Peak V̇O2 during handcycling in spinal cord injured athletes: incremental versus verification testing.

Caio de Araújo Rosa, Diego Antunes, Thiago Pereira Ventura, Gabriela Fischer, Gary Brickley, Ricardo Dantas de Lucas, Tiago Turnes
{"title":"Peak V̇O<sub>2</sub> during handcycling in spinal cord injured athletes: incremental versus verification testing.","authors":"Caio de Araújo Rosa, Diego Antunes, Thiago Pereira Ventura, Gabriela Fischer, Gary Brickley, Ricardo Dantas de Lucas, Tiago Turnes","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2024-0193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to compare peak oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak), peak heart rate (HRpeak), and peak O<sub>2</sub>pulse during an incremental and a verification test performed on the same day in hand-cyclists with spinal cord injury (SCI). Eight competitive SCI hand-cyclists (age: 23 ± 2.7 years; V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak: 36.3 ± 14.0 mL.kg<sup>-1</sup>.min<sup>-1</sup>) performed a maximal incremental handcycling test and a verification test to exhaustion at 100% of the peak speed on an oversized treadmill. The V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak, HRpeak, and peak O<sub>2</sub>pulse (i.e., VO<sub>2</sub>/HR) were compared between incremental and verification tests. Absolute and relative V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak obtained in the verification test (2.51 ± 0.96 L.min<sup>-1</sup>; 36.3 ± 14.0 mL.kg.min<sup>-1</sup>) were significantly higher than values obtained in the incremental test (2.24 ± 0.79 L.min<sup>-1</sup>; 33.5 ± 12.9 mL.kg.min<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> < 0.05). The mean differences (95% CL) of absolute and relative V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak between tests were 8.2% (3.3%-13.2%) and 10.9% (4.3%-18.1%), respectively. There was no difference in HR peak (incremental: 169 ± 24 bpm; verification 167 ± 25 bpm; <i>P</i> = 0.130). Peak O<sub>2</sub>pulse from the verification test (14.6 ± 4.7 mL.beat<sup>-1</sup>) was higher than incremental test (13.0 ± 3.8 mL.beat<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> = 0.007). In conclusion, the verification test elicited greater V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak and O<sub>2</sub>pulse than a two-phase incremental test despite the similar HRpeak. This indicates that for this progressive protocol lasting ≥25 min, the verification phase adds value to determining V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak in SCI athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak), peak heart rate (HRpeak), and peak O2pulse during an incremental and a verification test performed on the same day in hand-cyclists with spinal cord injury (SCI). Eight competitive SCI hand-cyclists (age: 23 ± 2.7 years; V̇O2peak: 36.3 ± 14.0 mL.kg-1.min-1) performed a maximal incremental handcycling test and a verification test to exhaustion at 100% of the peak speed on an oversized treadmill. The V̇O2peak, HRpeak, and peak O2pulse (i.e., VO2/HR) were compared between incremental and verification tests. Absolute and relative V̇O2peak obtained in the verification test (2.51 ± 0.96 L.min-1; 36.3 ± 14.0 mL.kg.min-1) were significantly higher than values obtained in the incremental test (2.24 ± 0.79 L.min-1; 33.5 ± 12.9 mL.kg.min-1; P < 0.05). The mean differences (95% CL) of absolute and relative V̇O2peak between tests were 8.2% (3.3%-13.2%) and 10.9% (4.3%-18.1%), respectively. There was no difference in HR peak (incremental: 169 ± 24 bpm; verification 167 ± 25 bpm; P = 0.130). Peak O2pulse from the verification test (14.6 ± 4.7 mL.beat-1) was higher than incremental test (13.0 ± 3.8 mL.beat-1; P = 0.007). In conclusion, the verification test elicited greater V̇O2peak and O2pulse than a two-phase incremental test despite the similar HRpeak. This indicates that for this progressive protocol lasting ≥25 min, the verification phase adds value to determining V̇O2peak in SCI athletes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤运动员手骑时的峰值V / O2:增量试验与验证试验。
本研究旨在比较脊髓损伤(SCI)手骑自行车者在同一天进行的增量试验和验证试验中的峰值摄氧量(V O2峰值)、峰值心率(HRpeak)和峰值氧脉冲。8名SCI手单车选手(年龄:23±2.7岁;V / o峰值:2.24±0.79 l.min-1或36.3±14.0 ml.kg-1 min-1)在超大型跑步机上进行最大增量手扶试验和100% V / o峰值速度下的疲劳验证试验。比较增量试验和验证试验的V / o2峰、hr峰和峰值o2脉冲(即VO2/HR)。验证试验获得的V (o2)峰值(2.51±0.96 l.min-1)显著高于增量试验获得的值(2.24±0.79 l.min-1);P = 0.018)。两组心率峰值无差异(增量:169±24 bpm;验证167±25 bpm;P = 0.130)。验证试验的峰值o2脉冲(14.6±4.7 ml.beat-1)高于增量试验(13.0±3.8 ml.beat-1);P = 0.007)。与增量练习相比,验证测试中有6名受试者的变异性大于±4%。综上所述,在HR相似的情况下,验证试验获得的V o 2峰值高于增量试验,提示验证阶段与脊髓损伤手骑者的V o 2峰值确定有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Impact of High Theacrine Doses on Hemodynamic Measures, Cognitive Performance, and Physiological Stress. Potential effects of low calcium intake on body composition, muscle function, and appetite. Social and Cultural Determinants of Physical Fitness in Métis People Living in Saskatchewan. Football-Specific Training Characteristics and Changes in Bone Characteristics in Male Academy Football Players. Effect of Dairy Form on Cognitive Performance, Glycemic Response, and Subjective Emotions in Children Aged 9-14 Years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1