Artificial intelligence in community pharmacy practice: Pharmacists' perceptions, willingness to utilize, and barriers to implementation

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100542
Ashenafi Kibret Sendekie , Liknaw Workie Limenh , Biruk Beletew Abate , Gashaw Sisay Chanie , Abebe Tarekegn Kassaw , Fasil Bayafers Tamene , Kalab Yigermal Gete , Ephrem Mebratu Dagnew
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in community pharmacy practice: Pharmacists' perceptions, willingness to utilize, and barriers to implementation","authors":"Ashenafi Kibret Sendekie ,&nbsp;Liknaw Workie Limenh ,&nbsp;Biruk Beletew Abate ,&nbsp;Gashaw Sisay Chanie ,&nbsp;Abebe Tarekegn Kassaw ,&nbsp;Fasil Bayafers Tamene ,&nbsp;Kalab Yigermal Gete ,&nbsp;Ephrem Mebratu Dagnew","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) has a significant potential to impact pharmacy practices worldwide. This study investigates pharmacists' perceptions of AI's role in pharmacy practices, their willingness to adopt it, and perceived barriers to its implementation at community pharmacies in Ethiopia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted among community pharmacists in Ethiopia. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Independent samples <em>t</em>-test, one-way ANOVA, and post-hoc analyses were used to compare pharmacists' perception and willingness scores. A linear regression analysis examined the association of independent variables with pharmacists' perception of AI and willingness to utilize AI. A <em>p</em>-value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 241 pharmacists approached, 225 (93.3 %) completed the survey. Overall, about two-thirds (67.1 % and 66.2 %) of community pharmacists had a high level of perception and willingness to use AI applications in pharmacy, respectively. Pharmacists with bachelor's degrees and above (β = 2.76: 95 % CI: 0.09, 5.01 vs. β = 1.79: 95 % CI: 0.05, 4.21), those who utilized scientific drug information sources (β = 2.45, 95 %: 0.17, 4.45 vs. β = 1.76, 95 % CI: 0.91, 3.89), pharmacists who had a previous exposure of AI (β = 1.02, 95 %: 0.03, 3.24 vs. β =1.13, 95 % CI: 0.07, 2.93), and those who with higher perceived AI knowledge (β =1.09, 95 % CI: 0.02, 2.46 vs. β = 1.14, 95 %CI: 0.17, 3.11) had significantly higher perception of AI and willingness to utilize it, respectively compared to their counterparts. Lack of internet availability (89.3 %), lack of AI-related software/hardware (88.2 %), and limited training (80.9 %) were the most frequently reported barriers by pharmacists to AI adoption. Over 90 % of pharmacists agreed on the importance of internet availability (93.3 %), policies/frameworks (91.6 %), and research/learning from others (89.3 %) for successful AI integration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite positive perceptions and willingness from pharmacists, AI implementation in community pharmacies could be hindered by resource limitations, training gaps, skill constraints, and infrastructure issues. To facilitate adoption, enhancing knowledge and skills, and developing policies/frameworks are crucial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100542"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624001392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) has a significant potential to impact pharmacy practices worldwide. This study investigates pharmacists' perceptions of AI's role in pharmacy practices, their willingness to adopt it, and perceived barriers to its implementation at community pharmacies in Ethiopia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among community pharmacists in Ethiopia. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, and post-hoc analyses were used to compare pharmacists' perception and willingness scores. A linear regression analysis examined the association of independent variables with pharmacists' perception of AI and willingness to utilize AI. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of 241 pharmacists approached, 225 (93.3 %) completed the survey. Overall, about two-thirds (67.1 % and 66.2 %) of community pharmacists had a high level of perception and willingness to use AI applications in pharmacy, respectively. Pharmacists with bachelor's degrees and above (β = 2.76: 95 % CI: 0.09, 5.01 vs. β = 1.79: 95 % CI: 0.05, 4.21), those who utilized scientific drug information sources (β = 2.45, 95 %: 0.17, 4.45 vs. β = 1.76, 95 % CI: 0.91, 3.89), pharmacists who had a previous exposure of AI (β = 1.02, 95 %: 0.03, 3.24 vs. β =1.13, 95 % CI: 0.07, 2.93), and those who with higher perceived AI knowledge (β =1.09, 95 % CI: 0.02, 2.46 vs. β = 1.14, 95 %CI: 0.17, 3.11) had significantly higher perception of AI and willingness to utilize it, respectively compared to their counterparts. Lack of internet availability (89.3 %), lack of AI-related software/hardware (88.2 %), and limited training (80.9 %) were the most frequently reported barriers by pharmacists to AI adoption. Over 90 % of pharmacists agreed on the importance of internet availability (93.3 %), policies/frameworks (91.6 %), and research/learning from others (89.3 %) for successful AI integration.

Conclusion

Despite positive perceptions and willingness from pharmacists, AI implementation in community pharmacies could be hindered by resource limitations, training gaps, skill constraints, and infrastructure issues. To facilitate adoption, enhancing knowledge and skills, and developing policies/frameworks are crucial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区药房实践中的人工智能:药剂师的认知、使用意愿和实施障碍
人工智能(AI)具有影响全球药学实践的巨大潜力。本研究调查了药剂师对人工智能在药房实践中的作用的看法,他们采用人工智能的意愿,以及在埃塞俄比亚社区药房实施人工智能的障碍。方法对埃塞俄比亚社区药师进行横断面调查。数据是通过自我管理的问卷收集的。采用独立样本t检验、单因素方差分析和事后分析比较药师的感知和意愿得分。线性回归分析检验了自变量与药剂师对人工智能的认知和使用人工智能的意愿之间的关系。p值<;0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果241名受访药师中,有225名(93.3%)完成了调查。总体而言,约三分之二(67.1%和66.2%)的社区药剂师分别对在药学中使用人工智能应用有很高的认知和意愿。药剂师拥有学士学位及以上(β= 2.76,95% CI: 0.09、5.01与β= 1.79:95%置信区间:0.05 - 4.21),那些利用科学药物信息来源(β= 2.45,95%:0.17,4.45和β= 1.76,95% CI: 0.91, 3.89),药剂师之前曝光的AI(β= 1.02,95%:0.03,3.24和β= 1.13,95% CI: 0.07, 2.93),以及那些认为更高的人工智能知识(β= 1.09,95% CI: 0.02、2.46与β= 1.14,95%置信区间CI:0.17, 3.11)对人工智能的认知和使用意愿显著高于同行。缺乏互联网可用性(89.3%)、缺乏与人工智能相关的软件/硬件(88.2%)和有限的培训(80.9%)是药剂师最常报告的采用人工智能的障碍。超过90%的药剂师同意互联网可用性(93.3%)、政策/框架(91.6%)和研究/向他人学习(89.3%)对成功整合人工智能的重要性。结论尽管药师有积极的认知和意愿,但人工智能在社区药房的实施可能会受到资源限制、培训差距、技能限制和基础设施问题的阻碍。为促进采用,加强知识和技能以及制定政策/框架至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Effects of a community pharmacy cardiovascular practice transformation (CPT) program on blood pressure. Knowledge, perceptions, facilitators, and barriers towards asthma self-management among patients: A systematic review of the literature. Co-development of a community pharmacy training regarding fentanyl and xylazine test strips. Bridging gaps in medication therapy management at community health centers: A mixed-methods study on patient perceptions and pharmacists' preparedness. Assessing community antibiotic usage and adherence as per standard treatment guidelines: A potential area to enhance awareness at community pharmacy settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1