Analysis of Gender Issues in Computational Thinking Approach in Science and Mathematics Learning in Higher Education.

Alejandro De la Hoz Serrano, Lina Viviana Melo Niño, Andrés Álvarez Murillo, Miguel Ángel Martín Tardío, Florentina Cañada Cañada, Javier Cubero Juánez
{"title":"Analysis of Gender Issues in Computational Thinking Approach in Science and Mathematics Learning in Higher Education.","authors":"Alejandro De la Hoz Serrano, Lina Viviana Melo Niño, Andrés Álvarez Murillo, Miguel Ángel Martín Tardío, Florentina Cañada Cañada, Javier Cubero Juánez","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe14110188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the contemporary era, Computational Thinking has emerged as a crucial skill for individuals to possess in order to thrive in the 21st century. In this context, there is a need to develop a methodology for cultivating these skills within a science and mathematics content education framework, particularly among pre-service teachers. This study aimed to investigate the impact of Educational Robotics on the development of Computational Thinking skills, with a particular focus on the role of gender, through a scientific and mathematical content teaching approach. A pre-experimental design with a quantitative approach was employed, and it was implemented with a total of 116 pre-service teachers, 38 males and 78 females. The results demonstrated a notable enhancement between the pre-test (8.11) and post-test (9.63) scores, emphasising specific concepts such as simple functions, while, and compound conditional. With respect to gender, statistically significant differences were identified prior to the intervention, but not following its implementation. The high level of Computational Thinking exhibited by both genders was comparable (53.85% in females and 55.26% in males) following the intervention. This indicates that the intervention is a promising approach for enhancing Computational Thinking proficiency, independent of gender and initial proficiency levels. The implementation of Educational Robotics in the teaching of science and mathematics enables the enhancement of Computational Thinking abilities among pre-service teachers, while reducing the observed gender disparity in this area of skill development.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"14 11","pages":"2865-2882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14110188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the contemporary era, Computational Thinking has emerged as a crucial skill for individuals to possess in order to thrive in the 21st century. In this context, there is a need to develop a methodology for cultivating these skills within a science and mathematics content education framework, particularly among pre-service teachers. This study aimed to investigate the impact of Educational Robotics on the development of Computational Thinking skills, with a particular focus on the role of gender, through a scientific and mathematical content teaching approach. A pre-experimental design with a quantitative approach was employed, and it was implemented with a total of 116 pre-service teachers, 38 males and 78 females. The results demonstrated a notable enhancement between the pre-test (8.11) and post-test (9.63) scores, emphasising specific concepts such as simple functions, while, and compound conditional. With respect to gender, statistically significant differences were identified prior to the intervention, but not following its implementation. The high level of Computational Thinking exhibited by both genders was comparable (53.85% in females and 55.26% in males) following the intervention. This indicates that the intervention is a promising approach for enhancing Computational Thinking proficiency, independent of gender and initial proficiency levels. The implementation of Educational Robotics in the teaching of science and mathematics enables the enhancement of Computational Thinking abilities among pre-service teachers, while reducing the observed gender disparity in this area of skill development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育科学和数学学习中计算思维方法的性别问题分析。
在当代,计算思维已成为个人在 21 世纪茁壮成长所必须掌握的一项重要技能。在这种情况下,有必要制定一种方法,在科学和数学内容教育框架内培养这些技能,特别是在职前教师中。本研究旨在通过科学和数学内容教学方法,调查教育机器人对计算思维能力发展的影响,尤其关注性别的作用。研究采用了定量的预实验设计,共有 116 名职前教师参加了实验,其中男性 38 人,女性 78 人。结果表明,前测成绩(8.11)和后测成绩(9.63)之间有显著提高,强调了简单函数、同时和复合条件等具体概念。在性别方面,干预前有显著的统计差异,但干预后则没有。干预后,男女生的计算思维水平相当(女生为 53.85%,男生为 55.26%)。这表明,干预是提高计算思维能力的有效方法,与性别和初始能力水平无关。在科学和数学教学中实施教育机器人技术,能够提高职前教师的计算思维能力,同时减少在这一技能发展领域观察到的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Examining the Factor Structure and Validity of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21. Addressing the Sense of School Belonging Among All Students? A Systematic Literature Review. Bivalent Fears of Evaluation in Social Anxiety: Evaluation of an Extended Psychoevolutionary Model. Parental Burnout-A Model of Risk Factors and Protective Resources Among Mothers of Children with/Without Special Needs. Analysis of Gender Issues in Computational Thinking Approach in Science and Mathematics Learning in Higher Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1