Beacons not burdens: Business groups and corporate social performance around the world

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Global Strategy Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1002/gsj.1515
Sorin M. S. Krammer, Vlad-Andrei Porumb, Yasemin Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu, Joel Bothello
{"title":"Beacons not burdens: Business groups and corporate social performance around the world","authors":"Sorin M. S. Krammer,&nbsp;Vlad-Andrei Porumb,&nbsp;Yasemin Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu,&nbsp;Joel Bothello","doi":"10.1002/gsj.1515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Prior studies on business groups (BGs) have predominantly focused on the impact of group affiliation on financial performance. In contrast, we argue that BG affiliates will outperform standalone firms in terms of corporate social performance (CSP) and that this effect will be positively moderated by the strength of formal and informal institutions. Moreover, we examine also differences among BGs and hypothesize that diversification and hierarchy of the group will negatively affect the CSP of affiliates. Employing a panel of 4368 firms from 43 countries between 2003 and 2016 and a propensity score matching approach in our regressions, we find robust support for these predictions. Our findings advance two distinct strands of literature on BGs and, respectively, corporate social responsibility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Managerial Summary</h3>\n \n <p>BG are a common organizational structure in many countries. Despite this, we still do not know much about them beyond their financial performance. In this study, we focus on examining the impact of BG affiliation on non-financial performance (i.e., CSP) in the light of growing societal grand challenges. Using an international dataset of several thousands of firms, we find out that BG affiliates exhibit superior CSP results compared to non-affiliated firms. These positive effects of affiliation are increased in environments with strong formal and informal institutions but reduced within groups that are more diversified and hierarchical. Our findings showcase the importance of BGs in tackling some of today's grand challenges and provide support for more nuanced approaches to study BGs across countries.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47563,"journal":{"name":"Global Strategy Journal","volume":"14 4","pages":"709-753"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gsj.1515","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Strategy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gsj.1515","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research Summary

Prior studies on business groups (BGs) have predominantly focused on the impact of group affiliation on financial performance. In contrast, we argue that BG affiliates will outperform standalone firms in terms of corporate social performance (CSP) and that this effect will be positively moderated by the strength of formal and informal institutions. Moreover, we examine also differences among BGs and hypothesize that diversification and hierarchy of the group will negatively affect the CSP of affiliates. Employing a panel of 4368 firms from 43 countries between 2003 and 2016 and a propensity score matching approach in our regressions, we find robust support for these predictions. Our findings advance two distinct strands of literature on BGs and, respectively, corporate social responsibility.

Managerial Summary

BG are a common organizational structure in many countries. Despite this, we still do not know much about them beyond their financial performance. In this study, we focus on examining the impact of BG affiliation on non-financial performance (i.e., CSP) in the light of growing societal grand challenges. Using an international dataset of several thousands of firms, we find out that BG affiliates exhibit superior CSP results compared to non-affiliated firms. These positive effects of affiliation are increased in environments with strong formal and informal institutions but reduced within groups that are more diversified and hierarchical. Our findings showcase the importance of BGs in tackling some of today's grand challenges and provide support for more nuanced approaches to study BGs across countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灯塔而非负担:世界各地的企业集团和企业社会绩效
研究摘要 以往关于企业集团(BGs)的研究主要集中于集团关联对财务业绩的影响。相比之下,我们认为企业集团关联公司在企业社会绩效(CSP)方面会优于独立公司,而且这种影响会受到正式和非正式机构实力的积极调节。此外,我们还研究了企业集团之间的差异,并假设集团的多元化和等级制度将对关联公司的 CSP 产生负面影响。通过对 2003 年至 2016 年间来自 43 个国家的 4368 家企业进行面板分析,并在回归中采用倾向得分匹配法,我们发现这些预测得到了有力的支持。我们的研究结果分别推进了有关企业集团和企业社会责任的两股不同的文献。 经理人摘要 BG 是许多国家常见的组织结构。尽管如此,除了它们的财务表现之外,我们对它们的了解仍然不多。在本研究中,我们重点考察了企业集团隶属关系在日益严峻的社会挑战下对非财务绩效(即企业社会责任)的影响。通过使用一个包含数千家企业的国际数据集,我们发现,与非隶属企业相比,隶属于企业集团的企业表现出更优越的 CSP 结果。在拥有强大的正式和非正式机构的环境中,隶属关系的这些积极效应会增强,但在更加多元化和等级化的群体中,隶属关系的这些积极效应会减弱。我们的研究结果展示了企业集团在应对当今一些重大挑战方面的重要性,并为采用更细致的方法研究各国的企业集团提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Global Strategy Journal is a premier platform dedicated to publishing highly influential managerially-oriented global strategy research worldwide. Covering themes such as international and global strategy, assembling the global enterprise, and strategic management, GSJ plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of global business dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC Beacons not burdens: Business groups and corporate social performance around the world Theorizing about emerging multinationals' cross-border acquisitions Does prior success influence risk-taking in foreign location decisions? A prospect theory perspective Issue Information - TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1