Relationship Distance as Facework Strategy: Family Members' Account for Non-Support to Cancer Patients.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2434694
Kaibin Xu, Yating Liu
{"title":"Relationship Distance as Facework Strategy: Family Members' Account for Non-Support to Cancer Patients.","authors":"Kaibin Xu, Yating Liu","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2434694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on observations and interviews at a comprehensive hospital in China, this study explored how family members engaged in facework to explain their nonsupport to cancer patients. The findings reveal that family members employed relationship distance as a facework strategy in two relationship contexts. In the patient-self dyad, family members used \"drawing closer to the patient\" (e.g. following the patient's wishes) and \"pulling away from the patient\" (e.g. putting the nuclear family first) to account for nonsupport. Within the patient-spouse-adult children-siblings multi-ring relationship, family members in outer circles used \"staying away from the patient\" and highlighting inner circle roles (e.g. the patient's siblings narrowly defined the concept of family); those in inner circles used \"pulling outer circle roles close to the patient\" (e.g. the spouse values the opinion of the adult children or the patient's siblings); and family members in the same circle highlighted \"the same distance with the patient\" (e.g. emphasizing the common responsibilities of each child). This study expanded the relationship-centered inquiry into nonsupport from a narrow patient-supporter dyad to a patient-centered, multi-ring relationship network that includes all potential supporters.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2434694","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on observations and interviews at a comprehensive hospital in China, this study explored how family members engaged in facework to explain their nonsupport to cancer patients. The findings reveal that family members employed relationship distance as a facework strategy in two relationship contexts. In the patient-self dyad, family members used "drawing closer to the patient" (e.g. following the patient's wishes) and "pulling away from the patient" (e.g. putting the nuclear family first) to account for nonsupport. Within the patient-spouse-adult children-siblings multi-ring relationship, family members in outer circles used "staying away from the patient" and highlighting inner circle roles (e.g. the patient's siblings narrowly defined the concept of family); those in inner circles used "pulling outer circle roles close to the patient" (e.g. the spouse values the opinion of the adult children or the patient's siblings); and family members in the same circle highlighted "the same distance with the patient" (e.g. emphasizing the common responsibilities of each child). This study expanded the relationship-centered inquiry into nonsupport from a narrow patient-supporter dyad to a patient-centered, multi-ring relationship network that includes all potential supporters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为面对面工作策略的关系距离:家庭成员对不支持癌症患者的解释
本研究基于对中国一家综合医院的观察和访谈,探讨了家庭成员如何通过面子工作来解释他们对癌症患者的不支持。研究结果显示,在两种关系背景下,家庭成员采用了关系距离作为面子工作策略。在患者与自己的关系中,家庭成员用 "拉近与患者的距离"(如遵从患者的意愿)和 "拉开与患者的距离"(如将核心家庭放在首位)来解释他们不支持患者的原因。在患者-配偶-成年子女-兄弟姐妹的多圈层关系中,外圈层的家庭成员使用 "远离患者 "并强调内圈层的角色(例如,患者的兄弟姐妹对家庭概念的定义狭隘);内圈层的家庭成员使用 "将外圈层的角色拉近患者"(例如,配偶重视成年子女或患者兄弟姐妹的意见);同一圈层的家庭成员则强调 "与患者保持同样的距离"(例如,强调每个子女的共同责任)。这项研究将以关系为中心的非支持调查从狭隘的患者-支持者二元对立关系扩展到以患者为中心的多环关系网络,其中包括所有潜在的支持者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
"Feeling the Pain of Others": Examining the Framing Effects of Cancer Metaphors on Media Vicarious Traumatization. A Longitudinal Interview Study of People with Long COVID: Uncertainties, Liminality, and Processes of Becoming. Exploring the Cognitive, Affective, and Conative Factors of Bystander Intervention to Improve Protective Measures During Health Emergencies. Disseminating Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder Information on TikTok: A Content Analysis. Does Character-Audience Matching Increase the Persuasive Impact of Anti-Sugar-Sweetened-Beverage (SSB) Consumption Messages?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1