The volatile metabolome — gas chromatography–mass spectrometry approaches in the context of food fraud

IF 8.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Current Opinion in Food Science Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.cofs.2024.101235
Beatriz Quintanilla-Casas , Berta Torres-Cobos , Rasmus Bro , Francesc Guardiola , Stefania Vichi , Alba Tres
{"title":"The volatile metabolome — gas chromatography–mass spectrometry approaches in the context of food fraud","authors":"Beatriz Quintanilla-Casas ,&nbsp;Berta Torres-Cobos ,&nbsp;Rasmus Bro ,&nbsp;Francesc Guardiola ,&nbsp;Stefania Vichi ,&nbsp;Alba Tres","doi":"10.1016/j.cofs.2024.101235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This work discusses food authentication tools based on the volatile metabolome assessed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) serve as markers for food flavor and aroma, and in some cases, they hold potential for food authentication. On top of this, advanced data analysis approaches enhance analytical data extraction and understanding. Untargeted methods provide comprehensive authenticity insights, surpassing traditional targeted approaches, and automated processing improves robustness and reduces user dependency. Chemometric tools, particularly classification methods, are extensively used for authentication based on both GC-MS fingerprinting and untargeted profiling of VOCs. Despite challenges in transferability, untargeted methods perform well in authentication models, making them valuable for internal quality control and official control guidance for fraud detection. This work highlights the need for further research to establish untargeted authentication tools as official methods in the near future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54291,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Food Science","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101235"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214799324001139","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work discusses food authentication tools based on the volatile metabolome assessed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) serve as markers for food flavor and aroma, and in some cases, they hold potential for food authentication. On top of this, advanced data analysis approaches enhance analytical data extraction and understanding. Untargeted methods provide comprehensive authenticity insights, surpassing traditional targeted approaches, and automated processing improves robustness and reduces user dependency. Chemometric tools, particularly classification methods, are extensively used for authentication based on both GC-MS fingerprinting and untargeted profiling of VOCs. Despite challenges in transferability, untargeted methods perform well in authentication models, making them valuable for internal quality control and official control guidance for fraud detection. This work highlights the need for further research to establish untargeted authentication tools as official methods in the near future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挥发性代谢组-气相色谱-质谱法在食品欺诈中的应用
本工作讨论了基于气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)评估的挥发性代谢组的食品认证工具。挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)是食品风味和香气的标志,在某些情况下,它们具有食品认证的潜力。在此基础上,先进的数据分析方法增强了分析数据的提取和理解。非目标方法提供了全面的真实性洞察,超越了传统的目标方法,自动化处理提高了鲁棒性并减少了用户依赖性。化学计量学工具,特别是分类方法,广泛用于基于气相色谱-质谱指纹识别和非靶向VOCs分析的认证。尽管在可转移性方面存在挑战,但非目标方法在身份验证模型中表现良好,使其对内部质量控制和欺诈检测的官方控制指导具有价值。这项工作强调了在不久的将来需要进一步研究以建立非目标身份验证工具作为官方方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Food Science
Current Opinion in Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Food Science specifically provides expert views on current advances in food science in a clear and readable format. It also evaluates the most noteworthy papers from original publications, annotated by experts. Key Features: Expert Views on Current Advances: Clear and readable insights from experts in the field regarding current advances in food science. Evaluation of Noteworthy Papers: Annotated evaluations of the most interesting papers from the extensive array of original publications. Themed Sections: The subject of food science is divided into themed sections, each reviewed once a year.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Current and emerging issues in chemical food safety The chrononutrition of human milk: role of the circadian variation in human milk composition on sleep–wake regulation and brain development of infant Editorial Board Comparison of fatty acid characteristics in human milk, bovine milk, and infant formula for better emulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1