A Validated Electronic Medical Record-Based Algorithm to Identify Hospitalized Patients with Serious Illness.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0285
Laura A Schoenherr, Yuika Goto, Joanna Sharpless, David L O'Riordan, Steven Z Pantilat
{"title":"A Validated Electronic Medical Record-Based Algorithm to Identify Hospitalized Patients with Serious Illness.","authors":"Laura A Schoenherr, Yuika Goto, Joanna Sharpless, David L O'Riordan, Steven Z Pantilat","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Population-based methods to identify patients with serious illness are necessary to provide equitable and efficient access to palliative care services. <b><i>Aim:</i></b> Create a validated algorithm embedded in the electronic medical record (EMR) to identify hospitalized patients with serious illness. <b><i>Design:</i></b> An initial algorithm, developed from literature review and clinical experience, was twice adjusted based on gaps identified from chart review. Each iteration was validated by comparing the algorithm's results for a subset of patients (approximately 10% of the populations screened in and screened out on a given day) with the expert consensus of two independent palliative care physicians. <b><i>Settings/Subjects:</i></b> The final algorithm was run daily for nine months to screen all hospitalized adults at our academic medical center in the United States. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Compared with the gold standard of expert consensus, the final algorithm for identifying hospitalized patients with serious illness was found to have a sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 82%, positive predictive value of 80%, and negative predictive value of 90%. At our hospital, an average of 284 patients a day (54%) screened positive for at least one criterion, with an average of 38 patients newly screening positive daily. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Data from the EMR can identify hospitalized patients with serious illness who may benefit from palliative care services, an important first step in moving to a system in which palliative care is provided proactively and systematically to all who could benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Population-based methods to identify patients with serious illness are necessary to provide equitable and efficient access to palliative care services. Aim: Create a validated algorithm embedded in the electronic medical record (EMR) to identify hospitalized patients with serious illness. Design: An initial algorithm, developed from literature review and clinical experience, was twice adjusted based on gaps identified from chart review. Each iteration was validated by comparing the algorithm's results for a subset of patients (approximately 10% of the populations screened in and screened out on a given day) with the expert consensus of two independent palliative care physicians. Settings/Subjects: The final algorithm was run daily for nine months to screen all hospitalized adults at our academic medical center in the United States. Results: Compared with the gold standard of expert consensus, the final algorithm for identifying hospitalized patients with serious illness was found to have a sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 82%, positive predictive value of 80%, and negative predictive value of 90%. At our hospital, an average of 284 patients a day (54%) screened positive for at least one criterion, with an average of 38 patients newly screening positive daily. Conclusions: Data from the EMR can identify hospitalized patients with serious illness who may benefit from palliative care services, an important first step in moving to a system in which palliative care is provided proactively and systematically to all who could benefit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于电子病历的验证算法,用于识别重症住院病人。
背景:为提供公平有效的姑息关怀服务,有必要采用基于人群的方法来识别重病患者。目的:创建一种嵌入电子病历(EMR)的有效算法,以识别住院重症患者。设计:根据文献综述和临床经验开发的初始算法,根据病历审查中发现的差距进行了两次调整。每次迭代都会将算法对患者子集(约占特定日期筛查入院和筛查出院人数的 10%)的结果与两名独立姑息治疗医生的专家共识进行比较,从而对算法进行验证。设置/受试者:在为期九个月的时间里,我们每天都对美国学术医疗中心的所有住院成人患者进行筛查。结果:与专家共识的黄金标准相比,识别重症住院患者的最终算法灵敏度为 89%,特异度为 82%,阳性预测值为 80%,阴性预测值为 90%。在我们医院,平均每天有 284 名病人(54%)在至少一项标准上筛查出阳性,平均每天有 38 名病人新筛查出阳性。结论:从电子病历(EMR)中获取的数据可以识别出可能受益于姑息关怀服务的重症住院病人,这是向主动、系统地为所有可能受益者提供姑息关怀服务的系统迈出的重要的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes Toward Medical Assistance in Dying Among Swedish Palliative Care Professionals. Palliative Care and Intensivists' Different Perspectives on Specialist Palliative Care Engagement in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Care. Patterns of Specialty Palliative Consultation for Patients Admitted to Surgical Services. Letter to the Editor: "No-Shows" and Missed Opportunities: Reasons for Missed In-Person and Telehealth Appointments in an Ambulatory Palliative Care Program. What Matters to Older Native Hawaiians?: A Qualitative Study of Care Preferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1