A Standard Area Diagram Set to Estimate the Severity of Angular Leaf Spot in the Leaflets of Common Bean: Development and Validation

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES Journal of Phytopathology Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1111/jph.13442
Fernanda Dornelas Soares, Jonas Alberto Rios, Daniel Debona, Leandro Castro Silva, Fabrício Ávila Rodrigues
{"title":"A Standard Area Diagram Set to Estimate the Severity of Angular Leaf Spot in the Leaflets of Common Bean: Development and Validation","authors":"Fernanda Dornelas Soares,&nbsp;Jonas Alberto Rios,&nbsp;Daniel Debona,&nbsp;Leandro Castro Silva,&nbsp;Fabrício Ávila Rodrigues","doi":"10.1111/jph.13442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study aimed to develop and validate a standard area diagram set (SADs) to estimate the severity of angular leaf spot (ALS), caused by the fungus <i>Pseudocercospora griseola</i>, in the leaflets of common bean plants. For the elaboration of SADs, the minimum and maximum disease severity limits in the leaflets were considered, along with the intermediate levels following linear increments. The SADs had 10 levels of severity as follows: 0.5%, 2.2%, 4.5%, 9.6%, 20.1%, 30.8%, 41.2%, 52.1%, 67.4%, and 77.3%. The validation was performed by 20 raters, 10 inexperienced and 10 experienced in quantifying severities of foliar diseases. The severity estimates were obtained in 150 leaflets displaying different levels of severity without and using the proposed SADs. Accuracy, precision and reliability of the estimates were improved using SADs. The SADs obtained in the present study proved to be adequate to estimate the severity of ALS in the leaflets of common bean plants with the potential of use in any study in which it is crucial to quantify the severity of this foliar disease to discriminate treatments with precision and accuracy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phytopathology","volume":"172 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.13442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a standard area diagram set (SADs) to estimate the severity of angular leaf spot (ALS), caused by the fungus Pseudocercospora griseola, in the leaflets of common bean plants. For the elaboration of SADs, the minimum and maximum disease severity limits in the leaflets were considered, along with the intermediate levels following linear increments. The SADs had 10 levels of severity as follows: 0.5%, 2.2%, 4.5%, 9.6%, 20.1%, 30.8%, 41.2%, 52.1%, 67.4%, and 77.3%. The validation was performed by 20 raters, 10 inexperienced and 10 experienced in quantifying severities of foliar diseases. The severity estimates were obtained in 150 leaflets displaying different levels of severity without and using the proposed SADs. Accuracy, precision and reliability of the estimates were improved using SADs. The SADs obtained in the present study proved to be adequate to estimate the severity of ALS in the leaflets of common bean plants with the potential of use in any study in which it is crucial to quantify the severity of this foliar disease to discriminate treatments with precision and accuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用标准面积图估计豆小叶角斑严重程度:开发与验证
本研究旨在建立并验证一种标准面积图集(SADs),用于估计普通豆科植物小叶角斑病(ALS)的严重程度,该疾病是由灰树假cercospora griiseola真菌引起的。为了制定SADs,考虑了传单中疾病严重程度的最小和最大限度,以及线性增量后的中间水平。严重程度分为10个等级:0.5%、2.2%、4.5%、9.6%、20.1%、30.8%、41.2%、52.1%、67.4%、77.3%。验证由20名评分者进行,10名没有经验,10名在量化叶面疾病严重程度方面有经验。在没有和使用拟议的SADs的情况下,对150个显示不同严重程度的传单进行了严重程度估计。使用SADs提高了估计的准确性、精密度和可靠性。本研究中获得的SADs被证明足以估计普通豆类植物小叶ALS的严重程度,具有潜在的应用潜力,在任何研究中,量化这种叶面疾病的严重程度对于精确和准确地区分处理是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Phytopathology
Journal of Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Phytopathology publishes original and review articles on all scientific aspects of applied phytopathology in agricultural and horticultural crops. Preference is given to contributions improving our understanding of the biotic and abiotic determinants of plant diseases, including epidemics and damage potential, as a basis for innovative disease management, modelling and forecasting. This includes practical aspects and the development of methods for disease diagnosis as well as infection bioassays. Studies at the population, organism, physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic level are welcome. The journal scope comprises the pathology and epidemiology of plant diseases caused by microbial pathogens, viruses and nematodes. Accepted papers should advance our conceptual knowledge of plant diseases, rather than presenting descriptive or screening data unrelated to phytopathological mechanisms or functions. Results from unrepeated experimental conditions or data with no or inappropriate statistical processing will not be considered. Authors are encouraged to look at past issues to ensure adherence to the standards of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information First Record of Corynespora cassiicola Causing Leaf Spots on Casimiroa edulis (Rutaceae) in China Optimal Prediction and Prevention of Active Fruit Plant Disease Monitoring Using a Deep Learning Recommendation System for Smart Agriculture Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti Species Complex Causing Dry Rot in Capsicum frutescens Fruits in Brazil Isolation, Identification and Characterisation of Pseudomonas syringae pv. atrofaciens From Wheat Seed Lots in Yozgat Province, Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1