Évaluation de la réponse des lymphomes en TDM : de CHESON à RECIL

E. de Kerviler, C. de Margerie-Mellon
{"title":"Évaluation de la réponse des lymphomes en TDM : de CHESON à RECIL","authors":"E. de Kerviler,&nbsp;C. de Margerie-Mellon","doi":"10.1016/j.mednuc.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In oncology, the use of standardized criteria to assess tumor response is crucial in clinical trials and routine care. Before 1999, criteria for malignant lymphomas were highly variable, complicating comparisons and assessment of treatment efficacy. This need for standardization to improve the reliability of results, particularly regarding normal lymph node size and how response is measured and assessed, led to the development of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and Cheson criteria for lymphomas. The recent Response Evaluation Criteria in Lymphoma (RECIL), were specifically developed for the assessment of response to treatment in lymphomas, but these criteria are imperfect and the trend is to use the Lugano criteria instead.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49841,"journal":{"name":"Medecine Nucleaire-Imagerie Fonctionnelle et Metabolique","volume":"48 6","pages":"Pages 245-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine Nucleaire-Imagerie Fonctionnelle et Metabolique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928125824002547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In oncology, the use of standardized criteria to assess tumor response is crucial in clinical trials and routine care. Before 1999, criteria for malignant lymphomas were highly variable, complicating comparisons and assessment of treatment efficacy. This need for standardization to improve the reliability of results, particularly regarding normal lymph node size and how response is measured and assessed, led to the development of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and Cheson criteria for lymphomas. The recent Response Evaluation Criteria in Lymphoma (RECIL), were specifically developed for the assessment of response to treatment in lymphomas, but these criteria are imperfect and the trend is to use the Lugano criteria instead.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从CHESON到RECIL的TDM淋巴瘤反应评估
在肿瘤学中,使用标准化标准来评估肿瘤反应在临床试验和常规护理中至关重要。在1999年之前,恶性淋巴瘤的标准变化很大,这使得比较和评估治疗效果变得复杂。由于需要标准化以提高结果的可靠性,特别是关于正常淋巴结大小和如何测量和评估反应,导致了实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)和淋巴瘤Cheson标准的发展。最近的淋巴瘤反应评价标准(RECIL)是专门为评估淋巴瘤治疗反应而制定的,但这些标准并不完善,趋势是使用Lugano标准代替。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
19.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Le but de Médecine nucléaire - Imagerie fonctionnelle et métabolique est de fournir une plate-forme d''échange d''informations cliniques et scientifiques pour la communauté francophone de médecine nucléaire, et de constituer une expérience pédagogique de la rédaction médicale en conformité avec les normes internationales.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Retour d’expérience monocentrique à l’IUCTO sur l’impact des périodes de tension sur l’approvisionnement en 177Lu PSMA dans le cadre de l’accès précoce Étude rétrospective des données cliniques, biologiques et d’imagerie de l’efficacité thérapeutique du 223Ra-Dichloride dans le cancer de la prostate Un effet secondaire rare du 177Lu-PSMA : à propos d’un cas de micro-angiopathie thrombotique post-radiothérapie interne vectorisée À propos d’un cas : insuffisance rénale avec micro-angiopathie thrombotique secondaire à une radiothérapie interne par 177Lu PSMA 1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1