Far-Ultraviolet C Disinfection Reduces Oxidative Damage to the Cornea Compared to Povidone-Iodine Disinfection.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Antioxidants Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3390/antiox13111344
Tu-Wen Chen, Rong-Kung Tsai, Cheng-En Zou, Chin-Te Huang, Maisam Ali, Tzu-Chao Hsu, Keh-Liang Lin, Yao-Tseng Wen
{"title":"Far-Ultraviolet C Disinfection Reduces Oxidative Damage to the Cornea Compared to Povidone-Iodine Disinfection.","authors":"Tu-Wen Chen, Rong-Kung Tsai, Cheng-En Zou, Chin-Te Huang, Maisam Ali, Tzu-Chao Hsu, Keh-Liang Lin, Yao-Tseng Wen","doi":"10.3390/antiox13111344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Far-ultraviolet C (far-UVC) light shows promise for pathogen control but its safety and efficacy for corneal disinfection remain unclear. In this study, safe far-UVC dosages were investigated for corneal disinfection and its germicidal performance and oxidative damage potential to 5% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) were compared. Rat corneas were exposed to varying 222 nm far-UVC doses (3-60 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>) and assessed for ocular damage, apoptosis, and oxidative stress to determine the safe dose of far-UVC. Far-UVC at 30 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> induced corneal apoptosis and oxidative damage, but 15 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> caused no apoptosis or oxidative damage. At this optimized dose (9 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>), far-UVC achieved 90.5% sterilization, exceeding 5% PVP-I (80.8%), with significantly less oxidative damage and cell death in the cornea. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the use of 5% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) for disinfection results in significant oxidative damage to the corneal tissue. However, a safe dosage of far-UVC light exhibited a promising disinfection effect without causing oxidative damage to the corneal tissue. Far-UVC offers a promising alternative for corneal disinfection but requires careful dosage control (≤30 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>) to avoid ocular surface harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":7984,"journal":{"name":"Antioxidants","volume":"13 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11591454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antioxidants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13111344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Far-ultraviolet C (far-UVC) light shows promise for pathogen control but its safety and efficacy for corneal disinfection remain unclear. In this study, safe far-UVC dosages were investigated for corneal disinfection and its germicidal performance and oxidative damage potential to 5% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) were compared. Rat corneas were exposed to varying 222 nm far-UVC doses (3-60 mJ/cm2) and assessed for ocular damage, apoptosis, and oxidative stress to determine the safe dose of far-UVC. Far-UVC at 30 mJ/cm2 induced corneal apoptosis and oxidative damage, but 15 mJ/cm2 caused no apoptosis or oxidative damage. At this optimized dose (9 mJ/cm2), far-UVC achieved 90.5% sterilization, exceeding 5% PVP-I (80.8%), with significantly less oxidative damage and cell death in the cornea. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the use of 5% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) for disinfection results in significant oxidative damage to the corneal tissue. However, a safe dosage of far-UVC light exhibited a promising disinfection effect without causing oxidative damage to the corneal tissue. Far-UVC offers a promising alternative for corneal disinfection but requires careful dosage control (≤30 mJ/cm2) to avoid ocular surface harm.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与聚维酮碘消毒相比,远紫外线 C 消毒可减少角膜的氧化损伤。
远紫外线 C(far-UVC)有望控制病原体,但其用于角膜消毒的安全性和有效性仍不明确。本研究调查了远紫外线用于角膜消毒的安全剂量,并比较了远紫外线与 5%聚维酮碘 (PVP-I) 的杀菌性能和氧化损伤潜力。将大鼠角膜暴露在不同的 222 纳米远紫外线剂量(3-60 mJ/cm2)下,并对眼损伤、细胞凋亡和氧化应激进行评估,以确定远紫外线的安全剂量。30 mJ/cm2 的远紫外线可诱导角膜凋亡和氧化损伤,但 15 mJ/cm2 不会导致角膜凋亡或氧化损伤。在这一优化剂量(9 mJ/cm2)下,远紫外线的杀菌率达到 90.5%,超过了 5%的 PVP-I(80.8%),角膜的氧化损伤和细胞死亡明显减少。总之,我们的研究表明,使用 5%聚维酮碘 (PVP-I) 消毒会对角膜组织造成严重的氧化损伤。然而,安全剂量的远紫外光具有良好的消毒效果,不会对角膜组织造成氧化损伤。远紫外线为角膜消毒提供了一种有前途的替代方法,但需要谨慎控制剂量(≤30 mJ/cm2),以避免对眼表造成伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antioxidants
Antioxidants Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Physiology
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
2123
审稿时长
16.3 days
期刊介绍: Antioxidants (ISSN 2076-3921), provides an advanced forum for studies related to the science and technology of antioxidants. It publishes research papers, reviews and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
期刊最新文献
3,6′-Disinapoyl Sucrose from Polygalae Radix Exerts Anti-Aging Effects via Modification of Telomeres, SIRT1/p53/p21 Pathway, Oxidative Stress and Autophagy Integrative Pharmacokinetic and Metabolomic Analyses Reveal the Underlying Mechanisms of Metabolic Regulation and Support the Safe Use of Oxolinic Acid in Micropterus salmoides Phenolic Characterization and Comparative Antioxidant Profiling of Australian Asparagopsis armata and A. taxiformis Across Their Developmental Stages. Astragaloside IV Alleviates Trueperella pyogenes-Induced Endometritis via the Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling Pathway. Exploring the Beneficial Effects of Se-Methylselenocysteine on GC-1/GC-2 Cells: From Cellular Uptake to Metabolic Pathway Regulation in Male Reproduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1