Are females in classical hematology getting a fair share? Uncovering gender disparities in NIH R01 grants.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1430369
Sara Khan, Faraz Eshaghi, Mohammed Z Rehman, Serena Kotwal, Mariya Syed, Kainat Khan, Kapisthalam S Kumar
{"title":"Are females in classical hematology getting a fair share? Uncovering gender disparities in NIH R01 grants.","authors":"Sara Khan, Faraz Eshaghi, Mohammed Z Rehman, Serena Kotwal, Mariya Syed, Kainat Khan, Kapisthalam S Kumar","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1430369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gender Disparity remains a pressing issue in academic medicine, notably in classical hematology where females continue to be underrepresented by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for funded R01 grants. In this research, we analyzed ten years of NIH R01 grants funded in classical hematology, covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Of the 250,031 R01 grants funded during this period, females received only 32.9%. Further breakdown of the data by different NIH institutes highlights varying degrees of gender gaps, with specific institutes showing pronounced disparities. While some NIH Institutes have made progress in bridging the gap, others lag, indicating a need for a closer examination of institutional practices. We found that despite modest advancements, less than 50% of R01 grants were funded to females. These findings underscore persistent gender inequity and require concerted efforts to create a more inclusive atmosphere supportive of women's progress in academic medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"9 ","pages":"1430369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1430369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender Disparity remains a pressing issue in academic medicine, notably in classical hematology where females continue to be underrepresented by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for funded R01 grants. In this research, we analyzed ten years of NIH R01 grants funded in classical hematology, covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Of the 250,031 R01 grants funded during this period, females received only 32.9%. Further breakdown of the data by different NIH institutes highlights varying degrees of gender gaps, with specific institutes showing pronounced disparities. While some NIH Institutes have made progress in bridging the gap, others lag, indicating a need for a closer examination of institutional practices. We found that despite modest advancements, less than 50% of R01 grants were funded to females. These findings underscore persistent gender inequity and require concerted efforts to create a more inclusive atmosphere supportive of women's progress in academic medicine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性在传统血液学中得到公平的份额吗?揭露NIH R01拨款中的性别差异。
性别差异在学术医学中仍然是一个紧迫的问题,特别是在经典血液学中,女性在美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的R01拨款中仍然不足。在这项研究中,我们分析了NIH R01资助的经典血液学十年,涵盖2012年至2022年。在此期间资助的250,031笔R01赠款中,女性仅获得32.9%。对NIH不同研究所的数据进一步细分,突出了不同程度的性别差距,具体的研究所显示出明显的差异。虽然一些NIH研究所在弥合差距方面取得了进展,但其他研究所却落后了,这表明需要对机构实践进行更密切的检查。我们发现,尽管有适度的进步,但只有不到50%的R01资助给了女性。这些发现强调了持续存在的性别不平等,需要共同努力创造一个更包容的氛围,支持妇女在学术医学领域取得进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cognitive dissonance as a reason for low perceived HIV risk among Black women. Indigenous Maya-Mam leadership competencies: a grounded theory study. Scientific mapping of the nexus between entrepreneurial orientation and environmental sustainability: bibliometric analysis. Contesting crisis narratives amidst climatic breakdown: Climate change, mobility, and state-centric approaches to migration. From speech acts to communicative acts: social network debates about sexual consent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1