 18 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were identified for analysis. All 18 patients underwent lesion-specific tailor-made CAS. All 18 patients were technically successfully stented with good vasodilation and improvement in stenosis. No symptomatic cerebral infarction occurred within 30 days after CAS. There was no difference between dialysis and nondialysis patients in the risk of symptomatic complications and death occurring within 30 days after surgery. There was a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications not associated with prognosis in the dialysis group (23.1% vs 1.0%, P = 0.0047). No in-stent restenosis (>50% stenosis) and ipsilateral cerebral infarction at 1 year occurred during follow-up.CAS in hemodialysis patients may be safe and effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈动脉支架植入术治疗维持性血液透析患者颈动脉狭窄的临床效果。
以往对维持性血液透析患者进行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的大型研究大多年代久远,未对支架类型和保护方法进行描述,其效果也不得而知。目前,CAS 已取得显著进展,可根据病变情况为血液透析患者量身定制 CAS。我们回顾性调查了 2012 年 1 月至 2023 年 4 月期间在我院接受选择性 CAS 治疗的患者数据。首先,我们核实了维持性血液透析患者接受 CAS 治疗的结果。在研究期间,212 名颈动脉狭窄患者接受了 CAS。在研究期间,212 名颈动脉狭窄患者接受了 CAS 手术,其中 18 名接受维持性血液透析的患者被确定为分析对象。所有 18 名患者都接受了针对病变部位量身定制的 CAS。所有 18 名患者都成功地进行了技术性支架置入,血管扩张良好,狭窄情况有所改善。CAS 术后 30 天内未发生无症状脑梗塞。透析患者和非透析患者在术后30天内出现症状性并发症和死亡的风险没有差异。透析组发生与预后无关的出血性并发症的风险较高(23.1% vs 1.0%,P = 0.0047)。随访期间没有发生支架内再狭窄(狭窄程度大于50%)和同侧脑梗死。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting for Carotid Artery Stenosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients. Impact of Clazosentan on Vasospasm Reduction and Functional Recovery after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Safety and Selection Criteria of Single-joint Hybrid Assistive Limb for Upper Limb Paralysis After Stroke: A Phase I Trial. Stepwise Improvement of Cerebral Hemodynamics in Staged Angioplasty for Carotid Artery Stenosis. Validity of E-PASS Score for Evaluating Perioperative Minor Complications Associated with Carotid Endarterectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1