An automated blood test for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) to predict the absence of intracranial lesions on head CT in adult patients with mild traumatic brain injury: BRAINI, a multicentre observational study in Europe.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL EBioMedicine Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105477
Alfonso Lagares, Javier de la Cruz, Hugo Terrisse, Odile Mejan, Vladislav Pavlov, Celine Vermorel, Jean-François Payen
{"title":"An automated blood test for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) to predict the absence of intracranial lesions on head CT in adult patients with mild traumatic brain injury: BRAINI, a multicentre observational study in Europe.","authors":"Alfonso Lagares, Javier de la Cruz, Hugo Terrisse, Odile Mejan, Vladislav Pavlov, Celine Vermorel, Jean-François Payen","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), elevated concentrations of brain-specific blood proteins glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) may be indicative of intracranial lesions normally detected by head CT scans. We sought to validate the performance of this combination of biomarkers at predetermined cutoff values with an automated immunoassay to predict which patients did not have intracranial lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, observational study was conducted in France and Spain at 16 emergency departments. Adult patients with mTBI were eligible if they had a head CT scan and gave a 10-ml blood sample within 12 h of injury. GFAP and UCH-L1 serum concentrations were measured and analysed, in less than an hour time, according to predefined cutoff values of 22 pg/ml and 327 pg/ml, respectively. Serum concentrations of S100B protein were concomitantly determined in a subset of patients. The primary outcome measures were the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the combined GFAP-UCH-L1 test to rule out intracranial lesions on head CT scans.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov (NCT04032509).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between August 2019 and June 2021, 1508 patients were recruited, and 1438 were included in the main analysis. Median age was 69 years (IQR 44-83). Most patients (74%) presented 3 h after trauma. 179 (12.4%) patients were positive for intracranial lesions by CT. The sensitivity of the combined test was 98.3% (95% CI 95.0-99.7) and the specificity 24.9 (95% CI 22.6-27.4), with a NPV of 99.1% (95% CI 97.1-99.8). Three patients with a positive CT scan had negative biomarker test results. S100B had a sensitivity of 83.0% (95% CI 76.2-88.2) and a NPV of 94.2% (95% CI 91.6-96.0). Patients with higher biomarker values more frequently had poorer recovery at 3 months after injury.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Testing for GFAP and UCH-L1, using validated cutoffs obtained with a new, fast automated immunoassay platform, accurately predicted the absence of intracranial lesions on head CT following mTBI.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This study is co-funded by the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) Health, a body of the European Union (Grant nº19474). Biomarkers tests were funded by bioMérieux.</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":"110 ","pages":"105477"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105477","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), elevated concentrations of brain-specific blood proteins glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) may be indicative of intracranial lesions normally detected by head CT scans. We sought to validate the performance of this combination of biomarkers at predetermined cutoff values with an automated immunoassay to predict which patients did not have intracranial lesions.

Methods: This prospective, observational study was conducted in France and Spain at 16 emergency departments. Adult patients with mTBI were eligible if they had a head CT scan and gave a 10-ml blood sample within 12 h of injury. GFAP and UCH-L1 serum concentrations were measured and analysed, in less than an hour time, according to predefined cutoff values of 22 pg/ml and 327 pg/ml, respectively. Serum concentrations of S100B protein were concomitantly determined in a subset of patients. The primary outcome measures were the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the combined GFAP-UCH-L1 test to rule out intracranial lesions on head CT scans.

Clinicaltrials: gov (NCT04032509).

Findings: Between August 2019 and June 2021, 1508 patients were recruited, and 1438 were included in the main analysis. Median age was 69 years (IQR 44-83). Most patients (74%) presented 3 h after trauma. 179 (12.4%) patients were positive for intracranial lesions by CT. The sensitivity of the combined test was 98.3% (95% CI 95.0-99.7) and the specificity 24.9 (95% CI 22.6-27.4), with a NPV of 99.1% (95% CI 97.1-99.8). Three patients with a positive CT scan had negative biomarker test results. S100B had a sensitivity of 83.0% (95% CI 76.2-88.2) and a NPV of 94.2% (95% CI 91.6-96.0). Patients with higher biomarker values more frequently had poorer recovery at 3 months after injury.

Interpretation: Testing for GFAP and UCH-L1, using validated cutoffs obtained with a new, fast automated immunoassay platform, accurately predicted the absence of intracranial lesions on head CT following mTBI.

Funding: This study is co-funded by the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) Health, a body of the European Union (Grant nº19474). Biomarkers tests were funded by bioMérieux.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EBioMedicine
EBioMedicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.
期刊最新文献
Circadian clock disruption impairs immune oscillation in chronic endogenous hypercortisolism: a multi-level analysis from a multicentre clinical trial. Prediction of visceral leishmaniasis development in a highly exposed HIV cohort in Ethiopia based on Leishmania infection markers: results from the PreLeisH study. An automated blood test for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) to predict the absence of intracranial lesions on head CT in adult patients with mild traumatic brain injury: BRAINI, a multicentre observational study in Europe. Bivalent Omicron BA.1 vaccine booster increases memory B cell breadth and neutralising antibodies against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. FGF21 and its underlying adipose tissue-liver axis inform cardiometabolic burden and improvement in obesity after metabolic surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1