Effectiveness of Protection Motivation Theory on clinical factors, behavior change, and cardiovascular disease: An integrative review

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100267

Maryam Ghasemiardekani , Virginia Plummer , Louisa Lam , Biswajit Banik , Wendy Cross

{"title":"Effectiveness of Protection Motivation Theory on clinical factors, behavior change, and cardiovascular disease: An integrative review","authors":"Maryam Ghasemiardekani , Virginia Plummer , Louisa Lam , Biswajit Banik , Wendy Cross","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify and synthesize the primary evidence on the effectiveness of Protection Motivation Theory on and cardiovascular disease and diseases that are risk factors for cardiovascular disease.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>An integrative review was conducted using the Whittemore and Knafl method (2005).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven articles met the inclusion and quality assessment criteria. The integration of evidence was abundant in three themes 1) Physical activity 2) Weight and Body Mass Index, and 3) Food consumption and each theme having the same six sub-themes of self-efficacy, response-efficacy, response cost, severity, vulnerability and reward. No studies have addressed all clinical factors and behavioral changes associated with cardiovascular disease.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Due to the limited literature on the effectiveness of Protection Motivation Theory on behavioral changes in patients with cardiovascular diseases, generalizations and practice recommendations are limited. Further research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of this theory in patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100267"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To identify and synthesize the primary evidence on the effectiveness of Protection Motivation Theory on and cardiovascular disease and diseases that are risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Method

An integrative review was conducted using the Whittemore and Knafl method (2005).

Results

Eleven articles met the inclusion and quality assessment criteria. The integration of evidence was abundant in three themes 1) Physical activity 2) Weight and Body Mass Index, and 3) Food consumption and each theme having the same six sub-themes of self-efficacy, response-efficacy, response cost, severity, vulnerability and reward. No studies have addressed all clinical factors and behavioral changes associated with cardiovascular disease.

Conclusion

Due to the limited literature on the effectiveness of Protection Motivation Theory on behavioral changes in patients with cardiovascular diseases, generalizations and practice recommendations are limited. Further research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of this theory in patient outcomes.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

保护动机理论在临床因素、行为改变和心血管疾病中的有效性：一项综合综述

目的鉴别和综合保护动机理论对心血管疾病及心血管疾病危险因素有效性的初步证据。方法采用Whittemore和Knafl方法（2005）进行综合评价。结果6篇文章符合纳入标准和质量评价标准。三个主题(1)体力活动、2)体重和身体质量指数、3)食物消费证据整合丰富，每个主题都有相同的六个子主题：自我效能、反应效能、反应成本、严重性、脆弱性和奖励。没有研究涉及与心血管疾病相关的所有临床因素和行为改变。结论由于保护动机理论对心血管疾病患者行为改变有效性的文献有限，推广和实践建议有限。需要进一步的研究来评估这一理论在患者预后方面的有效性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