Prospective Validation and Usability Evaluation of a Mobile Diagnostic App for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14222519
Pedro Amorim, Daniela Ferreira-Santos, Marta Drummond, Pedro Pereira Rodrigues
{"title":"Prospective Validation and Usability Evaluation of a Mobile Diagnostic App for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.","authors":"Pedro Amorim, Daniela Ferreira-Santos, Marta Drummond, Pedro Pereira Rodrigues","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics14222519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) classification relies on polysomnography (PSG) results. Current guidelines recommend the development of clinical prediction algorithms in screening prior to PSG. A recent intuitive and user-friendly tool (OSABayes), based on a Bayesian network model using six clinical variables, has been proposed to quantify the probability of OSA. Our aims are (1) to validate OSABayes prospectively, (2) to build a smartphone app based on the proposed model, and (3) to evaluate app usability. <b>Methods</b>: We prospectively included adult patients suspected of OSA, without suspicion of other sleep disorders, who underwent level I or III diagnostic PSG. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and OSABayes probabilities were obtained and compared using the area under the ROC curve (AUC [95%CI]) for OSA diagnosis (AHI ≥ 5/h) and higher severity levels (AHI ≥ 15/h) prediction. We built the OSABayes app on 'App Inventor 2', and the usability was assessed with a cognitive walkthrough method and a general evaluation. <b>Results</b>: 216 subjects were included in the validation cohort, performing PSG levels I (34%) and III (66%). OSABayes presented an AUC of 83.6% [77.3-90.0%] for OSA diagnosis and 76.3% [69.9-82.7%] for moderate/severe OSA prediction, showing good response for both types of PSG. The OSABayes smartphone application allows one to calculate the probability of having OSA and consult information about OSA and the tool. In the usability evaluation, 96% of the proposed tasks were carried out. <b>Conclusions</b>: These results show the good discrimination power of OSABayes and validate its applicability in identifying patients with a high pre-test probability of OSA. The tool is available as an online form and as a smartphone app, allowing a quick and accessible calculation of OSA probability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"14 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) classification relies on polysomnography (PSG) results. Current guidelines recommend the development of clinical prediction algorithms in screening prior to PSG. A recent intuitive and user-friendly tool (OSABayes), based on a Bayesian network model using six clinical variables, has been proposed to quantify the probability of OSA. Our aims are (1) to validate OSABayes prospectively, (2) to build a smartphone app based on the proposed model, and (3) to evaluate app usability. Methods: We prospectively included adult patients suspected of OSA, without suspicion of other sleep disorders, who underwent level I or III diagnostic PSG. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and OSABayes probabilities were obtained and compared using the area under the ROC curve (AUC [95%CI]) for OSA diagnosis (AHI ≥ 5/h) and higher severity levels (AHI ≥ 15/h) prediction. We built the OSABayes app on 'App Inventor 2', and the usability was assessed with a cognitive walkthrough method and a general evaluation. Results: 216 subjects were included in the validation cohort, performing PSG levels I (34%) and III (66%). OSABayes presented an AUC of 83.6% [77.3-90.0%] for OSA diagnosis and 76.3% [69.9-82.7%] for moderate/severe OSA prediction, showing good response for both types of PSG. The OSABayes smartphone application allows one to calculate the probability of having OSA and consult information about OSA and the tool. In the usability evaluation, 96% of the proposed tasks were carried out. Conclusions: These results show the good discrimination power of OSABayes and validate its applicability in identifying patients with a high pre-test probability of OSA. The tool is available as an online form and as a smartphone app, allowing a quick and accessible calculation of OSA probability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停移动诊断应用程序的前瞻性验证和可用性评估。
背景/目的:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)分类依赖于多导睡眠图(PSG)结果。现行指南建议在 PSG 之前开发筛查临床预测算法。最近有人提出了一种直观且用户友好的工具(OSABayes),该工具基于使用六个临床变量的贝叶斯网络模型,用于量化 OSA 的概率。我们的目标是:(1)对 OSABayes 进行前瞻性验证;(2)基于所提出的模型开发一款智能手机应用程序;(3)评估应用程序的可用性。方法:我们前瞻性地纳入了疑似 OSA 的成年患者,这些患者未怀疑有其他睡眠障碍,并接受了 I 级或 III 级 PSG 诊断。我们获得了呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI)和 OSABayes 概率,并使用 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC [95%CI])对 OSA 诊断(AHI ≥ 5/h)和更高严重程度(AHI ≥ 15/h)预测进行了比较。我们在 "App Inventor 2 "上开发了 OSABayes 应用程序,并通过认知演练法和一般评估对其可用性进行了评估。结果:216 名受试者参加了验证队列,他们的 PSG 水平分别为 I 级(34%)和 III 级(66%)。OSABayes 对 OSA 诊断的 AUC 为 83.6% [77.3-90.0%],对中度/重度 OSA 预测的 AUC 为 76.3% [69.9-82.7%],显示出对两种 PSG 的良好反应。OSABayes智能手机应用程序允许人们计算患OSA的概率,并查询有关OSA和该工具的信息。在可用性评估中,96% 的建议任务都得到了执行。结论这些结果表明 OSABayes 具有良好的辨别能力,并验证了其在识别 OSA 检测前概率较高的患者方面的适用性。该工具可作为在线表格和智能手机应用程序使用,可快速方便地计算 OSA 概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED: Monda et al. Left Ventricular Non-Compaction in Children: Aetiology and Diagnostic Criteria. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 115. Compound Heterozygous Variants in the IFT140 Gene Associated with Skeletal Ciliopathies. A Novel Method for 3D Lung Tumor Reconstruction Using Generative Models. Agreement Between Resting Energy Expenditure Predictive Formulas and Indirect Calorimetry in Non-Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease. Multi-Scale 3D Cephalometric Landmark Detection Based on Direct Regression with 3D CNN Architectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1