Empirical Approaches to the Classification of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS International Journal of Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1002/eat.24341
Brianne N Richson, Lauren M Schaefer, Kendra R Becker, Matthew F Murray, Kelly A Romano, Lisa M Anderson, Stephen A Wonderlich, Jennifer J Thomas
{"title":"Empirical Approaches to the Classification of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder.","authors":"Brianne N Richson, Lauren M Schaefer, Kendra R Becker, Matthew F Murray, Kelly A Romano, Lisa M Anderson, Stephen A Wonderlich, Jennifer J Thomas","doi":"10.1002/eat.24341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a relatively new formal diagnosis for which empirical classification research (defined here as studies using latent class/latent profile analysis-type methods) is still emerging. Such research focused on ARFID is an important gap to fill given questions about (1) the boundaries between ARFID and phenotypically similar presentations (e.g., eating disorders [EDs] such as anorexia nervosa [AN], and pediatric feeding disorder [PFD]), and (2) within-ARFID heterogeneity. These questions have practical implications, including diagnostic reliability and treatment selection.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This forum synthesizes the limited empirical classification literature seeking to quantitatively distinguish ARFID from non-ARFID EDs or from PFD, and/or characterize within-ARFID heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To our knowledge, only five studies in clinical samples have used empirical classification methods to delineate ARFID from non-ARFID EDs and/or characterize within-ARFID heterogeneity; no studies have used such methods to delineate ARFID from PFD. Existing studies are mixed in determining how well ARFID can be distinguished from other EDs (particularly AN), but converge in identifying several potential ARFID subclasses (i.e., sensory sensitivity, low appetite, feared eating-related consequences, and subclass representing a combination of these) with some overlapping features.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The existing ARFID empirical classification literature should guide future ARFID classification research priorities (e.g., incorporating mechanistic variables as classification indicators, incorporating longitudinal variables as classification validators) to inform differences between ARFID and other disorders and between ARFID presentations. Dimensional approaches to conceptualizing, studying, and modeling psychopathology (namely, the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology [HiTOP] and the Research Domain Criteria [RDoC]) may offer useful insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a relatively new formal diagnosis for which empirical classification research (defined here as studies using latent class/latent profile analysis-type methods) is still emerging. Such research focused on ARFID is an important gap to fill given questions about (1) the boundaries between ARFID and phenotypically similar presentations (e.g., eating disorders [EDs] such as anorexia nervosa [AN], and pediatric feeding disorder [PFD]), and (2) within-ARFID heterogeneity. These questions have practical implications, including diagnostic reliability and treatment selection.

Method: This forum synthesizes the limited empirical classification literature seeking to quantitatively distinguish ARFID from non-ARFID EDs or from PFD, and/or characterize within-ARFID heterogeneity.

Results: To our knowledge, only five studies in clinical samples have used empirical classification methods to delineate ARFID from non-ARFID EDs and/or characterize within-ARFID heterogeneity; no studies have used such methods to delineate ARFID from PFD. Existing studies are mixed in determining how well ARFID can be distinguished from other EDs (particularly AN), but converge in identifying several potential ARFID subclasses (i.e., sensory sensitivity, low appetite, feared eating-related consequences, and subclass representing a combination of these) with some overlapping features.

Discussion: The existing ARFID empirical classification literature should guide future ARFID classification research priorities (e.g., incorporating mechanistic variables as classification indicators, incorporating longitudinal variables as classification validators) to inform differences between ARFID and other disorders and between ARFID presentations. Dimensional approaches to conceptualizing, studying, and modeling psychopathology (namely, the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology [HiTOP] and the Research Domain Criteria [RDoC]) may offer useful insights.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回避/限制性食物摄入障碍分类的实证方法。
目的:回避/限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)是一种相对较新的正式诊断,经验分类研究(在这里定义为使用潜在类别/潜在剖面分析类型方法的研究)仍在兴起。此类针对ARFID的研究是填补以下问题的重要空白:(1)ARFID与表型相似表现(例如,神经性厌食症[an]和儿科喂养障碍[PFD]等饮食失调[EDs])之间的界限,以及(2)ARFID内部异质性。这些问题具有实际意义,包括诊断可靠性和治疗选择。方法:本论坛综合了有限的经验分类文献,旨在定量区分ARFID与非ARFID ed或PFD,和/或表征ARFID内部的异质性。结果:据我们所知,只有5项临床样本研究使用经验分类方法来区分ARFID和非ARFID ed和/或表征ARFID内的异质性;目前还没有研究使用这种方法来区分ARFID和PFD。现有的研究在确定ARFID与其他ed(特别是AN)的区分程度上是混杂的,但在确定几个潜在的ARFID子类(即感觉敏感,食欲不振,害怕进食相关后果,以及代表这些组合的子类)方面有一些重叠的特征。讨论:现有的ARFID经验分类文献应该指导未来ARFID分类研究的优先事项(例如,将机制变量作为分类指标,将纵向变量作为分类验证器),以告知ARFID与其他疾病之间以及ARFID表现之间的差异。对精神病理学进行概念化、研究和建模的维度方法(即,精神病理学层次分类法[HiTOP]和研究领域标准[RDoC])可能会提供有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
期刊最新文献
Program-Led and Focused Psychological Interventions. Using Artificial Intelligence to Advance Eating Disorder Research, Treatment and Practice. Validating Online Parent- and Self-Report Screening Methods for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder. Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) Symptoms in Adolescent Patients With Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction. Empirically Determining Binge/Purge Frequency Thresholds for Differentiating Anorexia Nervosa-Restricting Subtype vs. Binge-Purge Subtype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1