Systematic screening for active tuberculosis amongst refugees and asylum seekers in Western Europe: Is universal chest radiography justified? A literature review

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2024.11.011
N. Dooley , P. Lockwood
{"title":"Systematic screening for active tuberculosis amongst refugees and asylum seekers in Western Europe: Is universal chest radiography justified? A literature review","authors":"N. Dooley ,&nbsp;P. Lockwood","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Tuberculosis (TB) prevalence is considered high amongst refugees and asylum seekers (RAAS). Active TB screening using universal (indiscriminate) chest radiography (CXR) has been adopted in several European countries. Universal CXR screening raises concerns for radiation protection; no existing research reviews the literature from a radiography perspective. This review aims to identify and analyse relevant primary research to discuss the justification of universal CXR for RAAS in an active TB screening context.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The search strategy included the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and ScienceDirect and used predefined Boolean search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria. A critical appraisal evaluated the quality of papers included in the review, and a synthesis-analysis method was used to find common themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight papers were included in the review. The thematic analysis identified three themes for discussion: the 2014/15 crisis, the complexity of defining TB risk amongst RAAS, and the value of CXR-led versus symptom-led screening for RAAS. Findings support continued systematic screening for TB amongst RAAS but with re-evaluation of CXR eligibility or the screening algorithm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The heterogeneity of TB risk amongst RAAS indicates that CXR-led screening should be targeted at specific high-risk groups rather than universally applied.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Justification of CXR screening for RAAS is context-specific and should be informed by TB risk amongst the target population. The advantages of CXR-led screening over other screening algorithms (e.g. symptom-led) justify its use for TB screening in most settings. Considerations identified in this literature review could help inform the development of local protocols for justifying CXR for TB screening amongst RAAS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 194-200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424003420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) prevalence is considered high amongst refugees and asylum seekers (RAAS). Active TB screening using universal (indiscriminate) chest radiography (CXR) has been adopted in several European countries. Universal CXR screening raises concerns for radiation protection; no existing research reviews the literature from a radiography perspective. This review aims to identify and analyse relevant primary research to discuss the justification of universal CXR for RAAS in an active TB screening context.

Methods

The search strategy included the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and ScienceDirect and used predefined Boolean search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria. A critical appraisal evaluated the quality of papers included in the review, and a synthesis-analysis method was used to find common themes.

Results

Eight papers were included in the review. The thematic analysis identified three themes for discussion: the 2014/15 crisis, the complexity of defining TB risk amongst RAAS, and the value of CXR-led versus symptom-led screening for RAAS. Findings support continued systematic screening for TB amongst RAAS but with re-evaluation of CXR eligibility or the screening algorithm.

Conclusions

The heterogeneity of TB risk amongst RAAS indicates that CXR-led screening should be targeted at specific high-risk groups rather than universally applied.

Implications for practice

Justification of CXR screening for RAAS is context-specific and should be informed by TB risk amongst the target population. The advantages of CXR-led screening over other screening algorithms (e.g. symptom-led) justify its use for TB screening in most settings. Considerations identified in this literature review could help inform the development of local protocols for justifying CXR for TB screening amongst RAAS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在西欧难民和寻求庇护者中系统筛查活动性肺结核:是否有理由进行普遍的胸部放射检查?文献综述
导言:在难民和寻求庇护者(RAAS)中,结核病(TB)的发病率被认为很高。一些欧洲国家已采用普遍(无差别)胸片(CXR)对肺结核进行主动筛查。普遍的 CXR 筛查引起了人们对辐射防护的关注;目前还没有研究从放射学的角度对相关文献进行回顾。本综述旨在确定和分析相关的初步研究,以讨论在结核病主动筛查中针对 RAAS 普及 CXR 的合理性。方法:检索策略包括 CINAHL、MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 ScienceDirect 等数据库,并使用预定义的布尔检索词和纳入/排除标准。批判性评价对纳入综述的论文进行了质量评估,并采用综合分析方法寻找共同的主题。专题分析确定了三个讨论主题:2014/15 年度危机、界定 RAAS 中结核病风险的复杂性,以及针对 RAAS 的 CXR 主导型筛查与症状主导型筛查的价值。结论 RAAS 中结核病风险的异质性表明,以 CXR 为主导的筛查应针对特定的高风险人群,而不是普遍应用。对实践的启示对 RAAS 进行 CXR 筛查的理由要视具体情况而定,并应根据目标人群的结核病风险而定。与其他筛查算法(如症状引导)相比,CXR 引导筛查的优势使其有理由在大多数情况下用于结核病筛查。本文献综述中确定的考虑因素有助于为制定当地方案提供参考,以证明在 RAAS 中进行 CXR 肺结核筛查是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
Radiographer chest x-ray reporting in Scotland in 2023: An exploratory study into the attitudes and challenges concerning the development of a standardised, countrywide reporting service Becoming the radiation therapist: Exploring the transition to practice experiences of Australian radiation therapist graduates The perceptions and experiences of final year undergraduate diagnostic imaging students when facilitating peer-assisted learning within the simulated learning environment Systematic screening for active tuberculosis amongst refugees and asylum seekers in Western Europe: Is universal chest radiography justified? A literature review The scope of practice for diagnostic radiographers in Singapore: A preliminary survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1