Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in the outpatient setting is safe and feasible: a prospective, singe center study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Journal of Impotence Research Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1038/s41443-024-01004-3
Maximilian G Fidel, Jainik Shah, Dhiraj S Bal, Connor Roque, Yool Ko, Harliv Dhillon, Robert Bard, Alagarsamy Pandian, Jasmir G Nayak, Premal Patel
{"title":"Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in the outpatient setting is safe and feasible: a prospective, singe center study.","authors":"Maximilian G Fidel, Jainik Shah, Dhiraj S Bal, Connor Roque, Yool Ko, Harliv Dhillon, Robert Bard, Alagarsamy Pandian, Jasmir G Nayak, Premal Patel","doi":"10.1038/s41443-024-01004-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantations are commonly performed in hospital settings which accommodate an overnight stay and are increasingly being performed as day procedures in outpatient settings with same-day discharge. This study sought to investigate the safety and feasibility of day surgery insertion of an IPP. Surgical parameters and incidence of postoperative complications including infection, hospital admission, emergency room visitation, and additional analgesia were investigated. This prospective study included all adult patients undergoing day surgery insertion of an IPP at an ambulatory surgical center classified as ASA 1-3, between February 2023 and April 2024. All procedures were performed via infrapubic approach under spinal anesthesia or deep sedation with local anesthesia. 52 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 62.5 ± 3.1 [43-79] years. All procedures were performed successfully with no intra-operative complications. The mean surgery duration was 65.2 ± 17.9 [35-130] minutes. The mean recovery time was 115.9 ± 58.2 [50-323] minutes. No patients required hospital admission or had acquired a post-operative infection. One patient required emergency room visitation, which was unrelated to the surgery. 5.9% (n = 3) of patients required additional postoperative analgesia. Our results demonstrate the safety and feasibility of performing an IPP implantation in an outpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":14068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impotence Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impotence Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-01004-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantations are commonly performed in hospital settings which accommodate an overnight stay and are increasingly being performed as day procedures in outpatient settings with same-day discharge. This study sought to investigate the safety and feasibility of day surgery insertion of an IPP. Surgical parameters and incidence of postoperative complications including infection, hospital admission, emergency room visitation, and additional analgesia were investigated. This prospective study included all adult patients undergoing day surgery insertion of an IPP at an ambulatory surgical center classified as ASA 1-3, between February 2023 and April 2024. All procedures were performed via infrapubic approach under spinal anesthesia or deep sedation with local anesthesia. 52 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 62.5 ± 3.1 [43-79] years. All procedures were performed successfully with no intra-operative complications. The mean surgery duration was 65.2 ± 17.9 [35-130] minutes. The mean recovery time was 115.9 ± 58.2 [50-323] minutes. No patients required hospital admission or had acquired a post-operative infection. One patient required emergency room visitation, which was unrelated to the surgery. 5.9% (n = 3) of patients required additional postoperative analgesia. Our results demonstrate the safety and feasibility of performing an IPP implantation in an outpatient setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在门诊环境中植入充气阴茎假体是安全可行的:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
充气阴茎假体(IPP)植入手术通常在医院进行,需要住院一晚,现在越来越多的日间手术在门诊进行,当天即可出院。本研究旨在探讨日间手术植入 IPP 的安全性和可行性。研究调查了手术参数和术后并发症的发生率,包括感染、入院、急诊就诊和额外镇痛。这项前瞻性研究纳入了 2023 年 2 月至 2024 年 4 月期间在 ASA 1-3 级门诊手术中心接受日间手术植入 IPP 的所有成年患者。所有手术均在脊髓麻醉或深度镇静加局部麻醉下通过耻骨下入路进行。52 名患者的平均年龄为 62.5 ± 3.1 [43-79] 岁。所有手术均顺利完成,无术中并发症。平均手术时间为 65.2 ± 17.9 [35-130] 分钟。平均恢复时间为 115.9 ± 58.2 [50-323] 分钟。没有患者需要入院治疗或术后感染。一名患者需要去急诊室就诊,但与手术无关。5.9%的患者(n = 3)需要额外的术后镇痛。我们的研究结果证明了在门诊环境下进行 IPP 植入术的安全性和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Impotence Research
International Journal of Impotence Research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
19.20%
发文量
140
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Impotence Research: The Journal of Sexual Medicine addresses sexual medicine for both genders as an interdisciplinary field. This includes basic science researchers, urologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, radiologists and other health care clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Melatonin and erectile dysfunction: addressing research gaps and proposing future investigations. Sympathetic hypoactivity leads to hypocontractility of the corpus cavernosum in sickle cell mice: a mechanism contributing to priapism. Priapism in the paediatric and adolescent population. Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in the outpatient setting is safe and feasible: a prospective, singe center study. Patients' perceptions of nocturnal erectile function assessment with the RigiScan®.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1