Community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals: a qualitative systematic review.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00221
Kieko Iida, Mina Ishimaru, Mayuko Tsujimura, Ayumi Wakasugi
{"title":"Community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Kieko Iida, Mina Ishimaru, Mayuko Tsujimura, Ayumi Wakasugi","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review was to examine community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The importance of health care professionals initiating advance care planning for patients has been reported; however, because of the shift from institutionalized to community care, community-dwelling older people have fewer opportunities to discuss these plans with health care professionals compared with older people living in other settings. The timely initiation of advance care planning and sustainable discussions among older people, their families, and community health care professionals is necessary and may improve palliative and end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies with participants aged 60 years and older who have experience with advance care planning and live in their own homes in the community were included. We considered qualitative studies and the qualitative component of mixed methods studies published between January 1999 and April 2023 in English or Japanese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), JSTOR, Scopus, Japan Medical Abstract Society, and CiNii were searched for published papers. Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global and MedNar were searched for unpublished papers and gray literature. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis were conducted by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI approach and JBI standardized tools. Findings were pooled using a meta-aggregation approach. The synthesized findings were graded using the ConQual approach for establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research syntheses and presented in a Summary of Findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in the review. Each study scored between 6 and 8 out of 10 on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. We extracted 28 findings and aggregated them into 7 categories, generating 3 synthesized findings: i) A trusting relationship with health care professionals is essential for older people's decision-making. Health care professionals' attitudes, knowledge, and skills play a role in this, influencing the perceived quality of care; ii) Shared decision-making and patient-centered communication are essential. Older people feel ambiguity toward end-of-life decision and advance care planning, and they want their wishes to be heard in any situation to maintain their autonomy and quality of life; iii) Older people need the appropriate forms and accessible and coordinated care to begin advance care planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Qualitative studies on community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals are scarce. The experiences have illustrated that trusting relationships influence people's perception of the quality of care they receive; there is uncertainty about their future; and they have varying feelings or attitudes toward their impending death, including denial and avoidance. This review highlights the need for appropriate forms, and accessible and coordinated care to begin advance care planning; thus, an approach that meets the individual's health and psychosocial status should be selected carefully. Further research is recommended to include older populations from broader geographical and cultural backgrounds, and to assess and evaluate the different advance care planning approaches and their implementation processes among groups of community-dwelling older people with different health and psychosocial statuses.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42020122803.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"69-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review was to examine community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals.

Introduction: The importance of health care professionals initiating advance care planning for patients has been reported; however, because of the shift from institutionalized to community care, community-dwelling older people have fewer opportunities to discuss these plans with health care professionals compared with older people living in other settings. The timely initiation of advance care planning and sustainable discussions among older people, their families, and community health care professionals is necessary and may improve palliative and end-of-life care.

Inclusion criteria: Studies with participants aged 60 years and older who have experience with advance care planning and live in their own homes in the community were included. We considered qualitative studies and the qualitative component of mixed methods studies published between January 1999 and April 2023 in English or Japanese.

Methods: MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), JSTOR, Scopus, Japan Medical Abstract Society, and CiNii were searched for published papers. Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global and MedNar were searched for unpublished papers and gray literature. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis were conducted by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI approach and JBI standardized tools. Findings were pooled using a meta-aggregation approach. The synthesized findings were graded using the ConQual approach for establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research syntheses and presented in a Summary of Findings.

Results: Five studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in the review. Each study scored between 6 and 8 out of 10 on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. We extracted 28 findings and aggregated them into 7 categories, generating 3 synthesized findings: i) A trusting relationship with health care professionals is essential for older people's decision-making. Health care professionals' attitudes, knowledge, and skills play a role in this, influencing the perceived quality of care; ii) Shared decision-making and patient-centered communication are essential. Older people feel ambiguity toward end-of-life decision and advance care planning, and they want their wishes to be heard in any situation to maintain their autonomy and quality of life; iii) Older people need the appropriate forms and accessible and coordinated care to begin advance care planning.

