Comparison of Effectiveness of Brivaracetam and Levetiracetam for Prophylaxis of Early Post-Traumatic Seizures: A Prospective Comparative Interventional Study.

Asian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-10 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1790516
Rajan Pandya, Ponraj Kamatchi Sundaram, Shashank Singh Baghel
{"title":"Comparison of Effectiveness of Brivaracetam and Levetiracetam for Prophylaxis of Early Post-Traumatic Seizures: A Prospective Comparative Interventional Study.","authors":"Rajan Pandya, Ponraj Kamatchi Sundaram, Shashank Singh Baghel","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1790516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Early posttraumatic seizures (EPTS) are a major complication after a head injury, defined as seizures developing within the first 7 days of trauma. Levetiracetam has become a popular drug for the prevention of posttraumatic seizures in institutions worldwide. However, it has been reportedly associated with adverse effects like behavioral changes and somnolence. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a newer drug, brivaracetam, which is reported to have a better pharmacokinetic profile. These findings may be significant in providing a safer yet efficacious alternative to levetiracetam. <b>Objective</b>  The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of brivaracetam for prophylaxis of EPTS and to compare it with levetiracetam. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  A prospective, single-blind, parallel-group (alternate allocation) controlled trial over 100 patients admitted with traumatic brain injury in the Department of Neurosurgery, Goa Medical College, Panaji, Goa, India. The data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0. <b>Results</b>  Twenty patients developed EPTS in the study group: 8 from the group receiving brivaracetam and 12 from the group receiving levetiracetam. Although the brivaracetam group had a lower incidence of EPTS, the difference was not statistically significant. Eleven patients from the levetiracetam group developed side effects, while six patients from the brivaracetam group had side effects. There was no significant difference in the incidence of side effects. <b>Conclusion</b>  Brivaracetam has efficacy equal to that of levetiracetam for prophylaxis of EPTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"19 4","pages":"728-734"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Early posttraumatic seizures (EPTS) are a major complication after a head injury, defined as seizures developing within the first 7 days of trauma. Levetiracetam has become a popular drug for the prevention of posttraumatic seizures in institutions worldwide. However, it has been reportedly associated with adverse effects like behavioral changes and somnolence. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a newer drug, brivaracetam, which is reported to have a better pharmacokinetic profile. These findings may be significant in providing a safer yet efficacious alternative to levetiracetam. Objective  The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of brivaracetam for prophylaxis of EPTS and to compare it with levetiracetam. Materials and Methods  A prospective, single-blind, parallel-group (alternate allocation) controlled trial over 100 patients admitted with traumatic brain injury in the Department of Neurosurgery, Goa Medical College, Panaji, Goa, India. The data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0. Results  Twenty patients developed EPTS in the study group: 8 from the group receiving brivaracetam and 12 from the group receiving levetiracetam. Although the brivaracetam group had a lower incidence of EPTS, the difference was not statistically significant. Eleven patients from the levetiracetam group developed side effects, while six patients from the brivaracetam group had side effects. There was no significant difference in the incidence of side effects. Conclusion  Brivaracetam has efficacy equal to that of levetiracetam for prophylaxis of EPTS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较 Brivaracetam 和 Levetiracetam 对创伤后早期癫痫发作的预防效果:前瞻性比较干预研究》。
导言:早期创伤后癫痫发作(EPTS)是头部受伤后的一种主要并发症,是指在创伤后 7 天内出现的癫痫发作。左乙拉西坦已成为世界各地医疗机构预防创伤后癫痫发作的常用药物。然而,有报道称它与行为改变和嗜睡等不良反应有关。本研究旨在比较一种较新的药物--布利瓦西坦的疗效,据报道,布利瓦西坦具有更好的药代动力学特征。这些发现对于提供一种更安全、更有效的左乙拉西坦替代药物可能具有重要意义。目的 本研究旨在评估布伐他塞坦预防 EPTS 的疗效,并将其与左乙拉西坦进行比较。材料与方法 印度果阿邦帕纳吉果阿医学院神经外科对 100 名脑外伤患者进行了前瞻性、单盲、平行组(交替分配)对照试验。数据使用 IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0 进行分析。结果 研究组中有 20 名患者出现 EPTS:接受溴伐他西坦治疗组 8 人,接受左乙拉西坦治疗组 12 人。虽然溴伐他西坦组的 EPTS 发生率较低,但差异无统计学意义。左乙拉西坦组有 11 名患者出现副作用,而双伐他西坦组有 6 名患者出现副作用。副作用的发生率没有明显差异。结论 Brivaracetam 对预防 EPTS 的疗效与左乙拉西坦相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transient Perioperative Aggressive Behavior during Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's disease. A Case of Burr Hole Drainage and Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma Associated with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Gliomas: A Rare Insight into Microsatellite Instability and Its Diagnostic Implications. Clinico-Histomorphological and Mib-1 Analysis of Recurrent Meningiomas: A Retrospective Study. Coexisting Hemorrhagic Cerebral Cavernous Malformation and Developmental Venous Anomaly Resulting in Frontal Lobe Seizures: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1