Context-dependency of the REM sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire - Clinical utility under scrutiny

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Parkinsonism & related disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107211
Sinah Röttgen , Christopher E.J. Doppler , Aline Seger , Elke Kalbe , Gereon R. Fink , Michael Sommerauer , Anja Ophey
{"title":"Context-dependency of the REM sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire - Clinical utility under scrutiny","authors":"Sinah Röttgen ,&nbsp;Christopher E.J. Doppler ,&nbsp;Aline Seger ,&nbsp;Elke Kalbe ,&nbsp;Gereon R. Fink ,&nbsp;Michael Sommerauer ,&nbsp;Anja Ophey","doi":"10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD) Screening Questionnaire (RBDSQ) is a widely established screening tool for detecting isolated RBD (iRBD). However, its accuracy may depend on its application context, e.g., the individuals’ awareness of their RBD status. The present work aims to describe the context-dependency and retest reliability of the RBDSQ in an iRBD cohort setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ninety-four individuals with video-polysomnography confirmed iRBD answered the RBDSQ during pre-polysomnography screening (V0) and post-diagnosis (V1).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The RBDSQ total score significantly differed between V0 and V1 (<em>F</em>(1,92) = 8.02, <em>p</em> = .006, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.019). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>2,1</sub>) of the RBDSQ showed moderate reliability between consecutive timepoints (<sup>V0-V1</sup>ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.544). The highest Cohen's κ was reached for items 5, 6.3, 6.4, 8, and 9 across timepoint comparisons (0.409 ≤ Cohen's κ ≤ 0.660).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings underscore the context-dependency of the RBDSQ and fluctuations in self-awareness of sleep-related behaviors, necessitating a critical appraisal of questionnaire-based RBD screening tools. Future studies should explore strategies to improve the reliability and accuracy of RBD screening tools, considering the dynamic nature of sleep-related behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19970,"journal":{"name":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 107211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353802024012239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD) Screening Questionnaire (RBDSQ) is a widely established screening tool for detecting isolated RBD (iRBD). However, its accuracy may depend on its application context, e.g., the individuals’ awareness of their RBD status. The present work aims to describe the context-dependency and retest reliability of the RBDSQ in an iRBD cohort setting.

Methods

Ninety-four individuals with video-polysomnography confirmed iRBD answered the RBDSQ during pre-polysomnography screening (V0) and post-diagnosis (V1).

Results

The RBDSQ total score significantly differed between V0 and V1 (F(1,92) = 8.02, p = .006, ηp2 = 0.019). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) of the RBDSQ showed moderate reliability between consecutive timepoints (V0-V1ICC2,1 = 0.544). The highest Cohen's κ was reached for items 5, 6.3, 6.4, 8, and 9 across timepoint comparisons (0.409 ≤ Cohen's κ ≤ 0.660).

Conclusion

Our findings underscore the context-dependency of the RBDSQ and fluctuations in self-awareness of sleep-related behaviors, necessitating a critical appraisal of questionnaire-based RBD screening tools. Future studies should explore strategies to improve the reliability and accuracy of RBD screening tools, considering the dynamic nature of sleep-related behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速眼动睡眠行为障碍筛查问卷的情境依赖性--临床实用性受到质疑
导言快速眼动睡眠行为障碍(RBD)筛查问卷(RBDSQ)是一种广泛使用的筛查工具,用于检测孤立性 RBD(iRBD)。然而,它的准确性可能取决于其应用情境,例如个人对其 RBD 状态的认知。本研究旨在描述 RBDSQ 在 iRBD 队列环境中的情境依赖性和重测可靠性。方法94 名经视频多导睡眠图确诊为 iRBD 的患者在多导睡眠图筛查前(V0)和诊断后(V1)回答了 RBDSQ。RBDSQ 的类内相关系数 (ICC2,1) 显示,连续时间点之间的可靠性适中(V0-V1ICC2,1 = 0.544)。结论我们的研究结果强调了 RBDSQ 的情境依赖性和睡眠相关行为自我意识的波动性,因此有必要对基于问卷的 RBD 筛查工具进行批判性评估。考虑到睡眠相关行为的动态性,未来的研究应探索提高RBD筛查工具可靠性和准确性的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parkinsonism & related disorders
Parkinsonism & related disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
292
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders publishes the results of basic and clinical research contributing to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of all neurodegenerative syndromes in which Parkinsonism, Essential Tremor or related movement disorders may be a feature. Regular features will include: Review Articles, Point of View articles, Full-length Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports and Letter to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
A multidisciplinary telemedicine approach for managing frailty in Parkinson's disease. A longitudinal, case-control study Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease: Lessons from two new Indian kindreds TMS-evoked potentials provide novel neurophysiological features of Tourette syndrome Exposure factors and clinical characteristics associated with Parkinson's disease in GBA1 variant carriers: A Chinese GBA1-PD intrafamilial survey Unsupervised definition of two clinical subtypes of Essential tremor and the underlying brain topology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1