Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) exposure in wildlife professionals.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1466981
Danilo Alves de França, Louise Bach Kmetiuk, Orlei José Domingues Rodrigues, Giovanni Augusto Kalempa Panazzolo, Vivien Midori Morikawa, Ana Íris de Lima Duré, Helio Langoni, Giovani Marino Fávero, Alexander Welker Biondo
{"title":"<i>Coxiella</i> <i>burnetii</i> (Q fever) exposure in wildlife professionals.","authors":"Danilo Alves de França, Louise Bach Kmetiuk, Orlei José Domingues Rodrigues, Giovanni Augusto Kalempa Panazzolo, Vivien Midori Morikawa, Ana Íris de Lima Duré, Helio Langoni, Giovani Marino Fávero, Alexander Welker Biondo","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1466981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although occupational exposure to <i>Coxiella burnetii</i> has been studied previously, the zoonotic risk in wildlife environments remains unclear and has yet to be fully established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accordingly, the present study aimed to serologically assess professionals with daily contact with free-living and captive wildlife in Paraná State, Brazil, along with the potential associated risk factors for <i>C. burnetii</i> exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 25 out of 309 (8.1%) wildlife professionals were seropositive, including 6/54 (11.1%) national and 7/125 (5.6%) state park employees, 6/92 (6.5%) zookeepers, and 6/38 (15.8%) animal service workers, with titers ranging from 32 to 128. No statistical association was found between seropositivity and associated risk factors, including the working location.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results differ from those of previous studies in Brazil, which found 8/893 (0.9%) indigenous, 1/18 (5.5%) police officers, and 44/200 (22.0%) former Black slaves to be seropositive. This study is the first serological investigation of <i>C. burnetii</i> among park rangers, zookeepers, and animal service workers in Brazil, showing no statistically significant risk factors for seropositivity. As the seroprevalence in this study was higher than that in previous surveys of healthy (asymptomatic) human populations, <i>C. burnetii</i> exposure may also be an occupational risk for wildlife professionals owing to their contact with the natural environment in Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1466981"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1466981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although occupational exposure to Coxiella burnetii has been studied previously, the zoonotic risk in wildlife environments remains unclear and has yet to be fully established.

Methods: Accordingly, the present study aimed to serologically assess professionals with daily contact with free-living and captive wildlife in Paraná State, Brazil, along with the potential associated risk factors for C. burnetii exposure.

Results: Overall, 25 out of 309 (8.1%) wildlife professionals were seropositive, including 6/54 (11.1%) national and 7/125 (5.6%) state park employees, 6/92 (6.5%) zookeepers, and 6/38 (15.8%) animal service workers, with titers ranging from 32 to 128. No statistical association was found between seropositivity and associated risk factors, including the working location.

Discussion: Our results differ from those of previous studies in Brazil, which found 8/893 (0.9%) indigenous, 1/18 (5.5%) police officers, and 44/200 (22.0%) former Black slaves to be seropositive. This study is the first serological investigation of C. burnetii among park rangers, zookeepers, and animal service workers in Brazil, showing no statistically significant risk factors for seropositivity. As the seroprevalence in this study was higher than that in previous surveys of healthy (asymptomatic) human populations, C. burnetii exposure may also be an occupational risk for wildlife professionals owing to their contact with the natural environment in Brazil.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野生动物专业人员接触烧伤柯西氏菌(Q 热)的情况。
引言:尽管以前对职业性接触烧伤柯西氏菌进行过研究,但野生动物环境中的人畜共患风险仍不清楚,也尚未完全确定:尽管此前已对职业暴露于烧伤科克西氏菌进行过研究,但野生动物环境中的人畜共患病风险仍不清楚,也尚未完全确定:因此,本研究旨在对巴西巴拉那州每天接触自由生活和人工饲养野生动物的专业人员进行血清学评估,并评估接触烧伤梭菌的潜在相关风险因素:总体而言,309 位野生动物专业人员中有 25 位(8.1%)血清反应呈阳性,其中包括 6/54 位(11.1%)国家公园员工和 7/125 位(5.6%)州立公园员工、6/92 位(6.5%)动物园管理员和 6/38 位(15.8%)动物服务人员,滴度范围从 32 到 128 不等。血清阳性与相关风险因素(包括工作地点)之间没有统计学关联:我们的研究结果与之前在巴西进行的研究结果不同,之前的研究发现,8/893(0.9%)名土著人、1/18(5.5%)名警察和44/200(22.0%)名前黑人奴隶的血清反应呈阳性。这项研究是巴西首次对公园管理员、动物园管理员和动物服务人员中的烧伤蜱进行血清学调查,结果显示血清阳性的风险因素在统计学上并不显著。由于本研究中的血清阳性率高于以往对健康(无症状)人群的调查,因此,由于野生动物专业人员与巴西的自然环境有接触,他们也可能面临接触伯奈氏菌的职业风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
Data-driven analysis of the effect of screening and treatment on the spread of HIV in developing and developed countries. Effect of whole-day work on surgical performance during simulated laparoscopic surgery: study protocol for a controlled cross over laboratory trial. Effectiveness of financial incentives for control of viral hepatitis among substance users: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Applying Community-based System Dynamics to promote child health equity: the case of healthy and fit kids in Milwaukee, WI. Comparative analysis of volatility forecasting for healthcare stock indices amid public health crises: a study based on the Bayes-CNN model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1