Conclusion: Qualitative studies on community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals are scarce. The experiences have illustrated that trusting relationships influence people's perception of the quality of care they receive; there is uncertainty about their future; and they have varying feelings or attitudes toward their impending death, including denial and avoidance. This review highlights the need for appropriate forms, and accessible and coordinated care to begin advance care planning; thus, an approach that meets the individual's health and psychosocial status should be selected carefully. Further research is recommended to include older populations from broader geographical and cultural backgrounds, and to assess and evaluate the different advance care planning approaches and their implementation processes among groups of community-dwelling older people with different health and psychosocial statuses.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020122803.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区居住老年人与卫生保健专业人员预先护理计划的经验:一项定性系统回顾。
目的:本综述的目的是研究社区居住的老年人与卫生保健专业人员进行预先护理计划的经验。导言:卫生保健专业人员为患者启动预先护理计划的重要性已被报道;然而,由于从机构护理转向社区护理,与生活在其他环境中的老年人相比,居住在社区的老年人与卫生保健专业人员讨论这些计划的机会较少。及时启动预先护理计划,并在老年人、他们的家庭和社区卫生保健专业人员之间进行可持续的讨论是必要的,这可能会改善姑息治疗和临终关怀。纳入标准:纳入年龄在60岁及以上、有预先护理计划经验且住在社区自己家中的研究对象。我们考虑了1999年1月至2023年4月间以英语或日语发表的定性研究和混合方法研究的定性成分。方法:检索MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO、JSTORE、Scopus、Japan Medical Abstract Society、CiNii等已发表论文,检索谷歌Scholar、ProQuest Dissertations和Theses Global、MedNar等未发表论文和灰色文献。研究选择、批判性评价、数据提取和数据合成由2名独立审稿人使用JBI方法和JBI标准化工具进行。研究结果采用meta-aggregation方法汇总。综合研究结果使用征服方法进行分级,以建立对定性研究综合结果的信心,并在研究结果摘要中提出。结果:2017年至2022年间发表的5项研究被纳入综述。在JBI定性研究的关键评估清单上,每个研究的总分在6到8分之间。我们提取了28项研究结果,并将其汇总为7类,得出了3项综合发现:1)与卫生专业人员的信任关系对老年人的决策至关重要。卫生专业人员的态度、知识和技能在这方面发挥作用,影响人们对护理质量的感知;共同决策和以患者为中心的沟通至关重要。老年人对临终决定和提前护理计划感到模棱两可,他们希望在任何情况下都能听到他们的愿望,以保持他们的自主权和生活质量;(三)老年人需要适当的形式和可获得和协调的护理,以便开始预先护理规划。结论:关于社区居住老年人与卫生保健专业人员进行预先护理计划的经验的定性研究很少。这些经验表明,信任关系影响人们对他们所接受的护理质量的看法;他们的未来充满不确定性;他们对即将到来的死亡有不同的感受或态度,包括否认和回避。该审查强调需要适当的形式,可获得和协调的护理,以开始预先护理规划;因此,应仔细选择符合个人健康和社会心理状况的方法。建议进行进一步的研究,以包括来自更广泛地理和文化背景的老年人,并评估和评价不同的预先护理规划方法及其在健康和社会心理状况不同的社区居住老年人群体中的执行过程。评审注册号:PROSPERO CRD42020122803。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
期刊最新文献
Textual evidence systematic reviews series paper 1: introduction to the revised JBI methodology and overview of recent changes. Long-term care insurance and implementation for older people in China: a systematic review of textual evidence protocol. Conducting Pairwise and Network Meta-analyses in Updated and Living Systematic Reviews: a Scoping Review Protocol. Effectiveness of Combined Physical and Psychological Interventions on Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Adult Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Systematic Review Protocol. Factors affecting decisions to use antibiotic-sparing treatment approaches in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1