Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management—summary of updated NICE guidance

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2452
Aye Paing, Laura Elliff-O’Shea, Lisa Boardman, David Turner, Linda Glennie
{"title":"Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management—summary of updated NICE guidance","authors":"Aye Paing, Laura Elliff-O’Shea, Lisa Boardman, David Turner, Linda Glennie","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"### What you need to know Bacterial meningitis and meningococcal disease are uncommon but life-threatening conditions. Early recognition is important but difficult because of the non-specific ways in which individuals present. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) initially published guidance on the conditions in 2010 and, after a surveillance review in 2018, updated it following changes in guideline development methodology and to reflect recent developments in vaccination.1 The 2024 guidance also extends the population of the original guideline from children only to including recommendations for adults.1 The term “bacterial meningitis” includes meningococcal meningitis without meningococcal sepsis and meningitis caused by other bacteria, while the term “meningococcal disease” includes meningococcal sepsis with or without meningococcal meningitis. Evidence for the two conditions was reviewed separately but considered in parallel. Whether separate recommendations were needed for each condition was decided based on the evidence and Guideline Committee’s experience. In this article, we summarise selected recommendations related to early recognition of these conditions, timing of investigations, initiating antibiotic therapy, and follow-up. NICE recommendations are based on systematic reviews of best available evidence and explicit consideration of cost effectiveness. When minimal evidence is available, recommendations are based on the Guideline Committee’s experience and opinion of what constitutes good practice. Evidence levels for the recommendations are given in italic in square brackets. ### GRADE Working Group grades of evidence","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

### What you need to know Bacterial meningitis and meningococcal disease are uncommon but life-threatening conditions. Early recognition is important but difficult because of the non-specific ways in which individuals present. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) initially published guidance on the conditions in 2010 and, after a surveillance review in 2018, updated it following changes in guideline development methodology and to reflect recent developments in vaccination.1 The 2024 guidance also extends the population of the original guideline from children only to including recommendations for adults.1 The term “bacterial meningitis” includes meningococcal meningitis without meningococcal sepsis and meningitis caused by other bacteria, while the term “meningococcal disease” includes meningococcal sepsis with or without meningococcal meningitis. Evidence for the two conditions was reviewed separately but considered in parallel. Whether separate recommendations were needed for each condition was decided based on the evidence and Guideline Committee’s experience. In this article, we summarise selected recommendations related to early recognition of these conditions, timing of investigations, initiating antibiotic therapy, and follow-up. NICE recommendations are based on systematic reviews of best available evidence and explicit consideration of cost effectiveness. When minimal evidence is available, recommendations are based on the Guideline Committee’s experience and opinion of what constitutes good practice. Evidence levels for the recommendations are given in italic in square brackets. ### GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑膜炎(细菌性)和脑膜炎球菌病:识别、诊断和管理--NICE 最新指南摘要
### 您需要知道的细菌性脑膜炎和脑膜炎球菌病并不常见,但会危及生命。早期识别非常重要,但却很困难,因为患者的发病方式没有特异性。美国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)最初于 2010 年发布了关于这两种疾病的指南,并在 2018 年进行监测审查后,根据指南制定方法的变化进行了更新,以反映疫苗接种方面的最新进展。1 术语 "细菌性脑膜炎 "包括不伴有脑膜炎球菌败血症的脑膜炎球菌性脑膜炎和由其他细菌引起的脑膜炎,而术语 "脑膜炎球菌病 "包括伴有或不伴有脑膜炎球菌性脑膜炎的脑膜炎球菌败血症。对这两种疾病的证据进行了单独审查,但同时进行了审议。根据证据和指南委员会的经验,决定是否需要针对每种情况分别提出建议。在本文中,我们总结了与这些疾病的早期识别、检查时机、开始抗生素治疗和随访相关的部分建议。NICE 的建议基于对现有最佳证据的系统性回顾,并明确考虑了成本效益。在证据极少的情况下,则根据指南委员会的经验和对良好实践的看法提出建议。建议的证据等级以斜体显示在方括号内。### GRADE 工作组的证据等级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creating smoke-free spaces: who is affected by legislation? What is “man flu”? Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management—summary of updated NICE guidance David Oliver: The current stand-off may leave physician associates stranded Mark Ashworth: “cycling” GP and researcher who recognised the power of big data to transform healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1