Barriers and facilitators to using procedural pain treatments in pediatric patients (under 1 year old): protocol for a mixed studies systematic review with a narrative synthesis.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02713-y
Chunji Yan, Jiale Hu, Jiamin Kang, Xueyan Xing, Shumin Tu, Fang Zhou
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to using procedural pain treatments in pediatric patients (under 1 year old): protocol for a mixed studies systematic review with a narrative synthesis.","authors":"Chunji Yan, Jiale Hu, Jiamin Kang, Xueyan Xing, Shumin Tu, Fang Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02713-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of procedural pain in pediatric patients under 1 year old is crucial but often inadequately addressed in clinical practice. Despite proven evidence-based interventions like skin-to-skin contact, sweet solutions, and breastfeeding, their implementation remains sporadic. This systematic review aims to uncover the barriers and facilitators to adopting these interventions, leveraging the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to provide a structured analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will examine primary studies identifying barriers or facilitators to the use of procedural pain treatments in pediatric patients under 1 year old, imposing no restrictions on the publication year or language. A thorough search will cover databases such as MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) will be utilized for quality assessment. The CFIR framework will serve to categorize and analyze the identified barriers and facilitators, using narrative synthesis for data integration.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Applying the CFIR framework allows for a comprehensive and systematic review of the factors influencing the implementation of procedural pain management strategies in pediatric care. By identifying key barriers and facilitators through this lens, the review will guide the development of targeted interventions aimed at enhancing the adoption of evidence-based pain treatments. Such strategic interventions are essential for bridging the gap between research findings and clinical practice, potentially improving the effectiveness and efficiency of pain management for pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022322319.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"287"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02713-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of procedural pain in pediatric patients under 1 year old is crucial but often inadequately addressed in clinical practice. Despite proven evidence-based interventions like skin-to-skin contact, sweet solutions, and breastfeeding, their implementation remains sporadic. This systematic review aims to uncover the barriers and facilitators to adopting these interventions, leveraging the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to provide a structured analysis.

Methods: This review will examine primary studies identifying barriers or facilitators to the use of procedural pain treatments in pediatric patients under 1 year old, imposing no restrictions on the publication year or language. A thorough search will cover databases such as MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) will be utilized for quality assessment. The CFIR framework will serve to categorize and analyze the identified barriers and facilitators, using narrative synthesis for data integration.

Discussion: Applying the CFIR framework allows for a comprehensive and systematic review of the factors influencing the implementation of procedural pain management strategies in pediatric care. By identifying key barriers and facilitators through this lens, the review will guide the development of targeted interventions aimed at enhancing the adoption of evidence-based pain treatments. Such strategic interventions are essential for bridging the gap between research findings and clinical practice, potentially improving the effectiveness and efficiency of pain management for pediatric patients.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022322319.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对儿科患者(1 岁以下)使用程序性疼痛治疗方法的障碍和促进因素:混合研究系统综述方案。
背景:1 岁以下儿科患者的手术疼痛管理至关重要,但在临床实践中往往处理不足。尽管有经证实的循证干预措施,如皮肤接触、甜味溶液和母乳喂养,但这些措施的实施仍很零散。本系统性综述旨在利用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)进行结构化分析,揭示采用这些干预措施的障碍和促进因素:方法:本综述将对确定在 1 岁以下儿科患者中使用程序性疼痛治疗方法的障碍或促进因素的主要研究进行审查,对发表年份或语言不做限制。全面检索将涵盖 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Web of Science 和 Scopus 等数据库。质量评估将使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)。CFIR框架将用于对已确定的障碍和促进因素进行分类和分析,并使用叙事综合法进行数据整合:讨论:应用 CFIR 框架可对儿科护理中实施程序性疼痛管理策略的影响因素进行全面、系统的审查。通过这一视角识别关键的障碍和促进因素,该综述将指导制定有针对性的干预措施,以促进循证疼痛治疗的采用。此类战略性干预措施对于弥合研究成果与临床实践之间的差距至关重要,有可能提高儿科患者疼痛管理的有效性和效率:系统综述注册:PROCERGO CRD42022322319。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
End-of-life care for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a scoping review protocol. Routine use of patient-reported experience and outcome measures for children and young people: a scoping review. Breast thermography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilars compared with the biologic etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Large language models, updates, and evaluation of automation tools for systematic reviews: a summary of significant discussions at the eighth meeting of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1