Intellectual property protection and firm risk: How service transition and knowledge intensity mitigate the loss of strategic resources

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115118
Kerry Hudson , Robert E. Morgan
{"title":"Intellectual property protection and firm risk: How service transition and knowledge intensity mitigate the loss of strategic resources","authors":"Kerry Hudson ,&nbsp;Robert E. Morgan","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The inherent rarity and inimitability of intellectual property (IP) has long been recognized as the foundation of its strategic value. These characteristics are compromised in markets with weak IP protection, where IP cannot be leveraged to create sustainable competitive advantage. This presents significant challenges for internationalization, and extant literature provides little guidance on how firms can mitigate this risk. From first principles of resource-based theory, we posit that service transition alleviates this loss of a strategic resource, representing a basis for reliable revenue generation that retains its rarity and inimitability across markets with varying levels of regulatory protection. Combining novel datasets on firms’ foreign market activity and countries’ IP rights, we find that IP risk increases the volatility of revenues and consequently firm idiosyncratic risk, but that this can be offset by (a) deriving a larger share of revenues from service-based business segments and (b) increasing the knowledge intensity of service offerings. Results from a 12-year panel of 2,716 firms across 223 industries offer new insights into how the regulatory environment can erode the strategic value of resources and practical recommendations to mitigate the detrimental effects on firm-specific risk and market performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 115118"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324006222","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inherent rarity and inimitability of intellectual property (IP) has long been recognized as the foundation of its strategic value. These characteristics are compromised in markets with weak IP protection, where IP cannot be leveraged to create sustainable competitive advantage. This presents significant challenges for internationalization, and extant literature provides little guidance on how firms can mitigate this risk. From first principles of resource-based theory, we posit that service transition alleviates this loss of a strategic resource, representing a basis for reliable revenue generation that retains its rarity and inimitability across markets with varying levels of regulatory protection. Combining novel datasets on firms’ foreign market activity and countries’ IP rights, we find that IP risk increases the volatility of revenues and consequently firm idiosyncratic risk, but that this can be offset by (a) deriving a larger share of revenues from service-based business segments and (b) increasing the knowledge intensity of service offerings. Results from a 12-year panel of 2,716 firms across 223 industries offer new insights into how the regulatory environment can erode the strategic value of resources and practical recommendations to mitigate the detrimental effects on firm-specific risk and market performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识产权保护与企业风险:服务转型与知识强度如何缓解战略资源损失
知识产权固有的稀有性和不可模仿性一直被认为是其战略价值的基础。这些特点在知识产权保护薄弱的市场中受到损害,在这些市场中,知识产权无法被用来创造可持续的竞争优势。这对国际化提出了重大挑战,现有文献对企业如何减轻这种风险提供了很少的指导。根据资源基础理论的第一原则,我们假设服务转换减轻了战略资源的损失,代表了在不同监管保护水平的市场中保持其稀有性和不可模仿性的可靠创收的基础。结合公司国外市场活动和国家知识产权的新数据集,我们发现知识产权风险增加了收入的波动性,从而增加了公司的特殊风险,但这可以通过(a)从基于服务的业务部门获得更大的收入份额和(b)增加服务产品的知识强度来抵消。对223个行业的2716家公司进行了为期12年的调查,结果为监管环境如何侵蚀资源的战略价值提供了新的见解,并为减轻对公司特定风险和市场表现的不利影响提供了实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
A new era of technology-infused retailing Industry 4.0 technologies and green creativity: Mediating roles of playful work design and leisure crafting A well-visualized effect: How nutritional content–equivalent labels influence healthfulness perceptions The impact of CEO contract duration on corporate misconduct Tracing the evolution of the marketing discipline through the lens of theory and Practice: A journal-centric view
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1