Performance of atraumatic restorative treatment in primary care: A study in the elderly with home-based dental care.

Luís Eduardo Genaro, Tânia Adas Saliba, Aylton Valsecki Júnior, Fernanda Lopez Rosell, Suzely Adas Saliba Moimaz
{"title":"Performance of atraumatic restorative treatment in primary care: A study in the elderly with home-based dental care.","authors":"Luís Eduardo Genaro, Tânia Adas Saliba, Aylton Valsecki Júnior, Fernanda Lopez Rosell, Suzely Adas Saliba Moimaz","doi":"10.1111/jphd.12652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in primary care among an elderly population in need of home-based dental care.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>It is an observational clinical study, more specifically a descriptive cohort study. The status of these restorations was evaluated1 year after placement. The analysis of ART's clinical performance was conducted through the direct clinical evaluation method, following criteria previously defined in earlier studies. Data were tabulated into sets of descriptive categories, allowing classification into a frequency distribution according to the evaluation score. Success and failure results underwent statistical evaluation using the chi-square test, with a significance level set at 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Elderly individuals (n = 35) participated in the study, where 103 restorations were performed in the home environment. The majority of participants were women (68.6%) with an average age of 72.3 years, and 54.3% faced difficulties in motor mobility. All received dental care exclusively at home, and 45.7% used dentures. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0156) between the percentage of failures and successful cases (73.8%) without the need for ART replacement. The majority of ART interventions were on occlusal surfaces (44.9%), showing the highest percentage of restorations in good condition (84.8%), followed by mesio-occlusal (81.3%), while disto-occlusal cavities exhibited the highest failure rate (38.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ART demonstrates satisfactory survival rates in elderly patients after 1 year. This restoration can be a viable alternative for the treatment of older adults, especially in situations that require domiciliary dental care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jphd.12652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the performance of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in primary care among an elderly population in need of home-based dental care.

Methodology: It is an observational clinical study, more specifically a descriptive cohort study. The status of these restorations was evaluated1 year after placement. The analysis of ART's clinical performance was conducted through the direct clinical evaluation method, following criteria previously defined in earlier studies. Data were tabulated into sets of descriptive categories, allowing classification into a frequency distribution according to the evaluation score. Success and failure results underwent statistical evaluation using the chi-square test, with a significance level set at 5%.

Results: Elderly individuals (n = 35) participated in the study, where 103 restorations were performed in the home environment. The majority of participants were women (68.6%) with an average age of 72.3 years, and 54.3% faced difficulties in motor mobility. All received dental care exclusively at home, and 45.7% used dentures. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0156) between the percentage of failures and successful cases (73.8%) without the need for ART replacement. The majority of ART interventions were on occlusal surfaces (44.9%), showing the highest percentage of restorations in good condition (84.8%), followed by mesio-occlusal (81.3%), while disto-occlusal cavities exhibited the highest failure rate (38.4%).

Conclusion: The ART demonstrates satisfactory survival rates in elderly patients after 1 year. This restoration can be a viable alternative for the treatment of older adults, especially in situations that require domiciliary dental care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非创伤性修复治疗在初级保健中的表现:一项老年人家庭牙科护理的研究。
目的:评价非创伤性修复治疗(ART)在老年人家庭牙科护理中的应用效果。方法:这是一项观察性临床研究,更具体地说,是一项描述性队列研究。在放置1年后评估这些修复体的状态。ART的临床表现分析采用直接临床评价方法,遵循早期研究中定义的标准。数据被制表成一组描述性的类别,允许根据评估分数分类成一个频率分布。成功和失败结果采用卡方检验进行统计评价,显著性水平设为5%。结果:老年人(n = 35)参与了这项研究,其中103例在家庭环境中进行了修复。大多数参与者是女性(68.6%),平均年龄为72.3岁,54.3%的人面临运动困难。所有患者均在家中接受牙科护理,45.7%的患者使用假牙。不需要ART替代的失败率与成功率(73.8%)有统计学差异(p = 0.0156)。ART干预主要集中在咬合面(44.9%),修复状态良好的比例最高(84.8%),其次是中牙合面(81.3%),而咬合面失败率最高(38.4%)。结论:老年患者接受ART治疗后1年生存率满意。这种修复可以是治疗老年人的一种可行的选择,特别是在需要居家牙科护理的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temporal trends in treatment delays for oral and oropharyngeal cancer in Brazil: An analysis of the national database. Dental Care Use Among Children and Adolescents in Medicaid: Associations With State-Level Medicaid Policy Factors and Provider Availability. Key factors associated with oral health services at Federally Qualified Health Centers. Antibiotic Prescription Trends in Dentistry: A Descriptive Study Using Japan's National Database. Who Could Be Targeted for Teledentistry in Japanese Clinics? A Questionnaire Survey of Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1