Reproducibility and Validity of Plant-Based Dietary Indices in the Cancer Prevention Study-3 Diet Assessment Sub-Study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.11.017
Benjamin A Cousineau, Ellen L Mitchell, Rebecca A Hodge, Viola Vaccarino, Jessica A Alvarez, W Dana Flanders, Aryeh D Stein, Diane C Mitchell, Marjorie L McCullough, Terryl J Hartman
{"title":"Reproducibility and Validity of Plant-Based Dietary Indices in the Cancer Prevention Study-3 Diet Assessment Sub-Study.","authors":"Benjamin A Cousineau, Ellen L Mitchell, Rebecca A Hodge, Viola Vaccarino, Jessica A Alvarez, W Dana Flanders, Aryeh D Stein, Diane C Mitchell, Marjorie L McCullough, Terryl J Hartman","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.11.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Overall Plant-based Diet Index (PDI), the Healthful Plant-based Diet Index (hPDI), and the Unhealthful Plant-based Diet Index (uPDI) are relatively new tools for characterizing the quality of plant-based dietary patterns in epidemiological studies. Reproducibility and validity of these indices have not been assessed across populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and validity of PDI, hPDI and uPDI in a racially and ethnically diverse population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n=433 women, n=244 men, n=417 non-Hispanic White, n=159 non-Hispanic Black, n=101 Hispanic) from the 2015-2016 Cancer Prevention Study 3 Dietary Assessment Sub-Study (CPS-3 DAS) completed the CPS-3 Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) on two occasions (FFQ1 and FFQ2) and up to six 24-hour dietary recalls (24HRs) over one year. Plant-based diet scores were calculated using energy-adjusted food group intakes from each FFQ and mean 24HRs. Pearson correlations were used to evaluate reproducibility of each score between FFQs. Validity of the scores derived from FFQ2 were assessed relative to the mean of the 24HRs and blood and urine biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pearson correlations for reproducibility between FFQs for men and women, were 0.64 and 0.66 for PDI, 0.85 and 0.80 for hPDI, and 0.84 and 0.78 for uPDI. Pearson correlations for validity between FFQ2 and the mean 24HRs for PDI, hPDI, and uPDI for men were 0.54, 0.68, and 0.60 and for women were 0.66, 0.80, and 0.78. Biomarkers of most carotenoids, total protein, sodium, and potassium showed correlations ≥ 0.20 with certain plant-based diet scores. Reproducibility and validity were moderate to good in all racial/ethnic subgroups and were highest in non-Hispanic White adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was good reproducibility and moderate to good validity of plant-based diet indices within the CPS-3 FFQ. Future work should continue to validate these indices across populations with varied diets and dietary measurement tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.11.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Overall Plant-based Diet Index (PDI), the Healthful Plant-based Diet Index (hPDI), and the Unhealthful Plant-based Diet Index (uPDI) are relatively new tools for characterizing the quality of plant-based dietary patterns in epidemiological studies. Reproducibility and validity of these indices have not been assessed across populations.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and validity of PDI, hPDI and uPDI in a racially and ethnically diverse population.

Methods: Participants (n=433 women, n=244 men, n=417 non-Hispanic White, n=159 non-Hispanic Black, n=101 Hispanic) from the 2015-2016 Cancer Prevention Study 3 Dietary Assessment Sub-Study (CPS-3 DAS) completed the CPS-3 Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) on two occasions (FFQ1 and FFQ2) and up to six 24-hour dietary recalls (24HRs) over one year. Plant-based diet scores were calculated using energy-adjusted food group intakes from each FFQ and mean 24HRs. Pearson correlations were used to evaluate reproducibility of each score between FFQs. Validity of the scores derived from FFQ2 were assessed relative to the mean of the 24HRs and blood and urine biomarkers.

Results: Pearson correlations for reproducibility between FFQs for men and women, were 0.64 and 0.66 for PDI, 0.85 and 0.80 for hPDI, and 0.84 and 0.78 for uPDI. Pearson correlations for validity between FFQ2 and the mean 24HRs for PDI, hPDI, and uPDI for men were 0.54, 0.68, and 0.60 and for women were 0.66, 0.80, and 0.78. Biomarkers of most carotenoids, total protein, sodium, and potassium showed correlations ≥ 0.20 with certain plant-based diet scores. Reproducibility and validity were moderate to good in all racial/ethnic subgroups and were highest in non-Hispanic White adults.

Conclusions: There was good reproducibility and moderate to good validity of plant-based diet indices within the CPS-3 FFQ. Future work should continue to validate these indices across populations with varied diets and dietary measurement tools.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症预防研究-3 饮食评估子研究中植物性膳食指数的再现性和有效性。
背景:总体植物性膳食指数(PDI)、健康植物性膳食指数(hPDI)和不健康植物性膳食指数(uPDI)是流行病学研究中描述植物性膳食模式质量的相对较新的工具。这些指数在不同人群中的可重复性和有效性尚未得到评估:本研究旨在评估 PDI、hPDI 和 uPDI 在不同种族和民族人群中的再现性和有效性:2015-2016年癌症预防研究3膳食评估子研究(CPS-3 DAS)的参与者(女性433人,男性244人,非西班牙裔白人417人,非西班牙裔黑人159人,西班牙裔101人)完成了两次CPS-3食物频率问卷(FFQ1和FFQ2)和一年内最多6次24小时膳食回忆(24HR)。根据每次 FFQ 和 24HR 平均值中能量调整后的食物组摄入量计算植物基膳食得分。皮尔逊相关性用于评估各 FFQ 之间各分值的再现性。相对于 24 小时健康记录平均值以及血液和尿液生物标志物,对 FFQ2 得出的分数的有效性进行了评估:男性和女性 FFQ 之间的皮尔逊相关性分别为:PDI 为 0.64 和 0.66,hPDI 为 0.85 和 0.80,uPDI 为 0.84 和 0.78。男性 FFQ2 与 PDI、hPDI 和 uPDI 24 小时平均值之间的皮尔逊相关性分别为 0.54、0.68 和 0.60,女性分别为 0.66、0.80 和 0.78。大多数类胡萝卜素、总蛋白、钠和钾的生物标志物与某些植物性膳食得分的相关性≥0.20。在所有种族/人种亚群中,再现性和有效性为中等至良好,非西班牙裔白人成人的再现性和有效性最高:结论:CPS-3 FFQ 中的植物性饮食指数具有良好的再现性和中度到良好的有效性。未来的工作应继续在不同饮食习惯和饮食测量工具的人群中验证这些指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
期刊最新文献
Reproducibility and Validity of Plant-Based Dietary Indices in the Cancer Prevention Study-3 Diet Assessment Sub-Study. Abomasal infusion of deuterium-labeled choline confirms that choline is a methyl donor in gestating and lactating Holstein dairy cattle. Understanding the anti-cancer effects of phytochemicals: from molecular docking to anti-carcinogenic signaling. Regular use of fish oil supplements, Life's Essential 8 score, and cardiovascular mortality in people with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study. Metabolic mechanisms underlying the association between the pro-fertility diet and in vitro fertilization endpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1